IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i16p2601-d1724274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Investment Attributes: A Mixed Logit Analysis of SDG 11

Author

Listed:
  • Ángel-Sabino Mirón Sanguino

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business, Finance and Tourism, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Elena Muñoz-Muñoz

    (Department Business Management and Sociology, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. De Elvas, s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Eva Crespo-Cebada

    (Department of Economics, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. Adolfo Suárez, s/n, 06007 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Carlos Díaz-Caro

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business, Finance and Tourism, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

Abstract

The present article analyzes the value that investors assign to financial products that contribute to Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG 11): “Sustainable Cities and Communities” by comparing investor preferences in Spain and Mexico through a choice experiment. Spain and Mexico were selected due to their contrasting levels of economic development, sustainability awareness, and regulatory maturity, offering a meaningful basis for a cross-country comparison. Preferences for investment funds that promote SDG 11 are examined by evaluating key attributes such as financial institution type, expected return, risk level, and explicit contribution to SDG 11. The results, estimated using a mixed logit model applied to a choice experiment with 568 respondents, evaluating attributes such as institution type, return, risk, and contribution to SDG 11, reveal strong risk aversion and a differentiated willingness to pay for sustainable attributes, particularly among Spanish investors. Relevant differences between the two countries emerge, suggesting the need for tailored strategies to foster sustainable investment, especially in Mexico, where sustainability is less valued in investment decisions. The policy implications include the need for investment approaches and communication strategies that are adapted to national contexts. This article concludes with recommendations for designing financial products that better align with the values and expectations of responsible investors, particularly regarding sustainable cities and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ángel-Sabino Mirón Sanguino & Elena Muñoz-Muñoz & Eva Crespo-Cebada & Carlos Díaz-Caro, 2025. "Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Investment Attributes: A Mixed Logit Analysis of SDG 11," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2601-:d:1724274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/16/2601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/16/2601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margot Hill Clarvis & Erin Bohensky & Masaru Yarime, 2015. "Can Resilience Thinking Inform Resilience Investments? Learning from Resilience Principles for Disaster Risk Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Zoomers, Annelies & van Noorloos, Femke & Otsuki, Kei & Steel, Griet & van Westen, Guus, 2017. "The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 242-252.
    3. Nick Hanley & Robert Wright & Vic Adamowicz, 1998. "Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 413-428, April.
    4. Hoyos, David, 2010. "The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1595-1603, June.
    5. Rosa Ana Jiménez-Expósito & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Pablo Fernández-Ans & Gianluca Stasi & Carmen Díaz-López & Ángela Barrios-Padura, 2022. "Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Constructive Patterns in Vulnerable Communities: Habitat for Humanity’s Sustainable Housing Prototypes in El Salvador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    7. Yanjiao Song & Chuanyong Zhang, 2020. "City size and housing purchase intention: Evidence from rural–urban migrants in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1866-1886, July.
    8. Craig E. Jones, 2023. "Transit-Oriented Development and Suburban Gentrification: A “Natural Reality” of Refugee Displacement in Metro Vancouver," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 533-552, May.
    9. Laurentiu Nicolae Pricope & Valentin Marian Antohi & Alina Meca & Angela Buboi (Danaila) & Costinela Fortea & Monica Laura Zlati, 2024. "The New European Development Scoreboard for SDG11 at the European Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Apostolakis, George & van Dijk, Gert & Kraanen, Frido & Blomme, Robert J., 2018. "Examining socially responsible investment preferences: A discrete choice conjoint experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 83-96.
    11. Stefanía Carolina Posadas & Silvia Ruiz-Blanco & Belen Fernandez-Feijoo & Lara Tarquinio, 2023. "Institutional isomorphism under the test of Non-financial Reporting Directive. Evidence from Italy and Spain," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(7), pages 26-48, January.
    12. Luis Bettencourt & Geoffrey West, 2010. "A unified theory of urban living," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7318), pages 912-913, October.
    13. Wu, Dongyu & Zhang, Yingheng & Xiang, Qiaojun, 2024. "Could improving public transport accessibility reduce road traffic carbon dioxide emissions? A simulation-based counterfactual analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Gutsche, Gunnar & Ziegler, Andreas, 2019. "Which private investors are willing to pay for sustainable investments? Empirical evidence from stated choice experiments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 193-214.
