IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i4p873-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RUL management by production reference loopback

Author

Listed:
  • Kamrul Islam Shahin
  • Christophe Simon
  • Philippe Weber

Abstract

Online remaining useful life (RUL) assessment is a significant asset in prognostic and health management (PHM) in many industrial domains where safety, reliability, and cost reduction are of high importance. It is not easy to predict the breakdown state of a system when it operates under multiple operating conditions, because system degradation varies with the dynamics of the operations. This paper presents an Input-Output Hidden Markov Model (IOHMM) that estimates the RUL in real time based on available measurements. The model learns the impact of the operating condition on the RUL and allows to manage the system RUL by changing the corresponding operating conditions. A reference managing algorithm is presented to match the estimated RUL to a given target RUL. In addition, well-known algorithms are adapted from HMM to IOHMM and are used for model training and health state diagnostics. A numerical application is proposed to show the importance of obtaining good predictions from a limited amount of data sequences. Specifically, since degradation is a slow process, it is difficult to have a large amount of data sequences in order to predict the RUL more accurately until the failure. Therefore, the bootstrap method with data resampling and replacement is used to train the IOHMM model to improve estimation accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamrul Islam Shahin & Christophe Simon & Philippe Weber, 2024. "RUL management by production reference loopback," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(4), pages 873-888, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:4:p:873-888
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221128363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221128363
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221128363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Zhen & Li, Yaping & Xia, Tangbin & Pan, Ershun, 2019. "Hidden Markov model with auto-correlated observations for remaining useful life prediction and optimal maintenance policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 123-136.
    2. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    3. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing, 2019. "A hybrid prognostic method for system degradation based on particle filter and relevance vector machine," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 51-63.
    4. Zamalieva, Daniya & Yilmaz, Alper & Aldemir, Tunc, 2013. "Online scenario labeling using a hidden Markov model for assessment of nuclear plant state," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Zhao, S. & Liu, X. & Zhuo, Y., 2017. "Hybrid Hidden Markov Models for resilience metrics in a dynamic infrastructure system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 84-97.
    6. Fort, A. & Mugnaini, M. & Vignoli, V., 2015. "Hidden Markov Models approach used for life parameters estimations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 85-91.
    7. Lee, Jinwoo & Kwon, Daeil & Kim, Namhun & Lee, Changyong, 2019. "PHM-based wiring system damage estimation for near zero downtime in manufacturing facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 213-218.
    8. Rebello, Sinda & Yu, Hongyang & Ma, Lin, 2018. "An integrated approach for system functional reliability assessment using Dynamic Bayesian Network and Hidden Markov Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 124-135.
    9. Hong, H.P. & Zhou, W. & Zhang, S. & Ye, W., 2014. "Optimal condition-based maintenance decisions for systems with dependent stochastic degradation of components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 276-288.
    10. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    11. Ntalampiras, Stavros & Soupionis, Yannis & Giannopoulos, Georgios, 2015. "A fault diagnosis system for interdependent critical infrastructures based on HMMs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 73-81.
    12. Chen, Jinglong & Jing, Hongjie & Chang, Yuanhong & Liu, Qian, 2019. "Gated recurrent unit based recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of nonlinear deterioration process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 372-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Gaige & Chen, Jinglong & Zi, Yanyang & Miao, Huihui, 2017. "Hyper-parameter optimization based nonlinear multistate deterioration modeling for deterioration level assessment and remaining useful life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 517-526.
    2. Zhang, Wenyu & Zhang, Xiaohong & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xing & He, Zhen, 2024. "Optimal condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component repairable systems with economic dependence in a finite-horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Guo, Chunhui & Liang, Zhenglin, 2022. "A predictive Markov decision process for optimizing inspection and maintenance strategies of partially observable multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Wang, Yukun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Junyan & Liu, Yiliu, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    6. KarabaÄŸ, Oktay & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob, 2020. "Integrated optimization of maintenance interventions and spare part selection for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Yaping Li & Enrico Zio & Ershun Pan, 2021. "An MEWMA-based segmental multivariate hidden Markov model for degradation assessment and prediction," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 831-844, October.
    8. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    9. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Tang, Ting & Yuan, Huimei, 2022. "A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2021. "Optimal Prognostics and Health Management-driven inspection and maintenance strategies for industrial systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    14. Prakash, Om & Samantaray, Arun Kumar, 2021. "Prognosis of Dynamical System Components with Varying Degradation Patterns using model–data–fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Liu, Qiannan & Ma, Lin & Wang, Naichao & Chen, Ankang & Jiang, Qihang, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance model considering multiple maintenance effects on the dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Wang, Weikai & Chen, Xian, 2023. "Piecewise deterministic Markov process for condition-based imperfect maintenance models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Xu, Ren-Hong & Lai, Yung-Cheng & Huang, Kwei-Long, 2021. "Decision support models for annual catenary maintenance task identification and assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Dongjin Lee & Rong Pan, 2017. "Predictive maintenance of complex system with multi-level reliability structure," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4785-4801, August.
    19. Lam, Ji Ye Janet & Banjevic, Dragan, 2015. "A myopic policy for optimal inspection scheduling for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Azadeh, A. & Asadzadeh, S.M. & Salehi, N. & Firoozi, M., 2015. "Condition-based maintenance effectiveness for series–parallel power generation system—A combined Markovian simulation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-368.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:4:p:873-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.