IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i22p4574-d1276117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Waste Hierarchy at the Business Level: An International Outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán

    (Departamento de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Santiago Compostela, Av. Burgo, s/n, 15782 Santiago Compostela, Spain)

  • Sónia Monteiro

    (CICF—Centro de Investigação em Contabilidade e Fiscalidade del Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Fátima David

    (Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico da Guarda, 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal)

  • Francisco M. Somohano-Rodríguez

    (Departamento de Administración de Empresas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Cantabria, Av. de los Castros, 56, 39005 Santander, Spain)

Abstract

Sustainable waste management is becoming a common goal in most countries. The national legal framework largely determines the waste management practices, the socio-demographic characteristics, and the economic level of the country and, in the case of businesses, the type of business, the industry in which it operates, and the sector-specific regulations to which it is subject. This paper aims to examine the importance that firms worldwide place on waste management by analyzing the evolution over time of waste management practices used by firms and how this evolution has varied across countries and sectors. The X-STATIS technique is applied to conduct a multivariate analysis using data from seven-hundred and eighty firms from twenty-eight countries and eight sectors from 2016 to 2020 (3900 observations). The results show that waste management has become more important worldwide over time. In terms of waste management practices, the management of the impacts of generated waste occupies the first place in the ranking, performed by 97.5% of the sampled firms in 2020; this is followed by the methods of the disposal of non-hazardous waste (66%) while waste prevention policies occupy the last place in the ranking (30.6%). At the country level, the most committed countries are Taiwan (74.3%) and Finland (70.6%), followed by France, Spain, Russia, Italy, and the United States (60.0–66.9%); meanwhile, the least committed countries are the United Kingdom, Australia, and Ireland (35–36%). At the sector level, consumer goods (63.7%) and oil and gas (63.0%) lead the ranking while the least committed sectors are technology and telecommunications (50.0%) and real estate services (49.3%). The evolution of companies’ commitment to waste management is gradual in all sectors, with oil and gas at the top, with a percentage variation of 21.4%, and consumer goods at the bottom, with 5.2%. In addition, our results suggest that the sector influences waste management practices more than the country of origin of the firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Sónia Monteiro & Fátima David & Francisco M. Somohano-Rodríguez, 2023. "The Waste Hierarchy at the Business Level: An International Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4574-:d:1276117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen C. Rodríguez-Martínez & Mitzi Cubilla-Montilla & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2023. "X-STATIS: A Multivariate Approach to Characterize the Evolution of E-Participation, from a Global Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Roza Zhamiyeva & Gulmira Sultanbekova & Gulnara Balgimbekova & Kuat Mussin & Maral Abzalbekova & Murat Kozhanov, 2022. "Problems of the effectiveness of the implementation of international agreements in the field of waste management: the study of the experience of Kazakhstan in the context of the applicability of Europ," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 177-199, March.
    3. Víctor Amor-Esteban & Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Mª-Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2018. "Analysing the Effect of Legal System on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the Country Level, from a Multivariate Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 435-452, November.
    4. Victoria Bogdan & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa & Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Dorina-Nicoleta Popa & Mărioara Beleneși, 2022. "Tracking Waste Management Information Disclosure Behavior Connected to Financial Performance through Moderating Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Khandoker M. Maniruzzaman & Umar Lawal Dano & Faez S. AlShihri & Maher S. AlShammari & Sayed Mohammed S. Ahmed & Wadee Ahmed Ghanem Al-Gehlani & Tareq I. Alrawaf, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel A. Martínez-Regalado & Cinthia Leonora Murillo-Avalos & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mónica Jiménez-Hernández & José Luis Vicente-Villardón, 2021. "Using HJ-Biplot and External Logistic Biplot as Machine Learning Methods for Corporate Social Responsibility Practices for Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Reem F. Alruwaili & Nourah Alsadaan & Abeer Nuwayfi Alruwaili & Afrah Ghazi Alrumayh, 2023. "Unveiling the Symbiosis of Environmental Sustainability and Infection Control in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.
    4. Thomas Akintayo & Juha Hämäläinen & Pertti Pasanen & Iniobong John, 2023. "A Rapid Review of Sociocultural Dimensions in Nigeria’s Solid Waste Management Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Marshall, Andrew & Rao, Sandeep & Roy, Partha P. & Thapa, Chandra, 2022. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Mylene G. Dinglasan Ed. D & Carmencita M. Duenas Ed. D, 2024. "Solid Waste Management Practices of Philippine Christian University-Manila," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 990-995, February.
    7. Abdul-Wahab Tahiru & Samuel Jerry Cobbina & Wilhemina Asare & Silas Uwumborge Takal, 2024. "Unlocking Energy from Waste: A Comprehensive Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Recovery Potential in Ghana," World, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, April.
    8. Egidijus Buivydas & Kęstutis Navickas & Kęstutis Venslauskas, 2024. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Methane Slip in Biogas Upgrading Based on Permeable Membrane Technology with Variable Methane Concentration in Raw Biogas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Rajesh Kumar Srivastava & Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Piotr Prus & Roman Sass, 2023. "Municipal-Based Biowaste Conversion for Developing and Promoting Renewable Energy in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Abdelrahman M. Farouk & Afiqah R. Radzi & Noor Suraya Romali & Mohamed Farouk & Mohamed Elgamal & Raouf Hassan & Mazen M. Omer & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2024. "Performance Indicators for Assessing Environmental Management Plan Implementation in Water Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Andrew Adewale Alola & Glory Chiyoru Dike & Uju Violet Alola, 2022. "The Role of Legal System and Socioeconomic Aspects in the Environmental Quality Drive of the Global South," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 953-972, September.
    12. Xinyu Zhuang & Xin Li & Yisong Xu, 2022. "How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4574-:d:1276117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.