IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i7p134-d1698039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmasking Greenwashing in Finance: A PROMETHEE II-Based Evaluation of ESG Disclosure and Green Accounting Alignment

Author

Listed:
  • George Sklavos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Georgia Zournatzidou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51100 Grevena, Greece)

  • Konstantina Ragazou

    (Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Sariannidis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

This study examines the degree of alignment between the actual environmental performance and the ESG disclosures of 365 listed financial institutions in Europe for the fiscal year 2024. Although ESG reporting has become a standard practice in the financial sector, there are still concerns that the quality of the disclosure may not accurately reflect substantive environmental action, which increases the risk of greenwashing. This study addresses this issue by incorporating both ESG disclosure indicators and green accounting metrics into a multi-criteria decision-making framework. This framework is supported by entropy-based weighting to assure objectivity in criterion importance, as outlined in the PROMETHEE II method. The Greenwashing Risk Index (GWI) is a groundbreaking innovation that quantifies the discrepancy between an institution’s classification based on ESG transparency and its performance in green accounting indicators, including environmental penalties, provisions, and resource usage. The results indicate that there is a substantial degree of variation in the performance of ESGs among institutions, with a significant portion of them exhibiting high disclosure scores but insufficient environmental substance. These discrepancies indicate that reputational sustainability may not be operationally sustained. The results have significant implications for regulatory supervision, sustainable finance policy, and ESG rating methodologies. The framework that has been proposed provides a replicable, evidence-based tool for identifying institutions that are at risk of greenwashing and facilitates the implementation of more accountable ESG evaluation practices in the financial sector.

Suggested Citation

  • George Sklavos & Georgia Zournatzidou & Konstantina Ragazou & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2025. "Unmasking Greenwashing in Finance: A PROMETHEE II-Based Evaluation of ESG Disclosure and Green Accounting Alignment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:134-:d:1698039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/7/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/7/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:134-:d:1698039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.