IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i3p91-d1698652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fleet Coalitions: A Collaborative Planning Model Balancing Economic and Environmental Costs for Sustainable Multimodal Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Laura Pala

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica, Automatica, e Gestionale “A. Ruberti", Università la Sapienza di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy
    Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica “Antonio Ruberti”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Stecca

    (Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica “Antonio Ruberti”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Sustainability is a critical concern in transportation, notably in light of governmental initiatives such as cap-and-trade systems and eco-label regulations aimed at reducing emissions. In this context, collaborative approaches among carriers, which involve the exchange of shipment requests, are increasingly recognized as effective strategies to enhance efficiency and reduce environmental impact. Methods: This research proposes a novel collaborative planning model for multimodal transport designed to minimize the total costs associated with freight movements, including both transportation and C O 2 emissions costs. Transshipments of freight between vehicles are modeled in the proposed formulation, promoting carrier coalitions. This study incorporated eco-labels, representing different emission ranges, to capture shipper sustainability preferences and integrated authority-imposed low-emission zones as constraints. A bi-objective approach was adopted, combining transportation and emission costs through a weighted sum method. Results: A case study on the Naples Bypass network (Italy) is presented, highlighting the model’s applicability in a real-world setting and demonstrating the effectiveness of collaborative transport planning. In addition, the model quantified the benefits of collaboration under low-emission zone (LEZ) constraints, showing notable reductions in both total costs and emissions. Conclusions: Overall, the proposed approach offers a valuable decision support tool for both carriers and policymakers, enabling sustainable freight transportation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Laura Pala & Giuseppe Stecca, 2025. "Fleet Coalitions: A Collaborative Planning Model Balancing Economic and Environmental Costs for Sustainable Multimodal Transport," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:91-:d:1698652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/91/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/91/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Okan Örsan Özener & Özlem Ergun & Martin Savelsbergh, 2011. "Lane-Exchange Mechanisms for Truckload Carrier Collaboration," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Demailly, Damien & Quirion, Philippe, 2008. "European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 2009-2027, July.
    5. Schneeweiss, Christoph, 2003. "Distributed decision making--a unified approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 237-252, October.
    6. Cruijssen, Frans & Cools, Martine & Dullaert, Wout, 2007. "Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 129-142, March.
    7. Cruijssen, Frans & Cools, Martine & Dullaert, W., 2007. "Horizontal cooperation in logistics: opportunities and impediments," Other publications TiSEM ab29fad8-1faf-422b-826e-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Rais, A. & Alvelos, F. & Carvalho, M.S., 2014. "New mixed integer-programming model for the pickup-and-delivery problem with transshipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 530-539.
    9. Gadema, Zaina & Oglethorpe, David, 2011. "The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: A policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 815-822.
    10. Veronika Fensterer & Helmut Küchenhoff & Verena Maier & Heinz-Erich Wichmann & Susanne Breitner & Annette Peters & Jianwei Gu & Josef Cyrys, 2014. "Evaluation of the Impact of Low Emission Zone and Heavy Traffic Ban in Munich (Germany) on the Reduction of PM 10 in Ambient Air," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oana Dinu & Eugen Rosca & Stefan Burciu & Cristina Oprea & Anamaria Ilie & Armand Serban Stere & Florin Rusca, 2024. "Integrative Framework for Platform-Based Business Models to Drive Climate Neutrality in Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Arroyo, Federico, 2024. "Cost Allocation in Vehicle Routing Problems with Time Windows," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(1), pages 1241-1268.
    4. Grigoriev, Alexander & Jung, Verena & Peeters - Rutten, Marianne & Vredeveld, Tjark, 2017. "On the Acceptance of Gain Sharing Methods in Supply Chain Collaboration," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    5. Arslan, Okan & Archetti, Claudia & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert & Grazia Speranza, Maria, 2020. "Minimum cost network design in strategic alliances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2021. "The collaborative consistent vehicle routing problem with workload balance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 955-965.
    7. E. Angelelli & V. Morandi & M. G. Speranza, 2024. "Multi-day fair collaboration in demand-responsive transportation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(2), pages 209-239, June.
    8. Ecem Saygın & Salih Tekin & Gültekin Kuyzu, 2025. "Fair cost allocation for collaborative hub networks," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-43, June.
    9. Scherr, Yannick Oskar & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2024. "Request acceptance with overbooking in dynamic and collaborative vehicle routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 612-629.
    10. Elting, Steffen & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2025. "Preference learning for efficient bundle selection in horizontal transport collaborations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 953-968.
    11. Osicka, Ondrej & Guajardo, Mario & van Oost, Thibault, 2018. "Cooperative game-theoretic features of cost sharing in location-routing," Discussion Papers 2018/11, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    12. Hacardiaux, Thomas & Defryn, Christof & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Verdonck, Lotte, 2020. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    13. Fang, Jiawen & He, Canfei & Zhu, Shengjun, 2024. "From death to birth: Do logistics parks help local renewals in logistics industry?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 148-158.
    14. Amina Antit & Amel Jaoua & Safa Bhar Layeb & Chefi Triki, 2025. "Pre-auction optimization for the selection of shared customers in the last-mile delivery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 344(2), pages 989-1026, January.
    15. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    16. Thomas Hacardiaux & Christof Defryn & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez & Lotte Verdonck, 2022. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 121-153, March.
    17. Frank Karsten & Marco Slikker & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2015. "Resource Pooling and Cost Allocation Among Independent Service Providers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 476-488, April.
    18. Mirjam Groote Schaarsberg & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Hans Reijnierse, 2013. "Game theoretic analysis of maximum cooperative purchasing situations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(8), pages 607-624, December.
    19. Vanovermeire, Christine & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2014. "Integration of the cost allocation in the optimization of collaborative bundling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 125-143.
    20. Santos, Maria João & Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Carvalho, Margarida & Marques, Alexandra, 2021. "A bilevel approach for the collaborative transportation planning problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:91-:d:1698652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.