IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i5p134-d922080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facing Conspiracies: Biden’s Counter-Speech to Trumpist Messages in the Framework of the 2020 US Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Concha Pérez-Curiel

    (Department of Journalism II, University of Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio, s/n. 41092 Seville, Spain)

  • Rubén Rivas-de-Roca

    (Department of Journalism II, University of Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio, s/n. 41092 Seville, Spain)

  • Ricardo Domínguez-García

    (Department of Journalism II, University of Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio, s/n. 41092 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

The climate of division and polarization in the US politics is increasing, going beyond the time in the office of a specific leader. Several political or technological challenges have ended up eroding this trust, making social cohesion difficult. In this context, this research examines the communication strategies of the elected president Biden after the 2020 elections, shedding light on how his legitimacy was built. All the messages that the Democrat published on his personal Twitter account (@JoeBiden) were collected, from the day after the presidential elections (4 November 2020) until his inauguration as president of the United States (20 January 2021). Using a content analysis method on issue/game frame and dissemination of the messages ( n = 379), and an analysis of the 100 first keywords, results showed a plan of the Democratic candidate to reinforce the role of public institutions but without interaction with the polarized electorate. In this sense, the strategies of the president-elect related to the promotion of political action, the call for unity, and the fight against the pandemic stood out. The frequent use of words with a positive attitude reveals how Biden avoided confrontation with Donald Trump.

Suggested Citation

  • Concha Pérez-Curiel & Rubén Rivas-de-Roca & Ricardo Domínguez-García, 2022. "Facing Conspiracies: Biden’s Counter-Speech to Trumpist Messages in the Framework of the 2020 US Elections," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:134-:d:922080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova & Lian Xue, 2019. "Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(5), pages 903-922, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ginzburg, Boris & Guerra, José-Alberto & Lekfuangfu, Warn N., 2023. "Critical Mass in Collective Action," MPRA Paper 117139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Concha Pérez-Curiel & Rubén Rivas-de-Roca & Mar García-Gordillo, 2021. "Impact of Trump’s Digital Rhetoric on the US Elections: A View from Worldwide Far-Right Populism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Sebastian J. Goerg & David Rand & Gari Walkowitz, 2020. "Framing effects in the prisoner’s dilemma but not in the dictator game," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Federica Alberti & Anna Cartwright & Edward Cartwright, 2021. "Predicting Efficiency in Threshold Public Good Games: A Learning Direction Theory Approach," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2021-01, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    5. Boris Ginzburg, 2023. "Slacktivism," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 35(2), pages 126-143, April.
    6. Funashima, Yoshito, 2022. "Efficiency and group size in the voluntary provision of public goods with threshold preference," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 237-251.
    7. Paul M. Gorny & Petra Nieken & Karoline Ströhlein, 2023. "He, She, They? The Impact of Gendered Language on Economic Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 10458, CESifo.
    8. Concha Pérez-Curiel & José Rúas-Araújo & Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, 2022. "When Politicians Meet Experts: Disinformation on Twitter About Covid-19 Vaccination," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 157-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:134-:d:922080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.