IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v105y2000i2d10.1023_a1004622204554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiobjective Control Approximation Problems: Duality and Optimality

Author

Listed:
  • G. Wanka

    (Technical University Chemnitz)

Abstract

A general convex multiobjective control approximation problem is considered with respect to duality. The single objectives contain linear functionals and powers of norms as parts, measuring the distance between linear mappings of the control variable and the state variables. Moreover, linear inequality constraints are included. A dual problem is established, and weak and strong duality properties as well as necessary and sufficient optimality conditions are derived. Point-objective location problems and linear vector optimization problems turn out to be special cases of the problem investigated. Therefore, well-known duality results for linear vector optimization are obtained as special cases.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Wanka, 2000. "Multiobjective Control Approximation Problems: Duality and Optimality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 457-475, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:105:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1004622204554
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1004622204554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1004622204554
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1004622204554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durier, Roland & Michelot, Christian, 1985. "Geometrical properties of the Fermat-Weber problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 332-343, June.
    2. P. Hansen & J. Perreur & J.-F. Thisse, 1980. "Technical Note—Location Theory, Dominance, and Convexity: Some Further Results," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 1241-1250, October.
    3. Richard E. Wendell & Arthur P. Hurter, 1973. "Location Theory, Dominance, and Convexity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 314-320, February.
    4. Chalmet, Luc G. & Francis, Richard L. & Kolen, Antoon, 1981. "Finding efficient solutions for rectilinear distance location problems efficiently," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 117-124, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khoirunnisa Rohadatul Aisy Muslihin & Endang Rusyaman & Diah Chaerani, 2022. "Conic Duality for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Haijun Liu & Neng Fan & Panos M. Pardalos, 2012. "Generalized Lagrange Function and Generalized Weak Saddle Points for a Class of Multiobjective Fractional Optimal Control Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 370-381, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Carrizosa & J. B. G. Frenk, 1998. "Dominating Sets for Convex Functions with Some Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 281-295, February.
    2. M. Hakan Akyüz & Temel Öncan & İ. Kuban Altınel, 2019. "Branch and bound algorithms for solving the multi-commodity capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 1-42, August.
    3. N Aras & M Orbay & I K Altinel, 2008. "Efficient heuristics for the rectilinear distance capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 64-79, January.
    4. H. Martini & K.J. Swanepoel & G. Weiss, 2002. "The Fermat–Torricelli Problem in Normed Planes and Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 283-314, November.
    5. M. Akyüz & İ. Altınel & Temel Öncan, 2014. "Location and allocation based branch and bound algorithms for the capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 45-71, November.
    6. Roland Rathelot & Patrick Sillard, 2008. "The Importance of Local Corporate Taxes in Business Location Decisions: Evidence From French Micro Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(527), pages 499-514, March.
    7. Stefan Nickel & Justo Puerto & Antonio M. Rodriguez-Chia, 2003. "An Approach to Location Models Involving Sets as Existing Facilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 693-715, November.
    8. Carrizosa, E. & Frenk, J.B.G., 1996. "Dominating Sets for Convex Functions with some Applications," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9657-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Necati Aras & İ. Kuban Altınel & Metin Orbay, 2007. "New heuristic methods for the capacitated multi‐facility Weber problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 21-32, February.
    10. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Pawel Kalczynski, 2021. "Directional approach to gradual cover: the continuous case," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 25-47, January.
    11. B. Pelegrin & F. R. Fernandez, 1988. "Determination of efficient points in multiple‐objective location problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 697-705, December.
    12. Ndiaye, M. & Michelot, C., 1998. "Efficiency in constrained continuous location," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 288-298, January.
    13. Díaz-Báñez, J.M. & Korman, M. & Pérez-Lantero, P. & Ventura, I., 2013. "The 1-median and 1-highway problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 552-557.
    14. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    15. Carrizosa, Emilio & Rodriguez-Chia, Antonio M., 1997. "Weber problems with alternative transportation systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 87-93, February.
    16. Jack Brimberg & Robert Love & Nenad Mladenović, 2009. "Extension of the Weiszfeld procedure to a single facility minisum location model with mixed ℓ p norms," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 70(2), pages 269-283, October.
    17. Alzorba, Shaghaf & Günther, Christian & Popovici, Nicolae & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A new algorithm for solving planar multiobjective location problems involving the Manhattan norm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 35-46.
    18. Zvi Drezner & Mozart B. C. Menezes, 2016. "The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 205-226, November.
    19. Canos, M. J. & Ivorra, C. & Liern, V., 1999. "An exact algorithm for the fuzzy p-median problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 80-86, July.
    20. Avella, P. & Benati, S. & Canovas Martinez, L. & Dalby, K. & Di Girolamo, D. & Dimitrijevic, B. & Ghiani, G. & Giannikos, I. & Guttmann, N. & Hultberg, T. H. & Fliege, J. & Marin, A. & Munoz Marquez, , 1998. "Some personal views on the current state and the future of locational analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 269-287, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:105:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1004622204554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.