IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Bendor

Abstract

In auditory cortex, temporal information within a sound is represented by two complementary neural codes: a temporal representation based on stimulus-locked firing and a rate representation, where discharge rate co-varies with the timing between acoustic events but lacks a stimulus-synchronized response. Using a computational neuronal model, we find that stimulus-locked responses are generated when sound-evoked excitation is combined with strong, delayed inhibition. In contrast to this, a non-synchronized rate representation is generated when the net excitation evoked by the sound is weak, which occurs when excitation is coincident and balanced with inhibition. Using single-unit recordings from awake marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), we validate several model predictions, including differences in the temporal fidelity, discharge rates and temporal dynamics of stimulus-evoked responses between neurons with rate and temporal representations. Together these data suggest that feedforward inhibition provides a parsimonious explanation of the neural coding dichotomy observed in auditory cortex.Author Summary: How does our auditory system represent time within a sound? Previous work has demonstrated that both the firing rate of neurons (rate code) and the timing of their stimulus-evoked responses (temporal code) can be used by auditory cortical neurons to represent temporal information. We investigated the underlying mechanisms of these two neural representations using a computational model of a cortical neuron. We found that the timing and magnitude of inhibition determined whether neurons responded to an acoustic stimulus using a rate or temporal code. Our model predicts several differences in the response pattern of neurons using rate and temporal representations, which we next validated with electrophysiological data recorded from the auditory cortex of non-human primates. Together these data suggest that feedforward inhibition provides a parsimonious explanation of how rate and temporal representations are generated in auditory cortex.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Bendor, 2015. "The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004197
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004197
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004197&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaowei Chen & Ulrich Leischner & Nathalie L. Rochefort & Israel Nelken & Arthur Konnerth, 2011. "Functional mapping of single spines in cortical neurons in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 475(7357), pages 501-505, July.
    2. Daniel Bendor & Xiaoqin Wang, 2005. "The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7054), pages 1161-1165, August.
    3. Xiaoqin Wang & Thomas Lu & Ross K. Snider & Li Liang, 2005. "Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7040), pages 341-346, May.
    4. Michael Wehr & Anthony M. Zador, 2003. "Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6965), pages 442-446, November.
    5. Feng Zhang & Li-Ping Wang & Martin Brauner & Jana F. Liewald & Kenneth Kay & Natalie Watzke & Phillip G. Wood & Ernst Bamberg & Georg Nagel & Alexander Gottschalk & Karl Deisseroth, 2007. "Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7136), pages 633-639, April.
    6. Lanlan Ma & Xuhui Tai & Liye Su & Lijuan Shi & Enhua Wang & Ling Qin, 2013. "The Neuronal Responses to Repetitive Acoustic Pulses in Different Fields of the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002161 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Chenggang Chen & Sheng Xu & Yunyan Wang & Xiaoqin Wang, 2025. "Location-specific neural facilitation in marmoset auditory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Jianian Lin & Zongyue Cheng & Guang Yang & Meng Cui, 2022. "Optical gearbox enabled versatile multiscale high-throughput multiphoton functional imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. David Pérez-González & Olga Hernández & Ellen Covey & Manuel S Malmierca, 2012. "GABA A -Mediated Inhibition Modulates Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Wensheng Sun & Dennis L Barbour, 2017. "Rate, not selectivity, determines neuronal population coding accuracy in auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Lanlan Ma & Xuhui Tai & Liye Su & Lijuan Shi & Enhua Wang & Ling Qin, 2013. "The Neuronal Responses to Repetitive Acoustic Pulses in Different Fields of the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0067626 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Philip J Monahan & Kevin de Souza & William J Idsardi, 2008. "Neuromagnetic Evidence for Early Auditory Restoration of Fundamental Pitch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-6, August.
    13. Gwangsu Kim & Dong-Kyum Kim & Hawoong Jeong, 2024. "Spontaneous emergence of rudimentary music detectors in deep neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Dennis Vettkötter & Martin Schneider & Brady D. Goulden & Holger Dill & Jana Liewald & Sandra Zeiler & Julia Guldan & Yilmaz Arda Ateş & Shigeki Watanabe & Alexander Gottschalk, 2022. "Rapid and reversible optogenetic silencing of synaptic transmission by clustering of synaptic vesicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0019463 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Julie E Elie & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2019. "Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-43, September.
    17. Amelie C. F. Bergs & Jana F. Liewald & Silvia Rodriguez-Rozada & Qiang Liu & Christin Wirt & Artur Bessel & Nadja Zeitzschel & Hilal Durmaz & Adrianna Nozownik & Holger Dill & Maëlle Jospin & Johannes, 2023. "All-optical closed-loop voltage clamp for precise control of muscles and neurons in live animals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Panagiotis Fotiadis & Matthew Cieslak & Xiaosong He & Lorenzo Caciagli & Mathieu Ouellet & Theodore D. Satterthwaite & Russell T. Shinohara & Dani S. Bassett, 2023. "Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Sean T Kelly & Jens Kremkow & Jianzhong Jin & Yushi Wang & Qi Wang & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B Stanley, 2014. "The Role of Thalamic Population Synchrony in the Emergence of Cortical Feature Selectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Katie H. Long & Justin D. Lieber & Sliman J. Bensmaia, 2022. "Texture is encoded in precise temporal spiking patterns in primate somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    22. Roohollah Massoudi & Marc M Van Wanrooij & Huib Versnel & A John Van Opstal, 2015. "Spectrotemporal Response Properties of Core Auditory Cortex Neurons in Awake Monkey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    23. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003258 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. R Channing Moore & Tyler Lee & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2013. "Noise-invariant Neurons in the Avian Auditory Cortex: Hearing the Song in Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.