IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i11p1885-d1671949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Portfolio Return Classification Using Price-Aware Logistic Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Yakubu Suleiman Baguda

    (Information Systems Department, Faculty of Computing & Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hani Moaiteq AlJahdali

    (Information Systems Department, Faculty of Computing & Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Altyeb Altaher Taha

    (Information Technology Department, Faculty of Computing & Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The dynamic and uncertain nature of financial markets presents significant challenges in accurately predicting portfolio returns due to inherent volatility and instability. This study investigates the potential of logistic regression to enhance the accuracy and robustness of return classification models, addressing challenges in dynamic portfolio optimization. We propose a price-aware logistic regression (PALR) framework to classify dynamic portfolio returns. This approach integrates price movements as key features alongside traditional portfolio optimization techniques, enabling the identification and analysis of patterns and relationships within historical financial data. Unlike conventional methods, PALR dynamically adapts to market trends by incorporating historical price data and derived indicators, leading to more accurate classification of portfolio returns. Historical market data from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and Hang Seng Index (HSI) were used to train and test the model. The proposed scheme achieves an accuracy of 99.88%, a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0006, and an AUC of 99.94% on the DJIA dataset. When evaluated on the HSI dataset, it attains a classification accuracy of 99.89%, an AUC of 99.89%, and an MSE of 0.011. The results demonstrate that PALR significantly improves classification accuracy and AUC while reducing MSE compared to conventional techniques. The proposed PALR model serves as a valuable tool for return classification and optimization, enabling investors, assets, and portfolio managers to make more informed and effective decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yakubu Suleiman Baguda & Hani Moaiteq AlJahdali & Altyeb Altaher Taha, 2025. "Dynamic Portfolio Return Classification Using Price-Aware Logistic Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1885-:d:1671949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingqing Ye & Baoding Liu, 2023. "Uncertain hypothesis test for uncertain differential equations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 195-211, June.
    2. Mei, Xiaoling & Nogales, Francisco J., 2018. "Portfolio selection with proportional transaction costs and predictability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 131-151.
    3. Nicolae Gârleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2013. "Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(6), pages 2309-2340, December.
    4. Collin-Dufresne, Pierre & Daniel, Kent & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2020. "Liquidity regimes and optimal dynamic asset allocation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 379-406.
    5. Zhang, Jinqing & Jin, Zeyu & An, Yunbi, 2017. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with ambiguity aversion," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 95-109.
    6. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Equilibrium returns with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 569-601, July.
    7. Tobek, Ondrej & Hronec, Martin, 2021. "Does it pay to follow anomalies research? Machine learning approach with international evidence," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Sang Il Lee & Seong Joon Yoo, 2017. "Threshold-Based Portfolio: The Role of the Threshold and Its Applications," Papers 1709.09822, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    9. Waichon Lio & Baoding Liu, 2018. "Uncertain data envelopment analysis with imprecisely observed inputs and outputs," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 357-373, September.
    10. Lotfi Boudabsa & Damir Filipović, 2025. "Ensemble learning for portfolio valuation and risk management," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 421-442, March.
    11. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Equilibrium Returns with Transaction Costs," Post-Print hal-01569408, HAL.
    12. Azaz Hassan Khan & Abdullah Shah & Abbas Ali & Rabia Shahid & Zaka Ullah Zahid & Malik Umar Sharif & Tariqullah Jan & Mohammad Haseeb Zafar, 2023. "A performance comparison of machine learning models for stock market prediction with novel investment strategy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Chang, Hao, 2015. "Dynamic mean–variance portfolio selection with liability and stochastic interest rate," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 172-182.
    14. Guo, Sini & Yu, Lean & Li, Xiang & Kar, Samarjit, 2016. "Fuzzy multi-period portfolio selection with different investment horizons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1026-1035.
