IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2865-d885679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Really Ageing Systems Undergoing a Discrete Maintenance Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Radim Briš

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Jahoda

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In general, a complex system is composed of different components that are usually subject to a maintenance policy. We take into account systems containing components that are under both preventive and corrective maintenance. Preventive maintenance is considered as a failure-based preventive maintenance model, where full renewal is realized after the occurrence of every n th failure. It offers an imperfect corrective maintenance model, where each repair deteriorates the component or system lifetime, the probability distribution of which gradually changes via increasing failure rates. The reliability mathematics for unavailability quantification is demonstrated in the paper. The renewal process model, involving failure-based preventive maintenance, arises from the new corresponding renewal cycle, which is designated a real ageing process. Imperfect corrective maintenance results in an unwanted rise in the unavailability function, which can be rectified by a properly selected failure-based preventive maintenance policy; i.e., replacement of a properly selected component respecting both cost and unavailability after the occurrence of the n th failure. The number n is considered a decision variable, whereas cost is an objective function in the optimization process. The paper describes a new method for finding an optimal failure-based preventive maintenance policy for a system respecting a given reliability constraint. The decision variable n is optimally selected for each component from a set of possible realistic maintenance modes. We focus on the discrete maintenance model, where each component is realized in one or several maintenance mode(s). The fixed value of the decision variable determines a single maintenance mode, as well as the cost of the mode. The optimization process for a system is demanding in terms of computing time because, if the system contains k components, all having three maintenance modes, we need to evaluate 3 k maintenance configurations. The discrete maintenance optimization is shown with two systems adopted from the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Radim Briš & Pavel Jahoda, 2022. "Really Ageing Systems Undergoing a Discrete Maintenance Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2865-:d:885679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    2. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    3. Finkelstein, Maxim & Ludick, Zani, 2014. "On some steady-state characteristics of systems with gradual repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 17-23.
    4. Daming Lin & Ming J. Zuo & Richard C. M. Yam, 2001. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 172-183, March.
    5. Briš, Radim, 2010. "Exact reliability quantification of highly reliable systems with maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1286-1292.
    6. Pandey, Mayank & Zuo, Ming J. & Moghaddass, Ramin & Tiwari, M.K., 2013. "Selective maintenance for binary systems under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 42-51.
    7. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    8. Briš, Radim, 2008. "Parallel simulation algorithm for maintenance optimization based on directed Acyclic Graph," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 874-884.
    9. van der Weide, J.A.M. & Pandey, Mahesh D., 2015. "A stochastic alternating renewal process model for unavailability analysis of standby safety equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 97-104.
    10. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Zhang, Zhe George, 2015. "An extended optimal replacement model for a deteriorating system with inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 33-49.
    11. F. G. Badía & M. D. Berrade, 2009. "Optimum Maintenance Policy of a Periodically Inspected System under Imperfect Repair," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2009, pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Bochkov & Gurami Tsitsiashvili, 2022. "Preface to the Special Issue on Probability and Stochastic Processes with Applications to Communications, Systems and Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-4, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Radim Briš & Petr Byczanski, 2017. "On innovative stochastic renewal process models for exact unavailability quantification of highly reliable systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 617-627, December.
    3. Wu, Fan & Niknam, Seyed A. & Kobza, John E., 2015. "A cost effective degradation-based maintenance strategy under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 234-243.
    4. Zhao, Xiujie & He, Shuguang & Xie, Min, 2018. "Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 108-119.
    5. Radim Briš & Nuong Thi Thuy Tran, 2023. "Discrete Model for a Multi-Objective Maintenance Optimization Problem of Safety Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Dai, Anshu & Wang, Xin & Li, Yu & Li, Ting & He, Shuguang, 2023. "Design of a performance-based warranty policy with replacement–repair strategy and cumulative cost threshold," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr, 2013. "Effective computing algorithm for maintenance optimization of highly reliable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 77-85.
    8. Insua, David Rios & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Wilson, Simon, 2020. "Advances in Bayesian decision making in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 1-18.
    9. Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Bin & Xu, Jianyu & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance policies for warranted products under stochastic performance degradation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 150-165.
    10. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Lee, Hyunju, 2020. "An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Mayank Pandey & Ming J Zuo & Ramin Moghaddass, 2016. "Selective maintenance scheduling over a finite planning horizon," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(2), pages 162-177, April.
    12. Bris, Radim & Medonos, Sava & Wilkins, Chris & Zdráhala, Adam, 2014. "Time-dependent risk modeling of accidental events and responses in process industries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 54-66.
    13. Chun Su & Longfei Cheng, 2018. "An availability-based warranty policy considering preventive maintenance and learning effects," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 576-586, December.
    14. Jiang, Tao & Liu, Yu, 2020. "Selective maintenance strategy for systems executing multiple consecutive missions with uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    17. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    18. Chen, Jiguang & Hu, Qiying, 2015. "Optimal payment scheme when the supplier’s quality level and cost are unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 731-742.
    19. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2017. "Two new stochastic models of the failure process of a series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 763-772.
    20. Luo, Ming & Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A comprehensive analysis of warranty claims and optimal policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 144-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2865-:d:885679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.