IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i7p593-d244832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfying Bank Capital Requirements: A Robustness Approach in a Modified Roy Safety-First Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ebenezer Fiifi Emire Atta Mills

    (Department of Finance, School of Economics & Management, Jiangxi University of Science & Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Ganzhou Academy of Financial Research (GAFR), Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Bo Yu

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Kailin Zeng

    (Department of Finance, School of Economics & Management, Jiangxi University of Science & Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Ganzhou Academy of Financial Research (GAFR), Ganzhou 341000, China)

Abstract

This study considers an asset-liability optimization model based on constraint robustness with the chance constraint of capital to risk assets ratio in a safety-first framework under the condition that only moment information is known. This paper aims to extend the proposed single-objective capital to risk assets ratio chance constrained optimization model in the literature by considering the multi-objective constraint robustness approach in a modified safety-first framework. To solve the optimization model, we develop a deterministic convex counterpart of the capital to risk assets ratio robust probability constraint. In a consolidated risk measure of variance and safety-first framework, the proposed distributionally-robust capital to risk asset ratio chance-constrained optimization model guarantees banks will meet the capital requirements of Basel III with a likelihood of 95% irrespective of changes in the future market value of assets. Even under the worst-case scenario, i.e., when loans default, our proposed capital to risk asset ratio chance-constrained optimization model meets the minimum total requirements of Basel III. The practical implications of the findings of this study are that the model, when applied, will provide safety against extreme losses while maximizing returns and minimizing risk, which is prudent in this post-financial crisis regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebenezer Fiifi Emire Atta Mills & Bo Yu & Kailin Zeng, 2019. "Satisfying Bank Capital Requirements: A Robustness Approach in a Modified Roy Safety-First Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:7:p:593-:d:244832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/7/593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/7/593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parreño-Torres, Consuelo & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon & Ruiz, Rubén, 2019. "Integer programming models for the pre-marshalling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 142-154.
    2. Acharya, Viral V. & Bharath, Sreedhar T. & Srinivasan, Anand, 2007. "Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 787-821, September.
    3. G. C. Calafiore & L. El Ghaoui, 2006. "On Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Linear Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Khieu, Hinh D. & Mullineaux, Donald J. & Yi, Ha-Chin, 2012. "The determinants of bank loan recovery rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 923-933.
    5. Lotfi, Somayyeh & Zenios, Stavros A., 2018. "Robust VaR and CVaR optimization under joint ambiguity in distributions, means, and covariances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 556-576.
    6. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    7. B. K. Pagnoncelli & S. Ahmed & A. Shapiro, 2009. "Sample Average Approximation Method for Chance Constrained Programming: Theory and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 399-416, August.
    8. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization and Its Tractable Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 902-917, August.
    9. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Wang & Huafei Sun & Simone Fiori, 2019. "Empirical Means on Pseudo-Orthogonal Groups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Pejman Peykani & Mostafa Sargolzaei & Mohammad Hashem Botshekan & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Amir Takaloo, 2023. "Optimization of Asset and Liability Management of Banks with Minimum Possible Changes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    2. Postek, Krzysztof & Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, Dick & Melenberg, Bertrand, 2015. "Exact Robust Counterparts of Ambiguous Stochastic Constraints Under Mean and Dispersion Information," Other publications TiSEM d718e419-a375-4707-b206-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Yue Zhao & Zhi Chen & Zhenzhen Zhang, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained p -Hub Center Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1361-1382, November.
    4. Zhao, Shuaidong & Zhang, Kuilin, 2020. "A distributionally robust stochastic optimization-based model predictive control with distributionally robust chance constraints for cooperative adaptive cruise control under uncertain traffic conditi," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 144-178.
    5. Shen Peng & Jie Jiang, 2021. "Stochastic mathematical programs with probabilistic complementarity constraints: SAA and distributionally robust approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 153-184, September.
    6. Postek, Krzysztof & Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, Dick & Melenberg, Bertrand, 2015. "Exact Robust Counterparts of Ambiguous Stochastic Constraints Under Mean and Dispersion Information," Discussion Paper 2015-030, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    8. Viet Anh Nguyen & Daniel Kuhn & Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani, 2018. "Distributionally Robust Inverse Covariance Estimation: The Wasserstein Shrinkage Estimator," Papers 1805.07194, arXiv.org.
    9. Longsheng Sun & Mark H. Karwan & Changhyun Kwon, 2018. "Generalized Bounded Rationality and Robust Multicommodity Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 42-57, 1-2.
    10. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.
    11. Steffen Rebennack, 2022. "Data-driven stochastic optimization for distributional ambiguity with integrated confidence region," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 255-293, October.
    12. Yang, Yongjian & Yin, Yunqiang & Wang, Dujuan & Ignatius, Joshua & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dhamotharan, Lalitha, 2023. "Distributionally robust multi-period location-allocation with multiple resources and capacity levels in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1042-1062.
    13. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    14. Liu, Haiyan & Mao, Tiantian, 2022. "Distributionally robust reinsurance with Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 393-417.
    15. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    16. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2019. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for surgery block allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 740-753.
    17. Arthur Flajolet & Sébastien Blandin & Patrick Jaillet, 2018. "Robust Adaptive Routing Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 210-229, January.
    18. Huyên Pham & Xiaoli Wei & Chao Zhou, 2022. "Portfolio diversification and model uncertainty: A robust dynamic mean‐variance approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 349-404, January.
    19. Lu, Mengshi & Nakao, Hideaki & Shen, Siqian & Zhao, Lin, 2021. "Non-profit resource allocation and service scheduling with cross-subsidization and uncertain resource consumptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Mohseni, Shayan & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2023. "Energy trading and scheduling in networked microgrids using fuzzy bargaining game theory and distributionally robust optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:7:p:593-:d:244832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.