IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i12p2153-d455549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations

Author

Listed:
  • Catalina Vich

    (Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Institute of Applied Computing and Community Code, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, E-07122 Illes Balears, Spain)

  • Rafel Prohens

    (Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Institute of Applied Computing and Community Code, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, E-07122 Illes Balears, Spain)

  • Antonio E. Teruel

    (Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Institute of Applied Computing and Community Code, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, E-07122 Illes Balears, Spain)

  • Antoni Guillamon

    (Department de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, E-08028 Catalunya, Spain)

Abstract

In the study of brain connectivity, an accessible and convenient way to unveil local functional structures is to infer the time trace of synaptic conductances received by a neuron by using exclusively information about its membrane potential (or voltage). Mathematically speaking, it constitutes a challenging inverse problem: it consists in inferring time-dependent parameters (synaptic conductances) departing from the solutions of a dynamical system that models the neuron’s membrane voltage. Several solutions have been proposed to perform these estimations when the neuron fluctuates mildly within the subthreshold regime, but very few methods exist for the spiking regime as large amplitude oscillations (revealing the activation of complex nonlinear dynamics) hinder the adaptability of subthreshold-based computational strategies (mostly linear). In a previous work, we presented a mathematical proof-of-concept that exploits the analytical knowledge of the period function of the model. Inspired by the relevance of the period function, in this paper we generalize it by providing a computational strategy that can potentially adapt to a variety of models as well as to experimental data. We base our proposal on the frequency versus synaptic conductance curve ( f − g s y n ), derived from an analytical study of a base model, to infer the actual synaptic conductance from the interspike intervals of the recorded voltage trace. Our results show that, when the conductances do not change abruptly on a time-scale smaller than the mean interspike interval, the time course of the synaptic conductances is well estimated. When no base model can be cast to the data, our strategy can be applied provided that a suitable f − g s y n table can be experimentally constructed. Altogether, this work opens new avenues to unveil local brain connectivity in spiking (nonlinear) regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2153-:d:455549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Wehr & Anthony M. Zador, 2003. "Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6965), pages 442-446, November.
    2. Lyle J. Borg-Graham & Cyril Monier & Yves Frégnac, 1998. "Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6683), pages 369-373, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. David Pérez-González & Olga Hernández & Ellen Covey & Manuel S Malmierca, 2012. "GABAA-Mediated Inhibition Modulates Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Manoj Kumar & Gregory Handy & Stylianos Kouvaros & Yanjun Zhao & Lovisa Ljungqvist Brinson & Eric Wei & Brandon Bizup & Brent Doiron & Thanos Tzounopoulos, 2023. "Cell-type-specific plasticity of inhibitory interneurons in the rehabilitation of auditory cortex after peripheral damage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Valentin Markounikau & Christian Igel & Amiram Grinvald & Dirk Jancke, 2010. "A Dynamic Neural Field Model of Mesoscopic Cortical Activity Captured with Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    8. Panagiotis Fotiadis & Matthew Cieslak & Xiaosong He & Lorenzo Caciagli & Mathieu Ouellet & Theodore D. Satterthwaite & Russell T. Shinohara & Dani S. Bassett, 2023. "Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Sean T Kelly & Jens Kremkow & Jianzhong Jin & Yushi Wang & Qi Wang & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B Stanley, 2014. "The Role of Thalamic Population Synchrony in the Emergence of Cortical Feature Selectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Katie H. Long & Justin D. Lieber & Sliman J. Bensmaia, 2022. "Texture is encoded in precise temporal spiking patterns in primate somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Daniel Bendor, 2015. "The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    13. James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Georgios Spyropoulos & Matteo Saponati & Jarrod Robert Dowdall & Marieke Louise Schölvinck & Conrado Arturo Bosman & Bruss Lima & Alina Peter & Irene Onorato & Johanna Klon-Lipok & Rasmus Roese & Serg, 2022. "Spontaneous variability in gamma dynamics described by a damped harmonic oscillator driven by noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2153-:d:455549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.