IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i6p981-d1613984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Maintenance Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence Digital Twin Technologies, and Internet of Robotic Things in Big Data-Driven Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Nagy

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Marcel Figura

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Katarina Valaskova

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • George Lăzăroiu

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
    Intelligent Communication and Computing Laboratory, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
    The Creative Computing Research Centre, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK
    Department of Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, 030045 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In Industry 4.0, predictive maintenance (PdM) is key to optimising production processes. While its popularity among companies grows, most studies highlight theoretical benefits, with few providing empirical evidence on its economic impact. This study aims to fill this gap by quantifying the economic performance of manufacturing companies in the Visegrad Group countries through PdM algorithms. The purpose of our research is to assess whether these companies generate higher operational profits and lower sales costs. Using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, the Hodges–Lehmann median difference estimate, and linear regression, the authors analysed data of 1094 enterprises. Results show that PdM significantly improves economic performance, with variations based on geographic scope. Regression analysis confirmed PdM as an essential predictor of performance, even after considering factors like company size, legal structure, and geographic scope. Enterprises with more effective cost management and lower net sales were more likely to adopt PdM, as revealed by decision tree analysis. Our findings provide empirical evidence of the economic benefits of PdM algorithms and highlight their potential to enhance competitiveness, offering a valuable foundation for business managers to make informed investment decisions and encouraging further research in other industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Nagy & Marcel Figura & Katarina Valaskova & George Lăzăroiu, 2025. "Predictive Maintenance Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence Digital Twin Technologies, and Internet of Robotic Things in Big Data-Driven Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:981-:d:1613984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey I. Vlasov & Pavel V. Grigoriev & Aleksey I. Krivoshein & Vadim A. Shakhnov & Sergey S. Filin & Vladimir S. Migalin, 2018. "Smart management of technologies: predictive maintenance of industrial equipment using wireless sensor networks," Post-Print hal-02342832, HAL.
    2. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. de Faria, Haroldo & Costa, João Gabriel Spir & Olivas, Jose Luis Mejia, 2015. "A review of monitoring methods for predictive maintenance of electric power transformers based on dissolved gas analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 201-209.
    4. Jens Passlick & Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Lukas Grützner & Dennis Eilers & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 67-87, March.
    5. Andrey I. Vlasov & Pavel V. Grigoriev & Aleksey I. Krivoshein & Aleksey I. Krivoshein & Vadim A. Shakhnov & Sergey S. Filin & Sergey S. Filin & Vladimir S. Migalin, 2018. "Smart management of technologies: predictive maintenance of industrial equipment using wireless sensor networks," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 489-502, December.
    6. Zeki Murat Çınar & Abubakar Abdussalam Nuhu & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan & Mohammed Asmael & Babak Safaei, 2020. "Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-42, October.
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    8. Milos Maryska & Petr Doucek & Lea Nedomova & Pavel Sladek, 2018. "The Energy Industry in the Czech Republic: On the Way to the Internet of Things," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, June.
    9. David Golightly & Genovefa Kefalidou & Sarah Sharples, 2018. "A cross-sector analysis of human and organisational factors in the deployment of data-driven predictive maintenance," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 627-648, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wadim Strielkowski & Andrey Vlasov & Kirill Selivanov & Konstantin Muraviev & Vadim Shakhnov, 2023. "Prospects and Challenges of the Machine Learning and Data-Driven Methods for the Predictive Analysis of Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Andrey I. Vlasov & Ivan V. Gudoshnikov & Vladimir P. Zhalnin & Aksultan T. Kadyr & Vadim A. Shakhnov, 2020. "Market for memristors and data mining memory structures for promising smart systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 98-115, December.
    3. Jaroslav Vrchota & Martin Pech & Ivona Švepešová, 2022. "Precision Agriculture Technologies for Crop and Livestock Production in the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Andrey I. Vlasov & Boris V. Artemiev & Kirill V. Selivanov & Kirill S. Mironov & Jasur O. Isroilov, 2022. "Predictive Control Algorithm for A Variable Load Hybrid Power System on the Basis of Power Output Forecast," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 1-7, May.
    6. Peters, Lennart & Madlener, Reinhard, 2017. "Economic evaluation of maintenance strategies for ground-mounted solar photovoltaic plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 264-280.
    7. Wu, Shaomin & Wu, Di & Peng, Rui, 2023. "Considering greenhouse gas emissions in maintenance optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1135-1145.
    8. Mai, Yuxi & Xue, Jianwu & Wu, Bei, 2023. "Optimal maintenance policy for systems with environment-modulated degradation and random shocks considering imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    9. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Li, Meiyan & Wu, Bei, 2024. "Optimal condition-based opportunistic maintenance policy for two-component systems considering common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Bianca Cezara Archip & Ioan Banatean-Dunea & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2023. "Determinants of Food Waste in Cluj-Napoca (Romania): A Community-Based System Dynamics Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Torrado, Nuria, 2022. "Optimal component-type allocation and replacement time policies for parallel systems having multi-types dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Olcay Özge Ersöz & Ali Fırat İnal & Adnan Aktepe & Ahmet Kürşad Türker & Süleyman Ersöz, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Predictive Maintenance from Transportation Systems Aspect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.
    16. Max Gabriel Steiner & Anderson Diogo Spacek & João Mota Neto & Pedro Rodrigo Silva Moura & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior & Cleber Lourenço Izidoro & Luciano Dagostin Bilessimo & Jefferson Diogo Spacek, 2020. "“In Situ” Evaluation of Mechanical Wear of Mobile Contacts of Electricity Voltage Regulator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Justyna Łapińska & Iwona Escher & Joanna Górka & Agata Sudolska & Paweł Brzustewicz, 2021. "Employees’ Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Companies: The Case of Energy and Chemical Industries in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    18. André Marie Mbakop & Joseph Voufo & Florent Biyeme & Jean Raymond Lucien Meva’a, 2022. "Moving to a Flexible Shop Floor by Analyzing the Information Flow Coming from Levels of Decision on the Shop Floor of Developing Countries Using Artificial Neural Network: Cameroon, Case Study," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 255-270, June.
    19. Vladimir Rykov & Olga Kochueva & Yaroslav Rykov, 2021. "Preventive Maintenance of the k -out-of- n System with Respect to Cost-Type Criterion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Bence Márk Szeszák & István Gergely Kerékjártó & László Soltész & Péter Galambos, 2025. "Industrial Revolutions and Automation: Tracing Economic and Social Transformations of Manufacturing," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:981-:d:1613984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.