    15. Zhang, Cheng & Gong, Xiaomin & Zhang, Jingshu & Chen, Zhiwei, 2023. "Dynamic portfolio allocation for financial markets: A perspective of competitive-cum-compensatory strategy," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Yifeng Guo & Xingyu Fu & Yuyan Shi & Mingwen Liu, 2018. "Robust Log-Optimal Strategy with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1805.00205, arXiv.org.
    17. Kaijian He & Qian Yang & Lei Ji & Jingcheng Pan & Yingchao Zou, 2023. "Financial Time Series Forecasting with the Deep Learning Ensemble Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Michael Johannes & Arthur Korteweg & Nicholas Polson, 2014. "Sequential Learning, Predictability, and Optimal Portfolio Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(2), pages 611-644, April.
    19. Gârleanu, Nicolae & Pedersen, Lasse Heje, 2016. "Dynamic portfolio choice with frictions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 487-516.
    20. van Staden, Pieter M. & Dang, Duy-Minh & Forsyth, Peter A., 2021. "The surprising robustness of dynamic Mean-Variance portfolio optimization to model misspecification errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 774-792.
    21. Bruno Bouchard & Masaaki Fukasawa & Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Equilibrium Returns with Transaction Costs," Papers 1707.08464, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Bensoussan & Guiyuan Ma & Chi Chung Siu & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam, 2022. "Dynamic mean–variance problem with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 267-300, April.
    2. Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2019. "Dynamic portfolio choice with return predictability and transaction costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 976-988.
    3. Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2022. "Portfolio choice with return predictability and small trading frictions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Xiaofei Shi & Chen Yang, 2020. "An Equilibrium Model for the Cross-Section of Liquidity Premia," Papers 2011.13625, arXiv.org.
    5. Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung & Zhu, Song-Ping, 2020. "Optimal investment and consumption with return predictability and execution costs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 408-419.
    6. Masamitsu Ohnishi & Makoto Shimoshimizu, 2022. "Optimal Pair–Trade Execution with Generalized Cross–Impact," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 253-289, June.
    7. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Dylan Possamai, 2019. "Equilibrium Asset Pricing with Transaction Costs," Papers 1901.10989, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    8. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2021. "Deep Learning Algorithms for Hedging with Frictions," Papers 2111.01931, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    9. Peter Bank & Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, 2021. "Liquidity in competitive dealer markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 827-856, July.
    10. Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Marcel Nutz & Xiaowei Tan, 2020. "Asset pricing with heterogeneous beliefs and illiquidity," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1392-1421, October.
    11. Lukas Gonon & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Xiaofei Shi, 2021. "Asset pricing with general transaction costs: Theory and numerics," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 595-648, April.
    12. Lukas Gonon & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Xiaofei Shi, 2019. "Asset Pricing with General Transaction Costs: Theory and Numerics," Papers 1905.05027, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    13. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Equilibrium asset pricing with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 231-275, April.
    14. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Marcel Nutz & Xiaowei Tan, 2019. "Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Illiquidity," Papers 1905.05730, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    15. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2023. "Deep learning algorithms for hedging with frictions," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 113-147, March.
    16. Alessandro Micheli & Johannes Muhle‐Karbe & Eyal Neuman, 2023. "Closed‐loop Nash competition for liquidity," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1082-1118, October.
    17. Yao, Haixiang & Li, Danping & Wu, Huiling, 2022. "Dynamic trading with uncertain exit time and transaction costs in a general Markov market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Xiao Chen & Jin Hyuk Choi & Kasper Larsen & Duane J. Seppi, 2021. "Learning about latent dynamic trading demand," Papers 2105.13401, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    19. Xiao Chen & Jin Hyuk Choi & Kasper Larsen & Duane J. Seppi, 2023. "Price impact in Nash equilibria," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 305-340, April.
    20. Jin Hyuk Choi & Kim Weston, 2021. "Endogenous noise trackers in a Radner equilibrium," Papers 2108.00973, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1885-:d:1671949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.