IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i5p116-d1137808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similar or Different Training Cultures? German and Chinese Companies in Their Home and Host Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Pilz

    (Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)

  • Martina Fuchs

    (Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)

  • Junmin Li

    (Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)

  • Lena Finken

    (Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)

  • Johannes Westermeyer

    (Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

For internationally producing companies, training and recruiting skilled workers is particularly challenging. At various international locations, companies often encounter a “skills ecosystem” that differs to a greater or lesser extent from that of the home country. This article considers this problem and examines German companies in Germany and China and, conversely, Chinese companies in China and Germany. Specifically, it examines (1) how the training cultures of companies differ between the home country and abroad, (2) which influencing factors determine the training cultures realized in each case, and (3) what influence the respective nationally prevailing skills ecosystems specifically exert. The findings from these four perspectives document that German companies in Germany use the formal vocational training system of dual training, whereas German companies in China are strongly influenced by the local training culture of in-company learning. Moreover, Chinese companies in China also use this training, and only cooperate to a limited extent with the formal school-based vocational education and training system. These findings show that Chinese companies in Germany do not adopt the dual training system used in Germany. This article analyses these results and discusses the reasons behind them, drawing of a distinction between institutional logic and internal logic.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Pilz & Martina Fuchs & Junmin Li & Lena Finken & Johannes Westermeyer, 2023. "Similar or Different Training Cultures? German and Chinese Companies in Their Home and Host Countries," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:116-:d:1137808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/5/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/5/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heiner Depner & Harald Bathelt, 2005. "Exporting the German Model: The Establishment of a New Automobile Industry Cluster in Shanghai," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(1), pages 53-81, January.
    2. Pilz, Matthias, 2016. "Training patterns of German companies in India, China, Japan and the USA: What really works?," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 3(2), pages 66-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harald Bathelt & Sebastian Henn, 2014. "The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1403-1424, June.
    2. Xiaofei Chen & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao & Lili Ji & Shaoqi Pan, 2020. "Industrial Clusters as Drivers of Sustainable Regional Economic Development? An Analysis of an Automotive Cluster from the Perspective of Firms’ Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Yeung, Henry Wai-chung & Liu, Weidong & Dicken, Peter, 2006. "Transnational corporations and network effects of a local manufacturing cluster in mobile telecommunications equipment in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 520-540, March.
    4. Gericke, Erika Edith, 2017. "Why returning to VET? Results of a qualitative comparative study about English and German car mechatronics," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 4(3), pages 206-225.
    5. Jan van der Borg & Erwin van Tuijl, 2011. "Upgrading of Symbolic and Synthetic Knowledge Bases: Analysis of the Architecture, Engineering and Construction industry and the Automotive Industry in China," Working Papers 2011_25, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2017. "Nothing is in the Air," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 22-39, March.
    7. Martin Hess & Neil M Coe, 2006. "Making Connections: Global Production Networks, Standards, and Embeddedness in the Mobile-Telecommunications Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(7), pages 1205-1227, July.
    8. Zijun Luo & Yonghong Zhou, 2020. "Decomposing the effects of consumer boycotts: evidence from the anti-Japanese demonstration in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 2615-2634, June.
    9. Jun Lin & Steven Si, 2010. "Can guanxi be a problem? Contexts, ties, and some unfavorable consequences of social capital in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 561-581, September.
    10. Akçomak, Ibrahim Semih & Bürken, Serkan, 2019. "The middle-technology trap: The case of the automotive industry in Turkey," MERIT Working Papers 2019-006, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Markus Hassler, 2009. "Variations of Value Creation: Automobile Manufacturing in Thailand," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(9), pages 2232-2247, September.
    12. Philip Müller & Martin Franz, 2019. "Transnational labour migration and the offshoring of knowledge-intensive business services within global production networks: The case of a German automotive company in Turkey," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1350-1369, September.
    13. Yijia Chen & Robert Hassink, 2019. "Multi-scalar knowledge bases for new regional industrial path development: Toward a typology," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Zijun Luo & Yonghong Zhou, 2016. "Gainers and Losers of Political Instability: Evidence from the Anti-Japanese Demonstration in China," Working Papers 1608, Sam Houston State University, Department of Economics and International Business.
    15. Felix Haifeng Liao & Yehua H Dennis Wei, 2013. "Tncs' Technology Linkages with Domestic Firms: An Investigation of the Ict Industry in Suzhou, China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 460-474, June.
    16. Kibar, Samet, 2020. "Eine ökonomisch theoretische Analyse der Konzeption und Legitimation staatlicher Clusterförderung," Arbeitspapiere 191, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    17. Martin Hess & Henry Wai-Chung Yeung, 2006. "Whither Global Production Networks in Economic Geography? Past, Present, and Future," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(7), pages 1193-1204, July.
    18. Bathelt, Harald & Li, Pengfei, 2020. "Processes of building cross-border knowledge pipelines," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    19. Alfonso Redondo & Salvador Castillo & Luis Carro & Paulino Martín, 2021. "The Effects of European Recommendations on the Validation of Lifelong Learning: A Quality Assurance Model for VET in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Nam, Kyung-Min, 2015. "Compact organizational space and technological catch-up: Comparison of China's three leading automotive groups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 258-272.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:116-:d:1137808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.