IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i20p3790-d942340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PN-BBN: A Petri Net-Based Bayesian Network for Anomalous Behavior Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Lu

    (School of Mathematics and Big Data, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Xianwen Fang

    (School of Mathematics and Big Data, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
    Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory for Big Data Analysis and Early Warning Technology of Coal Mine Safety, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Na Fang

    (School of Mathematics and Big Data, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

Abstract

Business process anomalous behavior detection reveals unexpected cases from event logs to ensure the trusted operation of information systems. Anomaly behavior is mainly identified through a log-to-model alignment analysis or numerical outlier detection. However, both approaches ignore the influence of probability distributions or activity relationships in process activities. Based on this concern, this paper incorporates the behavioral relationships characterized by the process model and the joint probability distribution of nodes related to suspected anomalous behaviors. Moreover, a Petri Net-Based Bayesian Network (PN-BBN) is proposed to detect anomalous behaviors based on the probabilistic inference of behavioral contexts. First, the process model is filtered based on the process structure of the process activities to identify the key regions where the suspected anomalous behaviors are located. Then, the behavioral profile of the activity is used to prune it to position the ineluctable paths that trigger these activities. Further, the model is used as the architecture for parameter learning to construct the PN-BBN. Based on this, anomaly scores are inferred based on the joint probabilities of activities related to suspected anomalous behaviors for anomaly detection under the constraints of control flow and probability distributions. Finally, PN-BBN is implemented based on the open-source frameworks PM4PY and PMGPY and evaluated from multiple metrics with synthetic and real process data. The experimental results demonstrate that PN-BBN effectively identifies anomalous process behaviors and improves the reliability of information systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Lu & Xianwen Fang & Na Fang, 2022. "PN-BBN: A Petri Net-Based Bayesian Network for Anomalous Behavior Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3790-:d:942340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Goldstein & Seiichi Uchida, 2016. "A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Sihua & Yang, Haidong & Xu, Kangkang & Zhu, Chengjiu & Zhang, Shaqing & Liu, Guosheng, 2022. "Dynamic real–time abnormal energy consumption detection and energy efficiency optimization analysis considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Adele Ravagnani & Fabrizio Lillo & Paola Deriu & Piero Mazzarisi & Francesca Medda & Antonio Russo, 2024. "Dimensionality reduction techniques to support insider trading detection," Papers 2403.00707, arXiv.org.
    3. Davide Nicola Continanza & Andrea del Monaco & Marco di Lucido & Daniele Figoli & Pasquale Maddaloni & Filippo Quarta & Giuseppe Turturiello, 2023. "Stacking machine learning models for anomaly detection: comparing AnaCredit to other banking data sets," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Data science in central banking: applications and tools, volume 59, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Priyanga Dilini Talagala & Rob J Hyndman & Kate Smith-Miles, 2019. "Anomaly Detection in High Dimensional Data," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 20/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi & Mario A Munoz & Rob J Hyndman & Kate Smith-Miles, 2018. "On normalization and algorithm selection for unsupervised outlier detection," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/18, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    6. Priyanga Dilini Talagala & Rob J Hyndman & Catherine Leigh & Kerrie Mengersen & Kate Smith-Miles, 2019. "A Feature-Based Framework for Detecting Technical Outliers in Water-Quality Data from In Situ Sensors," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    7. Piero Mazzarisi & Adele Ravagnani & Paola Deriu & Fabrizio Lillo & Francesca Medda & Antonio Russo, 2022. "A machine learning approach to support decision in insider trading detection," Papers 2212.05912, arXiv.org.
    8. Cian Ryan & Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins, 2019. "Semiautonomous Vehicle Risk Analysis: A Telematics‐Based Anomaly Detection Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1125-1140, May.
    9. Elmira Asadi-Fard & Samereh Falahatkar & Mahdi Tanha Ziyarati & Xiaodong Zhang & Mariapia Faruolo, 2023. "Assessment of RXD Algorithm Capability for Gas Flaring Detection through OLI-SWIR Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Kenichiro Nagata & Toshikazu Tsuji & Kimitaka Suetsugu & Kayoko Muraoka & Hiroyuki Watanabe & Akiko Kanaya & Nobuaki Egashira & Ichiro Ieiri, 2021. "Detection of overdose and underdose prescriptions—An unsupervised machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Ruhi Kiran Bajaj & Rebecca Mary Meiring & Fernando Beltran, 2023. "Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Tool Using Smartwatch Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Chatterjee, Joyjit & Dethlefs, Nina, 2021. "Scientometric review of artificial intelligence for operations & maintenance of wind turbines: The past, present and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Fan, Cheng & Xiao, Fu & Zhao, Yang & Wang, Jiayuan, 2018. "Analytical investigation of autoencoder-based methods for unsupervised anomaly detection in building energy data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1123-1135.
    14. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Dongsheng Zhai & Hongshen Pang, 2019. "Types of DOI errors of cited references in Web of Science with a cleaning method," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1427-1437, September.
    15. Milan Miric & Hakan Ozalp & Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz, 2023. "Trade‐offs to using standardized tools: Innovation enablers or creativity constraints?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 909-942, April.
    16. Parminder Singh & Sujatha Krishnamoorthy & Anand Nayyar & Ashish Kr Luhach & Avinash Kaur, 2019. "Soft-computing-based false alarm reduction for hierarchical data of intrusion detection system," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(10), pages 15501477198, October.
    17. Erkuş, Ekin Can & Purutçuoğlu, Vilda, 2021. "Outlier detection and quasi-periodicity optimization algorithm: Frequency domain based outlier detection (FOD)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 560-574.
    18. Durgesh Samariya & Amit Thakkar, 2023. "A Comprehensive Survey of Anomaly Detection Algorithms," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 829-850, June.
    19. Vinicius Francisco Rofatto & Marcelo Tomio Matsuoka & Ivandro Klein & Maurício Roberto Veronez & Luiz Gonzaga da Silveira Junior, 2020. "On the effects of hard and soft equality constraints in the iterative outlier elimination procedure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Perwez, Usama & Yamaguchi, Yohei & Ma, Tao & Dai, Yanjun & Shimoda, Yoshiyuki, 2022. "Multi-scale GIS-synthetic hybrid approach for the development of commercial building stock energy model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3790-:d:942340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.