    15. Cociña, Camila & Frediani, Alexandre Apsan & Acuto, Michele & Levy, Caren, 2019. "Knowledge translation in global urban agendas: A history of research-practice encounters in the Habitat conferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 130-141.
    16. Tobias Ihle & Ellen Jahr & Dörte Martens & Holger Muehlan & Silke Schmidt, 2024. "Health Effects of Participation in Creating Urban Green Spaces—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Yuhan Shao & Xinyu Xu & Like Jiang & Romain Crastes dit Sourd, 2020. "Economic Valuation of the Renewal of Urban Streets: A Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Harasheh, Murad & Bouteska, Ahmed & Manita, Riadh, 2024. "Investors' preferences for sustainable investments: Evidence from the U.S. using an experimental approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Emily Lancsar & Denzil G. Fiebig & Arne Risa Hole, 2017. "Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 697-716, July.
    20. Fredrik Carlsson & Peter Martinsson, 2003. "Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 281-294, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harasheh, Murad & Bouteska, Ahmed & Manita, Riadh, 2024. "Investors' preferences for sustainable investments: Evidence from the U.S. using an experimental approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Muñoz-Muñoz, E. & Crespo-Cebada, E. & Mirón-Sanguino, A.S. & Díaz-Caro, C., 2025. "Investors personality correlates with sustainability preferences in investment – A choice experiment with Spanish investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Gunnar Gutsche & Miwa Nakai & Toshi H. Arimura, 2021. "Individual Sustainable Investment in Japan," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 2006, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    4. Gunnar Gutsche & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "Investment Barriers and Labeling Schemes for Socially Responsible Investments," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 111-157, April.
    5. Lucía de Carlos Fraile & Eva Crespo-Cebada & à ngel Sabino Mirón-Sanguino & Carlos Díaz-Caro, 2023. "Heterogeneity in investment behavior in sustainable products: the case of thematic funds," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 115-120.
    6. Mulatu, Dawit W. & van der Veen, Anne & van Oel, Pieter R., 2014. "Farm households' preferences for collective and individual actions to improve water-related ecosystem services: The Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 22-33.
    7. de Ayala, Amaia & Hoyos, David & Mariel, Petr, 2015. "Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 79-96.
    8. Draganac, Dragana & Lu, Kelin, 2025. "Pricing asset beyond financial fundamentals: The impact of prosocial preference and image concerns," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Richard T. Carson & Miko_aj Czajkowski, 2014. "The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 9, pages 202-235, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Chiadmi, Ines & Traoré, Sidnoma Abdoul Aziz & Salles, Jean-Michel, 2020. "Asian tiger mosquito far from home: Assessing the impact of invasive mosquitoes on the French Mediterranean littoral," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Mai-Thi Ta & Léa Tardieu & Harold Levrel, 2022. "Characterizing the Demand Side of Urban Greening to Inform Urban Planning – A Discrete Choice Experiment in the Paris Metropolitan Region," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 132(6), pages 907-949.
    12. Araña, Jorge E. & León, Carmelo J., 2013. "Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments: Evidence from measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers demand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 53-61.
    13. Christian A. Oberst & Reinhard Madlener, 2015. "Prosumer Preferences Regarding the Adoption of Micro†Generation Technologies: Empirical Evidence for German Homeowners," Working Papers 2015.07, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    14. Sofía Monroy-Sais & Eduardo García-Frapolli & Francisco Mora & Margaret Skutsch & Alejandro Casas & Peter Rijnaldus Wilhelmus Gerritsen & David González-Jiménez, 2018. "Exploring How Land Tenure Affects Farmers’ Landscape Values: Evidence from a Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Nannan Kang & Erda Wang & Yang Yu, 2019. "Valuing forest park attributes by giving consideration to the tourist satisfaction," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(5), pages 711-733, August.
    16. Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli & Antonietta Cosentino & Mara Del Baldo & Angela Magistro, 2024. "Feminist Economics and Feminist Accounting in Dialogue: The Contribution to World Inequalities and Ecological Emergencies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 202-202, January.
    17. Kaleb S. Jada & Mequanint B. Melesse & Marrit Berg, 2023. "The effects of safety certification and nutrition messaging on the demand for nutritionally enhanced food in urban Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 395-409, April.
    18. Namhee Kim & Miju Kim & Sangkwon Lee & Chi-Ok Oh, 2023. "Comparing Stakeholders’ Economic Values for the Institution of Payments for Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Tomás del Barrio Casto & William Nilsson & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2013. "How wrong can you be, without noticing? Further evidence on speci?cation errors in the Conditional Logit," Working Papers 1318, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    20. Ansell, Christopher K. & Bartenberger, Martin, 2016. "Varieties of experimentalism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 64-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2601-:d:1724274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.