IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-33883-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Shen

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Xiaolong Jiang

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine
    Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital)

  • Federico Scala

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Jiakun Fu

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Paul Fahey

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Dmitry Kobak

    (University of Tübingen)

  • Zhenghuan Tan

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Na Zhou

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Jacob Reimer

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Fabian Sinz

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine
    University of Tübingen
    University of Tübingen)

  • Andreas S. Tolias

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine
    Rice University)

Abstract

Neocortical feedback is critical for attention, prediction, and learning. To mechanically understand its function requires deciphering its cell-type wiring. Recent studies revealed that feedback between primary motor to primary somatosensory areas in mice is disinhibitory, targeting vasoactive intestinal peptide-expressing interneurons, in addition to pyramidal cells. It is unknown whether this circuit motif represents a general cortico-cortical feedback organizing principle. Here we show that in contrast to this wiring rule, feedback between higher-order lateromedial visual area to primary visual cortex preferentially activates somatostatin-expressing interneurons. Functionally, both feedback circuits temporally sharpen feed-forward excitation eliciting a transient increase–followed by a prolonged decrease–in pyramidal cell activity under sustained feed-forward input. However, under feed-forward transient input, the primary motor to primary somatosensory cortex feedback facilitates bursting while lateromedial area to primary visual cortex feedback increases time precision. Our findings argue for multiple cortico-cortical feedback motifs implementing different dynamic non-linear operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-33883-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33883-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33883-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-33883-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosiljka Tasic & Zizhen Yao & Lucas T. Graybuck & Kimberly A. Smith & Thuc Nghi Nguyen & Darren Bertagnolli & Jeff Goldy & Emma Garren & Michael N. Economo & Sarada Viswanathan & Osnat Penn & Trygve B, 2018. "Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 563(7729), pages 72-78, November.
    2. Michael Wehr & Anthony M. Zador, 2003. "Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6965), pages 442-446, November.
    3. Matthew E. Larkum & J. Julius Zhu & Bert Sakmann, 1999. "A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6725), pages 338-341, March.
    4. Ning-long Xu & Mark T. Harnett & Stephen R. Williams & Daniel Huber & Daniel H. O’Connor & Karel Svoboda & Jeffrey C. Magee, 2012. "Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task," Nature, Nature, vol. 492(7428), pages 247-251, December.
    5. Lauri Nurminen & Sam Merlin & Maryam Bijanzadeh & Frederick Federer & Alessandra Angelucci, 2018. "Top-down feedback controls spatial summation and response amplitude in primate visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Hillel Adesnik & William Bruns & Hiroki Taniguchi & Z. Josh Huang & Massimo Scanziani, 2012. "A neural circuit for spatial summation in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 490(7419), pages 226-231, October.
    7. Leopoldo Petreanu & Tianyi Mao & Scott M. Sternson & Karel Svoboda, 2009. "The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7233), pages 1142-1145, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanjie Wang & Zhaonan Chen & Guofen Ma & Lizhao Wang & Yanmei Liu & Meiling Qin & Xiang Fei & Yifan Wu & Min Xu & Siyu Zhang, 2023. "A frontal transcallosal inhibition loop mediates interhemispheric balance in visuospatial processing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Giuseppe Chindemi & Marwan Abdellah & Oren Amsalem & Ruth Benavides-Piccione & Vincent Delattre & Michael Doron & András Ecker & Aurélien T. Jaquier & James King & Pramod Kumbhar & Caitlin Monney & Ro, 2022. "A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Manoj Kumar & Gregory Handy & Stylianos Kouvaros & Yanjun Zhao & Lovisa Ljungqvist Brinson & Eric Wei & Brandon Bizup & Brent Doiron & Thanos Tzounopoulos, 2023. "Cell-type-specific plasticity of inhibitory interneurons in the rehabilitation of auditory cortex after peripheral damage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Xinrui Zhou & Wan Yi Seow & Norbert Ha & Teh How Cheng & Lingfan Jiang & Jeeranan Boonruangkan & Jolene Jie Lin Goh & Shyam Prabhakar & Nigel Chou & Kok Hao Chen, 2024. "Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics using FISHnCHIPs of multiple co-expressed genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Hironobu Osaki & Moeko Kanaya & Yoshifumi Ueta & Mariko Miyata, 2022. "Distinct nociception processing in the dysgranular and barrel regions of the mouse somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Jan C. Frankowski & Alexa Tierno & Shreya Pavani & Quincy Cao & David C. Lyon & Robert F. Hunt, 2022. "Brain-wide reconstruction of inhibitory circuits after traumatic brain injury," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Jonathan P. Ling & Alexei M. Bygrave & Clayton P. Santiago & Rogger P. Carmen-Orozco & Vickie T. Trinh & Minzhong Yu & Yini Li & Ying Liu & Kyra D. Bowden & Leighton H. Duncan & Jeong Han & Kamil Tane, 2022. "Cell-specific regulation of gene expression using splicing-dependent frameshifting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Zhaoran Zhang & Edward Zagha, 2023. "Motor cortex gates distractor stimulus encoding in sensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. David Pérez-González & Olga Hernández & Ellen Covey & Manuel S Malmierca, 2012. "GABAA-Mediated Inhibition Modulates Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Thomas Miconi & Rufin VanRullen, 2016. "A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Dehua Peng & Zhipeng Gui & Dehe Wang & Yuncheng Ma & Zichen Huang & Yu Zhou & Huayi Wu, 2022. "Clustering by measuring local direction centrality for data with heterogeneous density and weak connectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Arjun A. Bhaskaran & Théo Gauvrit & Yukti Vyas & Guillaume Bony & Melanie Ginger & Andreas Frick, 2023. "Endogenous noise of neocortical neurons correlates with atypical sensory response variability in the Fmr1−/y mouse model of autism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Christopher Ebsch & Robert Rosenbaum, 2018. "Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Nelson Johansen & Hongru Hu & Gerald Quon, 2023. "Projecting RNA measurements onto single cell atlases to extract cell type-specific expression profiles using scProjection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Koun Onodera & Hiroyuki K. Kato, 2022. "Translaminar recurrence from layer 5 suppresses superficial cortical layers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. April R. Kriebel & Joshua D. Welch, 2022. "UINMF performs mosaic integration of single-cell multi-omic datasets using nonnegative matrix factorization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Luis Flores Horgue & Alexis Assens & Leon Fodoulian & Leonardo Marconi & Joël Tuberosa & Alexander Haider & Madlaina Boillat & Alan Carleton & Ivan Rodriguez, 2022. "Transcriptional adaptation of olfactory sensory neurons to GPCR identity and activity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-33883-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.