IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs

Author

Listed:
  • James M McFarland
  • Yuwei Cui
  • Daniel A Butts

Abstract

The computation represented by a sensory neuron's response to stimuli is constructed from an array of physiological processes both belonging to that neuron and inherited from its inputs. Although many of these physiological processes are known to be nonlinear, linear approximations are commonly used to describe the stimulus selectivity of sensory neurons (i.e., linear receptive fields). Here we present an approach for modeling sensory processing, termed the Nonlinear Input Model (NIM), which is based on the hypothesis that the dominant nonlinearities imposed by physiological mechanisms arise from rectification of a neuron's inputs. Incorporating such ‘upstream nonlinearities’ within the standard linear-nonlinear (LN) cascade modeling structure implicitly allows for the identification of multiple stimulus features driving a neuron's response, which become directly interpretable as either excitatory or inhibitory. Because its form is analogous to an integrate-and-fire neuron receiving excitatory and inhibitory inputs, model fitting can be guided by prior knowledge about the inputs to a given neuron, and elements of the resulting model can often result in specific physiological predictions. Furthermore, by providing an explicit probabilistic model with a relatively simple nonlinear structure, its parameters can be efficiently optimized and appropriately regularized. Parameter estimation is robust and efficient even with large numbers of model components and in the context of high-dimensional stimuli with complex statistical structure (e.g. natural stimuli). We describe detailed methods for estimating the model parameters, and illustrate the advantages of the NIM using a range of example sensory neurons in the visual and auditory systems. We thus present a modeling framework that can capture a broad range of nonlinear response functions while providing physiologically interpretable descriptions of neural computation.Author Summary: Sensory neurons are capable of representing a wide array of computations on sensory stimuli. Such complex computations are thought to arise in large part from the accumulation of relatively simple nonlinear operations across the sensory processing hierarchies. However, models of sensory processing typically rely on mathematical approximations of the overall relationship between stimulus and response, such as linear or quadratic expansions, which can overlook critical elements of sensory computation and miss opportunities to reveal how the underlying inputs contribute to a neuron's response. Here we present a physiologically inspired nonlinear modeling framework, the ‘Nonlinear Input Model’ (NIM), which instead assumes that neuronal computation can be approximated as a sum of excitatory and suppressive ‘neuronal inputs’. We show that this structure is successful at explaining neuronal responses in a variety of sensory areas. Furthermore, model fitting can be guided by prior knowledge about the inputs to a given neuron, and its results can often suggest specific physiological predictions. We illustrate the advantages of the proposed model and demonstrate specific parameter estimation procedures using a range of example sensory neurons in both the visual and auditory systems.

