IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i21p3940-d951775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conic Duality for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Khoirunnisa Rohadatul Aisy Muslihin

    (Department of Mathematics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Endang Rusyaman

    (Department of Mathematics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Diah Chaerani

    (Department of Mathematics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

Duality theory is important in finding solutions to optimization problems. For example, in linear programming problems, the primal and dual problem pairs are closely related, i.e., if the optimal solution of one problem is known, then the optimal solution for the other problem can be obtained easily. In order for an optimization problem to be solved through the dual, the first step is to formulate its dual problem and analyze its characteristics. In this paper, we construct the dual model of an uncertain linear multi-objective optimization problem as well as its weak and strong duality criteria via conic duality. The multi-objective form of the problem is solved using the utility function method. In addition, the uncertainty is handled using robust optimization with ellipsoidal and polyhedral uncertainty sets. The robust counterpart formulation for the two uncertainty sets belongs to the conic optimization problem class; therefore, the dual problem can be built through conic duality. The results of the analysis show that the dual model obtained meets the weak duality, while the criteria for strong duality are identified based on the strict feasibility, boundedness, and solvability of the primal and dual problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Khoirunnisa Rohadatul Aisy Muslihin & Endang Rusyaman & Diah Chaerani, 2022. "Conic Duality for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:21:p:3940-:d:951775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/21/3940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/21/3940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. C. Wu, 2008. "Wolfe Duality for Interval-Valued Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 497-509, September.
    2. G. Wanka, 2000. "Multiobjective Control Approximation Problems: Duality and Optimality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 457-475, May.
    3. A. L. Soyster, 1973. "Technical Note—Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1154-1157, October.
    4. Gorissen, Bram L. & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & den Hertog, Dick, 2015. "A practical guide to robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-137.
    5. Caprari, Elisa & Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Molho, Elena, 2019. "Primal worst and dual best in robust vector optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 830-838.
    6. Wang, Luhao & Li, Qiqiang & Ding, Ran & Sun, Mingshun & Wang, Guirong, 2017. "Integrated scheduling of energy supply and demand in microgrids under uncertainty: A robust multi-objective optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Hao & Yang, Jun & Yang, Chao, 2019. "A robust optimization approach to multi-interval location-inventory and recharging planning for electric vehicles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 59-75.
    2. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    3. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    4. Christoph Buchheim & Jannis Kurtz, 2018. "Robust combinatorial optimization under convex and discrete cost uncertainty," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 211-238, September.
    5. Zhang, Yan & Fu, Lijun & Zhu, Wanlu & Bao, Xianqiang & Liu, Cang, 2018. "Robust model predictive control for optimal energy management of island microgrids with uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1229-1241.
    6. A. K. Bhurjee & G. Panda, 2016. "Sufficient optimality conditions and duality theory for interval optimization problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 335-348, August.
    7. Moret, Stefano & Babonneau, Frédéric & Bierlaire, Michel & Maréchal, François, 2020. "Overcapacity in European power systems: Analysis and robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Botte, Marco & Schöbel, Anita, 2019. "Dominance for multi-objective robust optimization concepts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 430-440.
    9. Aura Jalal & Aldair Alvarez & Cesar Alvarez-Cruz & Jonathan La Vega & Alfredo Moreno, 2023. "The robust multi-plant capacitated lot-sizing problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(2), pages 302-330, July.
    10. Rahim, Sahar & Wang, Zhen & Ju, Ping, 2022. "Overview and applications of Robust optimization in the avant-garde energy grid infrastructure: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    11. Kramer, Anja & Krebs, Vanessa & Schmidt, Martin, 2021. "Strictly and Γ-robust counterparts of electricity market models: Perfect competition and Nash–Cournot equilibria," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    12. Prabatha, Tharindu & Karunathilake, Hirushie & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Community-level decentralized energy system planning under uncertainty: A comparison of mathematical models for strategy development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    13. Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & Gorissen, Bram L. & den Hertog, Dick, 2019. "A survey of adjustable robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 799-813.
    14. Schmidt, M. & Schöbel, Anita & Thom, Lisa, 2019. "Min-ordering and max-ordering scalarization methods for multi-objective robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 446-459.
    15. Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Zhang, Qi & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo, 2018. "Adaptation and approximate strategies for solving the lot-sizing and scheduling problem under multistage demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 81-96.
    16. Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2018. "A robust optimization approach for itinerary planning with deadline," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 56-74.
    17. Ying Cui & Ziyu He & Jong-Shi Pang, 2021. "Nonconvex robust programming via value-function optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 411-450, March.
    18. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2011. "Duality Theory in Interval-Valued Linear Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 298-316, August.
    19. Soyster, A.L. & Murphy, F.H., 2017. "Data driven matrix uncertainty for robust linear programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 43-57.
    20. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Jordi de la Hoz, 2022. "Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:21:p:3940-:d:951775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.