IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i6p110-d375797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unethical Managerial Behaviours and Abusive Use of Power in Downwards Vertical Workplace Bullying: A Phenomenological Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Medina

    (Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics (USBE), 901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Eduardo Lopez

    (Jack C. Massey College of Business, Belmont University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA)

  • Rolf Medina

    (Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics (USBE), 901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to introduce an ethical perspective of managerial behaviours to the study of vertical workplace bullying. A framework called the line of impunity was chosen that describes the missuses of power by certain ranks in organizations. Previous research on bullying addresses several perspectives such as the consequences of the bullying situation for the organization, the target and bystanders, the leadership style of the bully, the perceived structural support, and the manifestations of the abusive behaviours. However, to date, the ethical aspects have been poorly outlined. Applying the line of impunity brings light to several aspects of workplace bullying that are connected to an unethical use of power. This study is unusual because it is a phenomenological research based on two case studies that present the field experiences of two of the authors while working in different organizations, one in Sweden and the other in USA, during an extended period of time. The two main contributions of the study are the new concepts power methods and reinforcin g, which highlight the connection between abusive behaviour and the ethical aspects that are present in downwards vertical workplace bullying situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Medina & Eduardo Lopez & Rolf Medina, 2020. "The Unethical Managerial Behaviours and Abusive Use of Power in Downwards Vertical Workplace Bullying: A Phenomenological Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:110-:d:375797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/6/110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/6/110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chow, Chee W. & Harrison, Graeme L. & McKinnon, Jill L. & Wu, Anne, 2002. "The organizational culture of public accounting firms: evidence from Taiwanese local and US affiliated firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 347-360.
    2. Laura J. Noval & Günter K. Stahl, 2017. "Accounting for Proscriptive and Prescriptive Morality in the Workplace: The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Mood on Managerial Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 589-602, May.
    3. Jerome Popp, 2017. "Social Intelligence and the Explanation of Workplace Abuse," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvia Maja Melzer & Martin Diewald, 2020. "How Individual Involvement with Digitalized Work and Digitalization at the Workplace Level Impacts Supervisory and Coworker Bullying in German Workplaces," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Sim, 2010. "National culture effects on groups evaluating internal control," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(1), pages 53-78, February.
    2. Christoph Endenich & Michael Brandau & Andreas Hoffjan, 2011. "Two Decades of Research on Comparative Management Accounting – Achievements and Future Directions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(4), pages 365-382, December.
    3. Eddy Cardinaels & Huaxiang Yin, 2015. "Think Twice Before Going for Incentives: Social Norms and the Principal's Decision on Compensation Contracts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 985-1015, December.
    4. Byunghyun Lee & Changjae Lee & Ilyoung Choi & Jaekyeong Kim, 2022. "Analyzing Determinants of Job Satisfaction Based on Two-Factor Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Snellman, Kirsi & Fink, Matthias & Hakala, Henri & Bor, Sanne, 2023. "The creation of desirable futures: A call for supererogatory management to foster sustainability transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Kazeem O. Akinyele & Vicky Arnold & Steve G. Sutton, 2022. "Motivating unrewarded task performance: The dual effects of incentives and an organisational value statement in a discretionary task setting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2439-2466, June.
    7. Jixia Yang & Kuo Hui Frank Yu & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "Service employees’ concurrent adaptive and unethical behaviors in complex or non-routine tasks: The effects of customer control and self-monitoring personality," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 245-273, March.
    8. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    9. Nouri, Hossein & Parker, Robert J., 2013. "Career growth opportunities and employee turnover intentions in public accounting firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-148.
    10. Anh Dang & Trung Nguyen, 2021. "Valuation Effect of Emotionality in Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 47-67, September.
    11. Widad Atena Faragalla & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Liana Stanca & Delia Deliu, 2023. "Gender Discrimination Insights in Romanian Accounting Organisations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Peipei Pan & Chris Patel, 2018. "The Influence of Native Versus Foreign Language on Chinese Subjects’ Aggressive Financial Reporting Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 863-878, July.
    13. Billy Tat Wai Yu & Wai Ming To, 2021. "The Effects of Difficult Co-Workers on Employee Attitudinal Responses and Intention to Leave Among Chinese Working Adults," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    14. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Myeong-Gu Seo & Madhu Veeraraghavan, 2021. "Mood and Ethical Decision Making: Positive Affect and Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 189-208, June.
    15. Alice Garcia-Falières & Olivier Herrbach, 2015. "Organizational and Professional Identification in Audit Firms: An Affective Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 753-763, December.
    16. Parmod Chand & Michael White, 2006. "The Influence of Culture on Judgments of Accountants in Fiji," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(40), pages 82-88, November.
    17. Jeffrey R. Cohen & Derek W. Dalton & Lori L. Holder-Webb & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2020. "An Analysis of Glass Ceiling Perceptions in the Accounting Profession," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 17-38, June.
    18. Laura J. Noval & Morela Hernandez, 2019. "The Unwitting Accomplice: How Organizations Enable Motivated Reasoning and Self-Serving Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 699-713, July.
    19. Heidhues, Eva & Patel, Chris, 2011. "A critique of Gray's framework on accounting values using Germany as a case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 273-287.
    20. Changjae Lee & Byunghyun Lee & Ilyoung Choi & Jaekyeong Kim, 2023. "Exploring Determinants of Job Satisfaction: A Comparison Between Survey and Review Data," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:110-:d:375797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.