IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i6p320-d1417150.html

COVID-19 Pandemic, Economic Livelihoods, and the Division of Labor in Rural Communities of Delta and Edo States in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Francisca I. Omorodion

    (Department of Sociology & Criminology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada)

  • Andrew G. Onokerhoraye

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

  • Job I. Eronmhonsele

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

  • Osagie J. Aitokhuehi

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

  • Jones O. Abriku

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

  • Kuukua C. Hanson

    (Department of Sociology & Criminology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada)

  • Mercy O. Edejeghwro

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

  • Ernest O. Imongan

    (Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED), Benin City 300102, Nigeria)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic affected economic, social, health, and political aspects of most global, national, and local populations, including urban and rural communities. Government measures like lockdowns resulted in the closure of schools and businesses, while social distancing preventing group gatherings impacted public and private spaces. Based on key informants’ interviews with 36 participants drawn equally from three senatorial districts of Edo and Delta states of Nigeria, we analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the type of work men and women do and division of household activities, such as cooking, child, and family care. The findings show that traditional gender role ideology (GRI) defines and shapes rural men’s and women’s work, with women more engaged in farming, rearing livestock, and trading while men are engaged in farming, rearing livestock, and carrying out skilled jobs like carpentry, plumbing, and blacksmithing. The lockdown of schools and workplaces resulted in women disproportionately bearing the burden of cooking and caring for children, the elderly, and the sick. A few rural men shared childcare, while women spent more time on housework and childcare activities than in the pre-pandemic period when children were in school for 6–7 h daily. During the pandemic, rural men and women spent more time with the children, such that rural women stayed at home or took children to the farms and marketplaces where possible. Older siblings and the elderly also provided support for women. In conclusion, work and family activities during COVID were, to an extent, difficult to manage as parents had to cope with increasing food insecurity, economic and transportation costs, and social deprivation fostered by social norms, values, and practices that perpetuate gender inequality and marginalization of women.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisca I. Omorodion & Andrew G. Onokerhoraye & Job I. Eronmhonsele & Osagie J. Aitokhuehi & Jones O. Abriku & Kuukua C. Hanson & Mercy O. Edejeghwro & Ernest O. Imongan, 2024. "COVID-19 Pandemic, Economic Livelihoods, and the Division of Labor in Rural Communities of Delta and Edo States in Nigeria," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:320-:d:1417150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/6/320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/6/320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene van Staveren & Olasunbo Ode bode, 2007. "Gender Norms as Asymmetric Institutions: A Case Study of Yoruba Women in Nigeria," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 903-925, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu Juan & Li Yaokuang, 2020. "An Exploratory Cross-Country Analysis of Female Entrepreneurial Activity: The Roles of Gendered Institutions," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Qunyong Wang & Zhongwu Li & Xueliang Feng, 2019. "Does the Happiness of Contemporary Women in China Depend on Their Husbands’ Achievements?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 710-728, December.
    3. Mabsout, Ramzi & van Staveren, Irene, 2010. "Disentangling Bargaining Power from Individual and Household Level to Institutions: Evidence on Women's Position in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 783-796, May.
    4. Olumeh, Dennis Etemesi & Mithöfer, Dagmar, 2023. "Gender gaps in the collection and marketing of an underutilized plant species – Baobab in Malawi," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Twyman, Jennifer & Muriel, Juliana & Garcia, Maria Alejandra, 2015. "Identifying women farmers: Informal gender norms as institutional barriers to recognizing women’s contributions to agriculture," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 1(02).
    6. Diksha Arora & Codrina Rada, 2020. "Gender norms and intrahousehold allocation of labor in Mozambique: A CGE application to household and agricultural economics," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 259-272, March.
    7. Ghassan Dibeh & Ali Fakih & Walid Marrouch & Ghida Matar, 2021. "Who Cares About Environmental Quality in the MENA Region?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 603-629, September.
    8. Zicheng Wang & Yun Lou & Yi Zhou, 2020. "Bargaining Power or Specialization? Determinants of Household Decision Making in Chinese Rural Migrant Families," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    9. Desislava I. Yordanova, 2008. "Gender Effects on Performance in Bulgarian Private Enterprises," Working Papers 0806, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Oct 2008.
    10. Olurotimi O. Soneye, 2023. "Crop appropriation, labour supply, and demand for farm inputs: Evidence from Nigeria," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 995-1012, August.
    11. Zhongwu Li, 2023. "Does intrahousehold bargaining power enhance women's marital satisfaction? A perspective from two competing forces in China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 476-498, February.
    12. Karolina Goraus & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2013. "The Goodwill Effect? Female Access to the Labor Market Over Transition: A Multicountry Analysis," Working Papers 2013-19, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. Karimli, Leyla & Lecoutere, Els & Wells, Christine R. & Ismayilova, Leyla, 2021. "More assets, more decision-making power? Mediation model in a cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of the graduation program on women's empowerment in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Gottlieb, Jessica, 2016. "Why Might Information Exacerbate the Gender Gap in Civic Participation? Evidence from Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 95-110.
    15. Friedson-Ridenour, Sophia & Pierotti, Rachael S., 2019. "Competing priorities: Women’s microenterprises and household relationships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 53-62.
    16. Mara José Montenegro Guerra & Sandeep Mohapatra & Brent Swallow, 2019. "What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1225-1255, December.
    17. Irene van Staveren, 2013. "How gendered institutions constrain women’s empowerment," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 10, pages 150-166, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Desislava YORDANOVA & Tsvetan DAVIDKOV, 2009. "Similarities And Differences Between Female And Male Entrepreneurs In A Transition Context: Evidence From Bulgaria," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(4(10)_Win), pages 571-582.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:320-:d:1417150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.