IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i23p4554-d990753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural Network-Based Hybrid Forecasting Models for Time-Varying Passenger Flow of Intercity High-Speed Railways

Author

Listed:
  • Huanyin Su

    (School of Railway Tracks and Transportation, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China)

  • Shuting Peng

    (School of Railway Tracks and Transportation, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China)

  • Shanglin Mo

    (School of Railway Tracks and Transportation, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China)

  • Kaixin Wu

    (School of Railway Tracks and Transportation, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China)

Abstract

Time-varying passenger flow is the input data in the optimization design of intercity high-speed railway transportation products, and it plays an important role. Therefore, it is necessary to predict the origin-destination (O-D) passenger flow at different times of the day in combination with the stable time-varying characteristics. In this paper, three neural network-based hybrid forecasting models are designed and compared, named Variational Mode Decomposition-Multilayer Perceptron (VMD-MLP), Variational Mode Decomposition-Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network (VMD-GRU), and Variational Mode Decomposition-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network (VMD-Bi-LSTM). First, the time-varying characteristics of passenger travel demand under different time granularities are analyzed and extracted by the VMD method. Second, three neural network prediction models are constructed to predict the passenger flow sequence after VMD decomposition and reconstruction. Experimental analysis is performed on the Guangzhou Zhuhai intercity high-speed railway in China, and the passenger flow at different time periods of the day under different time granularities is predicted. The following results were found: (i) The number of hidden neurons and the number of iterations of the hybrid forecasting model have a great impact on the prediction accuracy. The error of the VMD-MLP model fluctuates less and it performs more smoothly than both the VMD-GRU model and the VMD-Bi-LSTM model. (ii) The VMD-MLP, VMD-GRU, and VMD-Bi-LSTM models can basically reduce the MAPE error to less than 10%. With the increase of time granularity, RMSE and MAE errors tend to gradually increase, while the MAPE error tends to gradually decrease. (iii) For passenger flow under a smaller time granularity, the prediction accuracy of the VMD-MLP model is higher, while for passenger flow under a larger time granularity, the prediction accuracy of the VMD-GRU and VMD-Bi-LSTM models is higher. (iv) The proposed neural network-based hybrid models outperform the existing models and the hybrid models perform better than the single models.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanyin Su & Shuting Peng & Shanglin Mo & Kaixin Wu, 2022. "Neural Network-Based Hybrid Forecasting Models for Time-Varying Passenger Flow of Intercity High-Speed Railways," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:23:p:4554-:d:990753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/23/4554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Gao, Ruhu, 2015. "Train scheduling for minimizing passenger waiting time with time-dependent demand and skip-stop patterns: Nonlinear integer programming models with linear constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 117-135.
    2. Mor Kaspi & Tal Raviv, 2013. "Service-Oriented Line Planning and Timetabling for Passenger Trains," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 295-311, August.
    3. Jin, Feng & Li, Yongwu & Sun, Shaolong & Li, Hongtao, 2020. "Forecasting air passenger demand with a new hybrid ensemble approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Huanyin Su & Shuting Peng & Lianbo Deng & Weixiang Xu & Qiongfang Zeng & Luca D'Acierno, 2021. "Optimal Differential Pricing for Intercity High-Speed Railway Services with Time-Dependent Demand and Passenger Choice Behaviors under Capacity Constraints," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, November.
    5. Huanyin Su & Wencong Tao & Xinlei Hu, 2019. "A Line Planning Approach for High-Speed Rail Networks with Time-Dependent Demand and Capacity Constraints," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huanyin Su & Shanglin Mo & Shuting Peng, 2023. "Short-Term Prediction of Time-Varying Passenger Flow for Intercity High-Speed Railways: A Neural Network Model Based on Multi-Source Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tangjian Wei & Feng Shi & Guangming Xu, 2019. "Estimation of Time-Varying Passenger Demand for High Speed Rail System," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-24, March.
    2. Yan, Fei & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Combined line planning and train timetabling for strongly heterogeneous railway lines with direct connections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 20-46.
    3. Shuo Zhao & Xiwei Mi & Zhenyi Li, 2019. "A Stop-Probability Approach for O-D Service Frequency on High-Speed Railway Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Wenliang Zhou & Wenzhuang Fan & Xiaorong You & Lianbo Deng, 2019. "Demand-Oriented Train Timetabling Integrated with Passenger Train-Booking Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-34, September.
    5. Tatsuki Yamauchi & Mizuyo Takamatsu & Shinji Imahori, 2023. "Optimizing train stopping patterns for congestion management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Lu, Gongyuan & Zhong, Qingwei & Yan, Xu & Zhou, Xuesong, 2022. "Integrated line planning and train timetabling through price-based cross-resolution feedback mechanism," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 240-277.
    7. Chen, Yao & An, Kun, 2021. "Integrated optimization of bus bridging routes and timetables for rail disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 484-498.
    8. Xu, Guangming & Liu, Wei & Wu, Runfa & Yang, Hai, 2021. "A double time-scale passenger assignment model for high-speed railway networks with continuum capacity approximation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Wenliang Zhou & Xiang Li & Xin Shi, 2023. "Joint Optimization of Time-Dependent Line Planning and Differential Pricing with Passenger Train Choice in High-Speed Railway Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Tian, Xiaopeng & Niu, Huimin, 2020. "Optimization of demand-oriented train timetables under overtaking operations: A surrogate-dual-variable column generation for eliminating indivisibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 143-173.
    11. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2021. "Train timetabling with stop-skipping, passenger flow, and platform choice considerations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 52-74.
    12. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "An integrated train service plan optimization model with variable demand: A team-based scheduling approach with dual cost information in a layered network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-28.
    13. Limsawasd, Charinee & Athigakunagorn, Nathee & Khathawatcharakun, Phattadon & Boonmee, Atiwat, 2022. "Skip-Stop Strategy Patterns optimization to enhance mass transit operation under physical distancing policy due to COVID-19 pandemic outbreak," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 225-238.
    14. Polinder, G.-J. & Cacchiani, V. & Schmidt, M.E. & Huisman, D., 2020. "An iterative heuristic for passenger-centric train timetabling with integrated adaption times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-006-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Ali Shahabi & Sadigh Raissi & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Meysam Rafei, 2021. "Designing a resilient skip-stop schedule in rapid rail transit using a simulation-based optimization methodology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1691-1721, September.
    16. Rolf N. Van Lieshout, 2021. "Integrated Periodic Timetabling and Vehicle Circulation Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 768-790, May.
    17. Wang, Sen & Gao, Yi, 2021. "A literature review and citation analyses of air travel demand studies published between 2010 and 2020," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Yuzhao Zhang & Jianqiang Wang & Wenjuan Cai, 2019. "Passengers’ Demand Characteristics Experimental Analysis of EMU Trains with Sleeping Cars in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Nie, Wei & Li, Hao & Xiao, Na & Yang, Hao & Jiang, Zhishu & Buhigiro, Nsabimana, 2021. "Modeling and solving the last-shift period train scheduling problem in subway networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 569(C).
    20. Mo, Pengli & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yang, Lixing & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "An exact method for the integrated optimization of subway lines operation strategies with asymmetric passenger demand and operating costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 283-321.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:23:p:4554-:d:990753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.