IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i8p331-d873232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Agencies’ Readiness Evaluation towards Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Muh Kadarisman

    (Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Tangerang 15419, Indonesia)

  • Arie Wahyu Wijayanto

    (Department of Statistical Computing, Politeknik Statistika STIS, Jakarta 13330, Indonesia)

  • Anjar Dimara Sakti

    (Center for Sustainable Development Goals, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

The introduction of the Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 concepts has been undoubtedly challenging, and the readiness towards them could be fundamentally enhanced by strategic management and entrepreneurial governance. Bureaucracy in the majority of developing countries, including Indonesia, is an impediment due to the delays in bureaucratic reform and weak patterns of communication and coordination between their institutions. This study aims to analyze the readiness towards the era of Industry 4.0, and Society 5.0 in Indonesia from the perspectives of strategic management of the bureaucracy and entrepreneurial government. We undertake a case study on the organization of the Deputy for Human Resources of the Indonesian Ministry of Empowerment of the State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform and use a mixed method that simultaneously combines quantitative and qualitative methods. The resulted data from observations, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions were then analyzed using path analysis, descriptive methods, and qualitative approaches. Our results finding shows that there is a strategic value in data-based policies, and the ownership of data from various perspectives is strategically used as a direction for policymakers. One of the impacts of the Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 concepts is that the world has become increasingly connected. Hence, there are no boundaries between systems. Bureaucratic strategic management and entrepreneurial government have a significant effect on the readiness towards the Industry 4.0, and Society 5.0 concepts, in Indonesia, either partially or simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Muh Kadarisman & Arie Wahyu Wijayanto & Anjar Dimara Sakti, 2022. "Government Agencies’ Readiness Evaluation towards Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 in Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:331-:d:873232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Xu & Jeanne M. David & Suk Hi Kim, 2018. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 90-95, April.
    2. Matthew E. Gladden, 2019. "Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-39, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksy Kwilinski, 2024. "Understanding the nonlinear effect of digital technology development on CO2 reduction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5797-5811, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Gladden, 2019. "Understanding the cyber-physical-social-intentional Workforce 4.0," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 15-26.
    2. Zhu, Jun & Zhang, Jingting & Feng, Yiqing, 2022. "Hard budget constraints and artificial intelligence technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Galina Viktorovna Morozova & Irina Dmitrievna Porfireva, 2021. "Features of Information Coverage of Regional Environmental Policy on the Instance of the Republic of Tatarstan," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 210-218, April.
    4. Il'nur Ildusovich Farkhoutdinov & Aleksei Gennadevich Isavnin, 2021. "Restructuring Outsourcing: Classification and Methodical Approach to Evaluating Expediency and Economic Effect," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 274-283, April.
    5. Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Pooja J & LRK Krishnan, 2024. "AI Structuring Work Practices and Fuelling Employee Outcomes-Manufacturing Industry," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 2927-2938, July.
    7. Tamás Mizik & Judit Nagy & Endre Mihály Molnár & Zalán Márk Maró, 2025. "Challenges of employment in the agrifood sector of developing countries—a systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Mario Benassi & Elena Grinza & Francesco Rentocchini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Patenting in 4IR technologies and firm performance [Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 112-136.
    9. David Mhlanga, 2022. "Stakeholder Capitalism, the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), and Sustainable Development: Issues to Be Resolved," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. João C. Barbosa & Renato Gonçalves & Carlos M. Costa & Senentxu Lanceros-Mendez, 2021. "Recent Advances on Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-36, May.
    12. Jan Krzysztof Solarz & Krzysztof Waliszewski, 2022. "Pandemia COVID‑19 z perspektywy finansów – przenikanie się świata realnego i wirtualnego," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 213-234.
    13. Paolo Morganti & Rosa Carolina Valdes, 2023. "The Perils of Asymmetrical Technological Changes in a Knowledge Economy with Complete Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Lordan, Grace & Stringer, Eliza-Jane, 2022. "People versus machines: The impact of being in an automatable job on Australian worker’s mental health and life satisfaction," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    15. Huynh Thi Ngoc Hien & Nguyen Pham Gia Khanh, 2021. "Graduate employability in double challenge of post-covid labor market and digital transformation: The role of graduate’s capitals, 4.0 skills, attributes and perceived labor market," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(2), pages 85-107.
    16. Kinga Hat & Gernot Stoeglehner, 2020. "Spatial Dimension of the Employment Market Exposition to Digitalisation—The Case of Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, March.
    17. Katarzyna Szum & Joanicjusz Nazarko, 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Industry 4.0 Development Using an Extended SWOT Analysis: A Regional Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.
    19. Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rishi Pugazhendhi & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy & Vinoth Ramanathan & Senthilkumar Subramanian & Sachin Kumar & Kamalakannan Nandhagopal & , 2022. "Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    20. Afshan, Sahar & Ozturk, Ilhan & Yaqoob, Tanzeela, 2022. "Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 151-160.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:331-:d:873232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.