IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i3p73-d1615397.html

Expanding the Conceptualisations of Citizenship Norms—A Qualitative Study of Young Poles and Their Parents

Author

Listed:
  • Weronika Najda

    (The Gloucestershire Business School, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK)

  • Stuart Hanmer-Lloyd

    (The Gloucestershire Business School, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK)

Abstract

Research shows that the way people define a good citizen can influence their political participation. However, the well-known binary concept of ‘engaged’ and ‘duty-based’ citizenship, used in mass surveys, does not apply to the majority of studied populations; therefore, its usefulness can be disputed. Such social norms of citizenship can also change over time and this process can be profound in countries that undergo a political system change, like Poland in the 1980–90s. To gain insight into how Poles understand citizenship, and how the engaged/duty-based concept applies to them, we interviewed 32 Poles—young people and their parents. Our analysis shows that the standard conceptualisation would have not accounted for two key elements of our participants’ understanding of citizenship—a ‘character’ and a ‘patriotic’ component. This finding demonstrates the continuing impact of moral values and the salience of the national context. In particular, parents and inactive young people based their definitions on these two components. Active young people, on the other hand, chose all-encompassing citizenship norms, mixing engaged, duty-based, patriotic and character elements in their normative repertoire.

Suggested Citation

  • Weronika Najda & Stuart Hanmer-Lloyd, 2025. "Expanding the Conceptualisations of Citizenship Norms—A Qualitative Study of Young Poles and Their Parents," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1615397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/3/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/3/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry M. Bartels, 2016. "The New Gilded Age," Introductory Chapters, in: Unequal Democracy:The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, Princeton University Press.
    2. Larry M. Bartels, 2016. "Unequal Democracy:The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10831, December.
    3. Henry E. Brady & Kay Lehman Schlozman & Sidney Verba, 2015. "Political Mobility and Political Reproduction from Generation to Generation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 657(1), pages 149-173, January.
    4. Jennifer Oser, 2017. "Assessing How Participators Combine Acts in Their “Political Tool Kits”: A Person-Centered Measurement Approach for Analyzing Citizen Participation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 235-258, August.
    5. Catherine Bolzendahl & Hilde Coffé, 2013. "Are ‘Good’ Citizens ‘Good’ Participants? Testing Citizenship Norms and Political Participation across 25 Nations," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61, pages 63-83, April.
    6. Ellen Quintelier & Jan W. Deth, 2014. "Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Exploring Causality Using Panel Data," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 62, pages 153-171, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Komlos, John & Schubert, Hermann, 2019. "Les origines du triomphe de Donald Trump," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 26.
    2. Lambert, Thomas, 2024. "Displaced Worker Angst and Far Right Populism," MPRA Paper 120483, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Komlos John, 2019. "Reaganomics: A Watershed Moment on the Road to Trumpism," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Marcel Preuss & Germ'an Reyes & Jason Somerville & Joy Wu, 2025. "Are Elites Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking? Evidence from MBA Students," Papers 2503.15443, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    5. Evelyne Huber & Itay Machtei & John D. Stephens, 2023. "Testing Theories of Redistribution: Structure of Inequality, Electoral Institutions, and Partisan Politics," LIS Working papers 854, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    6. John Komlos, 2021. "Macroeconomic Inequality from Reagan to Trump. Market Power, Wage Repression, Asset Price Inflation, and Industrial Decline," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(318), pages 450-453, September.
    7. Haoyang Liu & W. Ben McCartney & Rodney Ramcharan & Calvin Zhang & Xiaohan Zhang, 2025. "Household Finance Shapes Political Participation: Evidence from Mortgage Refinancing," Working Papers 2517, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, revised 03 Mar 2026.
    8. Jennifer Wolak & David A. M. Peterson, 2020. "The Dynamic American Dream," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 968-981, October.
    9. Cohn, Alain & Jessen, Lasse J. & Klašnja, Marko & Smeets, Paul, 2023. "Wealthy Americans and redistribution: The role of fairness preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Xuanye Zeng & Zhuoying Fu & Xin Deng & Dingde Xu, 2021. "The Impact of Livelihood Risk on Farmers of Different Poverty Types: Based on the Study of Typical Areas in Sichuan Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Zamir Eyal, 2020. "Refounding Law and Economics: Behavioral Support for the Predictions of Standard Economic Analysis," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-35, July.
    12. Florian Scheuer & Joel Slemrod, 2021. "Taxing Our Wealth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 207-230, Winter.
    13. John Komlos, 2019. "Reaganomics: una línea divisoria," Tiempo y Economía, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, vol. 6(1), pages 47-76.
    14. Andrés César & Guillermo Falcone & Pablo Garriga, 2022. "Robots, Exports and Top Income Inequality: Evidence for the U.S," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0307, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    15. Florian Scheuer & Joel Slemrod, 2020. "Taxation and the Superrich," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 189-211, August.
    16. Maxim Senkov & Arseniy Samsonov, 2024. "Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters," Papers 2401.04273, arXiv.org.
    17. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman, 2025. "The Triad of Modern Democracies: Money, Identity, and Information in Shaping Power and Legitimacy," Papers 2505.09124, arXiv.org.
    18. Richard Clark & Sarah Kreps & Adi Rao, 2025. "The political economy of reshoring: Evidence from the semiconductor industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Manuel Hensmans, 2021. "Exploring the dark and bright sides of Internet democracy: Ethos-reversing and ethos-renewing digital transformation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/321232, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Matthias Fatke, 2018. "Inequality Perceptions, Preferences Conducive to Redistribution, and the Conditioning Role of Social Position," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1615397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.