IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i6p819-d1354921.html

Optimizing the Economic Order Quantity Using Fuzzy Theory and Machine Learning Applied to a Pharmaceutical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Kalaiarasi Kalaichelvan

    (Research Department of Mathematics, Cauvery College for Women (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirappalli 620018, Tamil Nadu, India
    Department of Mathematics, Srinivas University, Mangalore 574146, Karnataka, India)

  • Soundaria Ramalingam

    (Research Department of Mathematics, Cauvery College for Women (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirappalli 620018, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani

    (Department of Mathematics, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore 641202, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Víctor Leiva

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362807, Chile)

  • Cecilia Castro

    (Centre of Mathematics, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

Abstract

In this article, we present a novel methodology for inventory management in the pharmaceutical industry, considering the nature of its supply chain. Traditional inventory models often fail to capture the particularities of the pharmaceutical sector, characterized by limited storage space, product degradation, and trade credits. To address these particularities, using fuzzy logic, we propose models that are adaptable to real-world scenarios. The proposed models are designed to reduce total costs for both vendors and clients, a gap not explored in the existing literature. Our methodology employs pentagonal fuzzy number (PFN) arithmetic and Kuhn–Tucker optimization. Additionally, the integration of the naive Bayes (NB) classifier and the use of the Weka artificial intelligence suite increase the effectiveness of our model in complex decision-making environments. A key finding is the high classification accuracy of the model, with the NB classifier correctly categorizing approximately 95.9% of the scenarios, indicating an operational efficiency. This finding is complemented by the model capability to determine the optimal production quantity, considering cost factors related to manufacturing and transportation, which is essential in minimizing overall inventory costs. Our methodology, based on machine learning and fuzzy logic, enhances the inventory management in dynamic sectors like the pharmaceutical industry. While our focus is on a single-product scenario between suppliers and buyers, future research hopes to extend this focus to wider contexts, as epidemic conditions and other applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalaiarasi Kalaichelvan & Soundaria Ramalingam & Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani & Víctor Leiva & Cecilia Castro, 2024. "Optimizing the Economic Order Quantity Using Fuzzy Theory and Machine Learning Applied to a Pharmaceutical Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:819-:d:1354921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/6/819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/6/819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aykroyd, Robert G. & Leiva, Víctor & Ruggeri, Fabrizio, 2019. "Recent developments of control charts, identification of big data sources and future trends of current research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 221-232.
    2. Makoena Sebatjane & Olufemi Adetunji, 2024. "A four-echelon supply chain inventory model for growing items with imperfect quality and errors in quality inspection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(1), pages 327-359, April.
    3. Dong, Yan & Xu, Kefeng, 2002. "A supply chain model of vendor managed inventory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 75-95, April.
    4. Wee, H.M. & Yu, Jonas & Chen, M.C., 2007. "Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Yuming & Lan, Hongjie, 2025. "Simulation study of pharmaceutical supply chains based on system dynamics," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani & Kalaiarasi Kalaichelvan & Soundaria Ramalingam & Mohamed Biomy & Taha Radwan, 2025. "Optimizing Inventory Costs in Manufacturing Systems Using Trapezoidal and Pentagonal Fuzzy Numbers," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
    3. Shireen Al-Hourani & Dua Weraikat, 2025. "A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (PSC) Resilience: Current Trends and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pentico, David W. & Drake, Matthew J. & Toews, Carl, 2009. "The deterministic EPQ with partial backordering: A new approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 624-636, June.
    2. Mena, Carlos & Terry, Leon A. & Williams, Adrian & Ellram, Lisa, 2014. "Causes of waste across multi-tier supply networks: Cases in the UK food sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 144-158.
    3. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    4. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    5. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Shokr, Iman & Konstantaras, Ioannis & VafaeiNejad, Mahyar, 2020. "Stock replenishment policies for a vendor-managed inventory in a retailing system," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Karzan Ghafour, 2017. "The Role of Items Quantity Constraint to Control the Optimal Economic Order Quantity," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-61, September.
    7. Dasgupta, Sudipto & Chen, Chen & Huynh, Thanh & Xia, Ying, 2020. "Product Market Competition and the Relocation of Economic Activity: Evidence from the Supply Chain," CEPR Discussion Papers 15056, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Sule Birim & Cigdem Sofyalioglu, 2017. "Evaluating vendor managed inventory systems: how incentives can benefit supply chain partners," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, January.
    9. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    10. Katherinne Salas-Navarro & Whady F. Florez & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2024. "A vendor-managed inventory model for a three-layer supply chain considering exponential demand, imperfect system, and remanufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 329-371, January.
    11. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    12. Darwish, M.A. & Odah, O.M., 2010. "Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 473-484, August.
    13. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2014. "Joint pricing and ordering policy for two echelon imperfect production inventory model with two cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 229-238.
    14. Ahmad Kamal Mohd Nor & Srinivasa Rao Pedapati & Masdi Muhammad & Víctor Leiva, 2022. "Abnormality Detection and Failure Prediction Using Explainable Bayesian Deep Learning: Methodology and Case Study with Industrial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-37, February.
    15. Basim S. O. Alsaedi, 2024. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Model with a Setup Cost Reduction Policy for Imperfect Items under Learning in a Cloudy Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-33, May.
    16. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    17. Lu, Xin & Shang, Jennifer & Wu, Shin-yi & Hegde, Gajanan G. & Vargas, Luis & Zhao, Daozhi, 2015. "Impacts of supplier hubris on inventory decisions and green manufacturing endeavors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 121-132.
    18. Chiu, Singa Wang & Liang, Gang-Ming & Chiu, Yuan-Shyi Peter & Chiu, Tiffany, 2019. "Production planning incorporating issues of reliability and backlogging with service level constraint," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    19. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    20. Sarker, Bhaba R., 2014. "Consignment stocking policy models for supply chain systems: A critical review and comparative perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 52-67.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:819-:d:1354921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.