IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i4p77-d1635296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Market Mean and Volatility Spillover Dynamics Between Cryptocurrencies and an Emerging Stock Market: Evidence from Thailand and Sectoral Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yanjia Zhang

    (Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Hua Mak Campus, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

  • Shih-tse Lo

    (Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Hua Mak Campus, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

  • Dhanoos Sutthiphisal

    (Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Hua Mak Campus, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

Abstract

The increasing interaction between the equity market and cryptocurrencies has raised concerns about volatility spillovers; however, empirical evidence about sectoral-specific spillover effects in emerging markets is scarce and hard to find. Existing research mainly concentrates on developed markets and aggregate equity indices, leaving a research gap in comprehending how sectoral indices variations impact market interactions in developing financial markets like Thailand. This article investigates the mean and volatility spillover effects between the Thai stock market and leading cryptocurrencies from April 2019 to April 2024. Applying bivariate VAR (1)-BEKK-GARCH (1,1) with an asymmetry model, this study examines the aggregate and sectoral-specific mean and volatility spillovers across major Thai stock market sectors. The findings reveal the significant mean spillover effect from cryptocurrencies to the Thai stock market with sectoral variation, while sectors such as industrials and financials exerted significant linkages, and the agricultural and food sector remains unaffected. Additionally, volatility spillovers were predominantly transmitted from the Thai equity market to cryptocurrency. Moreover, asymmetry effects were observed, with the asymmetry effects mainly transmitted from the Thai equity market to cryptocurrency. These findings provide critical insights for both individual and institutional investors on risk management and portfolio diversification while also helping policymakers with guidance on regulatory measures to mitigate systemic risks in emerging financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanjia Zhang & Shih-tse Lo & Dhanoos Sutthiphisal, 2025. "Inter-Market Mean and Volatility Spillover Dynamics Between Cryptocurrencies and an Emerging Stock Market: Evidence from Thailand and Sectoral Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:77-:d:1635296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Symitsi, Efthymia & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2018. "Return, volatility and shock spillovers of Bitcoin with energy and technology companies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 127-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Duan, Kun & Zhao, Yanqi & Urquhart, Andrew & Huang, Yingying, 2023. "Do clean and dirty cryptocurrencies connect with financial assets differently? The role of economic policy uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    3. Guo, Li & Sang, Bo & Tu, Jun & Wang, Yu, 2024. "Cross-cryptocurrency return predictability," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2021. "Stock market reactions to upside and downside volatility of Bitcoin: A quantile analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1602-1621, April.
    6. Ioannidis, Alexis & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J. & Li, Xin & Notton, Gilles & Stephanides, Phedeas, 2019. "The case for islands’ energy vulnerability: Electricity supply diversity in 44 global islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 440-452.
    7. Flori, Andrea, 2019. "News and subjective beliefs: A Bayesian approach to Bitcoin investments," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 336-356.
    8. Nikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2021. "A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-46, June.
    9. Koutmos, Dimitrios, 2018. "Liquidity uncertainty and Bitcoin’s market microstructure," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 97-101.
    10. Elgammal, Mohammed M. & Ahmed, Walid M.A. & Alshami, Abdullah, 2021. "Price and volatility spillovers between global equity, gold, and energy markets prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Rui Dias & Paulo Alexandre & Nuno Teixeira & Mariana Chambino, 2023. "Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Rui Dias & Mariana Chambino & Rosa Galvão & Paulo Alexandre & Mohammad Irfan, 2024. "Side Effects and Interactions: Exploring the Relationship between Dirty and Green Cryptocurrencies and Clean Energy Stock Indices," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 411-416, May.
    13. Kavya Clanganthuruthil Sajeev & Mohd Afjal, 2022. "Contagion effect of cryptocurrency on the securities market: a study of Bitcoin volatility using diagonal BEKK and DCC GARCH models," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Waqas Hanif & Hee-Un Ko & Linh Pham & Sang Hoon Kang, 2023. "Dynamic connectedness and network in the high moments of cryptocurrency, stock, and commodity markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-40, December.
    15. Feriel Gharbi, 2019. "Time-varying volatility spillovers among bitcoin and commodity currencies," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 1-2.
    16. Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. & Oliyide, Johnson A., 2021. "How COVID-19 drives connectedness among commodity and financial markets: Evidence from TVP-VAR and causality-in-quantiles techniques," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Helder Miguel Correia Virtuoso Sebastião & Paulo José Osório Rupino Da Cunha & Pedro Manuel Cortesão Godinho, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies and blockchain. Overview and future perspectives," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(3), pages 305-342.
    18. Li, Shi, 2022. "Spillovers between Bitcoin and Meme stocks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    19. Anwer, Zaheer & Farid, Saqib & Khan, Ashraf & Benlagha, Noureddine, 2023. "Cryptocurrencies versus environmentally sustainable assets: Does a perfect hedge exist?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 418-431.
    20. Singh, Amanjot, 2021. "Investigating the dynamic relationship between litigation funding, gold, bitcoin and the stock market: The case of Australia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 45-57.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:77-:d:1635296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.