IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v201y2020ics0951832019308786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs

Author

Listed:
  • Badía, F.G.
  • Berrade, M.D.
  • Lee, Hyunju

Abstract

In this paper we consider the inspection and maintenance of a system under two types of age-dependent failures, revealed minor failures (R) and unrevealed catastrophic failures (U). Periodic inspections every T units of time are carried out to detect U failures, leading to the system replacement when one is discovered. R failures are followed by a minor repair. In addition the system is preventively replaced at MT or after the Nth R failure whichever comes first. The costs of minimal repair and replacement after N minor failures depend on age and history of failures. Non-perfect inspections are assumed, providing false positives when no U failure has happened or false negatives when a U failure is present. The long-run cost per unit of time along with the optimum policy (T*, M*, N*) are obtained. We explore conditions under which both strategies of preventive maintenance are profitable, comparing with suboptimal policies when only one of them is performed. Maintenance of infrastructures illustrates the model conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Lee, Hyunju, 2020. "An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:201:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019308786
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019308786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Rui & Liu, Bin & Zhai, Qingqing & Wang, Wenbin, 2019. "Optimal maintenance strategy for systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 624-632.
    2. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Nielsen, Jannie Jessen & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2011. "On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 218-229.
    4. Mahmood Shafiee & Michael Patriksson & Ann-Brith Strömberg, 2013. "An Optimal Number-Dependent Preventive Maintenance Strategy for Offshore Wind Turbine Blades Considering Logistics," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-12, July.
    5. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    6. Shey-Huei Sheu & Griffith, William S. & Toshio Nakagawa, 1995. "Extended optimal replacement model with random minimal repair costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 636-649, September.
    7. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip A., 2012. "Maintenance scheduling of a protection system subject to imperfect inspection and replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 716-725.
    8. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan & Jardine, Andrew K.S., 2010. "Periodic inspection optimization model for a complex repairable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 944-952.
    9. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    10. Seyedhosseini, Seyed Mohammad & Moakedi, Hamid & Shahanaghi, Kamran, 2018. "Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 141-156.
    11. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2018. "Point Processes for Reliability Analysis," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-3-319-73540-5, January.
    12. Sheils, Emma & O’Connor, Alan & Breysse, Denys & Schoefs, Franck & Yotte, Sylvie, 2010. "Development of a two-stage inspection process for the assessment of deteriorating infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 182-194.
    13. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    14. Wang, W., 1997. "Subjective estimation of the delay time distribution in maintenance modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 516-529, June.
    15. Podofillini, Luca & Zio, Enrico & Vatn, Jørn, 2006. "Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 20-35.
    16. Zhao, Xufeng & Qian, Cunhua & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2017. "Comparisons of replacement policies with periodic times and repair numbers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 161-170.
    17. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    18. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Zhang, Zhe George, 2015. "An extended optimal replacement model for a deteriorating system with inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 33-49.
    19. F. G. Badía & M. D. Berrade, 2009. "Optimum Maintenance Policy of a Periodically Inspected System under Imperfect Repair," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2009, pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Peng & Wang, Guanjun, 2022. "Minimal repair models with non-negligible repair time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Mizutani, Satoshi & Zhao, Xufeng & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2021. "Age and periodic replacement policies with two failure modes in general replacement models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Hooti, Fatemeh & Ahmadi, Jafar & Longobardi, Maria, 2020. "Optimal extended warranty length with limited number of repairs in the warranty period," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Lima, Victor Hugo Resende & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Aribisala, Adetoye Ayokunle, 2023. "A delay-time model to integrate the sequence of resumable jobs, inspection policy, and quality for a single-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Wang, Jingjing & Qiu, Qingan & Wang, Huanhuan & Lin, Cong, 2021. "Optimal condition-based preventive maintenance policy for balanced systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Vladimir Rykov & Olga Kochueva & Elvira Zaripova, 2023. "Renewable k -Out-of- n System with the Component-Wise Strategy of Preventive System Maintenance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Carpitella, Silvia & Mzougui, Ilyas & Benítez, Julio & Carpitella, Fortunato & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín & La Cascia, Marco, 2021. "A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Hamdan, K. & Tavangar, M. & Asadi, M., 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance for repairable weighted k-out-of-n systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Safaei, Fatemeh & Ahmadi, Jafar & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2022. "A maintenance policy for a k-out-of-n system under enhancing the system’s operating time and safety constraints, and selling the second-hand components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    3. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2019. "Scheduling of imperfect inspections for reliability critical systems with shock-driven defects and delayed failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 89-98.
    4. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    5. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    7. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2018. "Conditional inspection and maintenance of a system with two interacting components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 533-544.
    8. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan Van Houtum, 2022. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," DEM Discussion Paper Series 22-01, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    10. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Multi-objective design of aircraft maintenance using Gaussian process learning and adaptive sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    11. Peng, Rui & He, Xiaofeng & Zhong, Chao & Kou, Gang & Xiao, Hui, 2022. "Preventive maintenance for heterogeneous parallel systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Scarf, P.A., 2013. "Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-29.
    13. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. KarabaÄŸ, Oktay & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob, 2020. "Integrated optimization of maintenance interventions and spare part selection for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2017. "A preventive maintenance policy based on dependent two-stage deterioration and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 201-211.
    16. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    17. García Nieto, P.J. & García-Gonzalo, E. & Sánchez Lasheras, F. & de Cos Juez, F.J., 2015. "Hybrid PSO–SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 219-231.
    18. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2021. "Optimal Prognostics and Health Management-driven inspection and maintenance strategies for industrial systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:201:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019308786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.