Suggested Citation

  • James M McFarland & Yuwei Cui & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Inferring Nonlinear Neuronal Computation Based on Physiologically Plausible Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003143
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003143&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anja L. Dorrn & Kexin Yuan & Alison J. Barker & Christoph E. Schreiner & Robert C. Froemke, 2010. "Developmental sensory experience balances cortical excitation and inhibition," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7300), pages 932-936, June.
    2. Nicholas A Lesica & Chong Weng & Jianzhong Jin & Chun-I Yeh & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B Stanley, 2006. "Dynamic Encoding of Natural Luminance Sequences by LGN Bursts," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-1, June.
    3. Michael Wehr & Anthony M. Zador, 2003. "Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6965), pages 442-446, November.
    4. Timm Lochmann & Timothy J Blanche & Daniel A Butts, 2013. "Construction of Direction Selectivity through Local Energy Computations in Primary Visual Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Yujiao J. Sun & Guangying K. Wu & Bao-hua Liu & Pingyang Li & Mu Zhou & Zhongju Xiao & Huizhong W. Tao & Li I. Zhang, 2010. "Fine-tuning of pre-balanced excitation and inhibition during auditory cortical development," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7300), pages 927-931, June.
    6. Jeffrey D Fitzgerald & Ryan J Rowekamp & Lawrence C Sincich & Tatyana O Sharpee, 2011. "Second Order Dimensionality Reduction Using Minimum and Maximum Mutual Information Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    7. Donald R Cantrell & Jianhua Cang & John B Troy & Xiaorong Liu, 2010. "Non-Centered Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Neurotrophin-3 as a Developmental Regulator of Receptive Field Properties of ON-OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Daniel A. Butts & Chong Weng & Jianzhong Jin & Chun-I Yeh & Nicholas A. Lesica & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B. Stanley, 2007. "Temporal precision in the neural code and the timescales of natural vision," Nature, Nature, vol. 449(7158), pages 92-95, September.
    9. Ana Calabrese & Joseph W Schumacher & David M Schneider & Liam Paninski & Sarah M N Woolley, 2011. "A Generalized Linear Model for Estimating Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields from Responses to Natural Sounds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Mijung Park & Jonathan W Pillow, 2011. "Receptive Field Inference with Localized Priors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziniu Wu & Harold Rockwell & Yimeng Zhang & Shiming Tang & Tai Sing Lee, 2021. "Complexity and diversity in sparse code priors improve receptive field characterization of Macaque V1 neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Max F Burg & Santiago A Cadena & George H Denfield & Edgar Y Walker & Andreas S Tolias & Matthias Bethge & Alexander S Ecker, 2021. "Learning divisive normalization in primary visual cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Niru Maheswaranathan & David B Kastner & Stephen A Baccus & Surya Ganguli, 2018. "Inferring hidden structure in multilayered neural circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    4. repec:plo:pcbi00:1004927 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Johannes Burge & Priyank Jaini, 2017. "Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, February.
    7. Lucas Theis & Andrè Maia Chagas & Daniel Arnstein & Cornelius Schwarz & Matthias Bethge, 2013. "Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    8. Ross S Williamson & Maneesh Sahani & Jonathan W Pillow, 2015. "The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Jian K Liu & Tim Gollisch, 2015. "Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    10. Maxim Volgushev & Vladimir Ilin & Ian H Stevenson, 2015. "Identifying and Tracking Simulated Synaptic Inputs from Neuronal Firing: Insights from In Vitro Experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.
    11. Julian Rossbroich & Daniel Trotter & John Beninger & Katalin Tóth & Richard Naud, 2021. "Linear-nonlinear cascades capture synaptic dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian K Liu & Tim Gollisch, 2015. "Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002161 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Omer Mano & Damon A Clark, 2017. "Graphics Processing Unit-Accelerated Code for Computing Second-Order Wiener Kernels and Spike-Triggered Covariance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Ivar L Thorson & Jean Liénard & Stephen V David, 2015. "The Essential Complexity of Auditory Receptive Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, December.
    5. Sean T Kelly & Jens Kremkow & Jianzhong Jin & Yushi Wang & Qi Wang & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B Stanley, 2014. "The Role of Thalamic Population Synchrony in the Emergence of Cortical Feature Selectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Ross S Williamson & Maneesh Sahani & Jonathan W Pillow, 2015. "The Equivalence of Information-Theoretic and Likelihood-Based Methods for Neural Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Ashlan P. Reid & Demetrios Neophytou & Robert Levy & Cody Pham & Hysell V. Oviedo, 2025. "Asynchronous development of the mouse auditory cortex is driven by hemispheric identity and sex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Irina Pochinok & Tristan M. Stöber & Jochen Triesch & Mattia Chini & Ileana L. Hanganu-Opatz, 2024. "A developmental increase of inhibition promotes the emergence of hippocampal ripples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. David Pérez-González & Olga Hernández & Ellen Covey & Manuel S Malmierca, 2012. "GABA A -Mediated Inhibition Modulates Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Bryce Allen Bagley & Blake Bordelon & Benjamin Moseley & Ralf Wessel, 2020. "Pre-Synaptic Pool Modification (PSPM): A supervised learning procedure for recurrent spiking neural networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Lucas Theis & Andrè Maia Chagas & Daniel Arnstein & Cornelius Schwarz & Matthias Bethge, 2013. "Beyond GLMs: A Generative Mixture Modeling Approach to Neural System Identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0019463 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zane N Aldworth & Alexander G Dimitrov & Graham I Cummins & Tomáš Gedeon & John P Miller, 2011. "Temporal Encoding in a Nervous System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Panagiotis Fotiadis & Matthew Cieslak & Xiaosong He & Lorenzo Caciagli & Mathieu Ouellet & Theodore D. Satterthwaite & Russell T. Shinohara & Dani S. Bassett, 2023. "Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Ovidiu F Jurjuţ & Danko Nikolić & Wolf Singer & Shan Yu & Martha N Havenith & Raul C Mureşan, 2011. "Timescales of Multineuronal Activity Patterns Reflect Temporal Structure of Visual Stimuli," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Katie H. Long & Justin D. Lieber & Sliman J. Bensmaia, 2022. "Texture is encoded in precise temporal spiking patterns in primate somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Eva R M Joosten & Shihab A Shamma & Christian Lorenzi & Peter Neri, 2016. "Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    21. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003258 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Cheng Ly & Brent Doiron, 2009. "Divisive Gain Modulation with Dynamic Stimuli in Integrate-and-Fire Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, April.
    23. Jingwei Sun & Jian Li & Hang Zhang, 2019. "Human representation of multimodal distributions as clusters of samples," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-29, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.