IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v6y2017i3p9-d104946.html

Drawing the Line: Disability, Genetic Intervention and Bioethics

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Conti

    (Graduate student, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, 185 Pelham St., Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia)

Abstract

Meteoric scientific advances in genetic technologies with the potential for human gene editing intervention pose tremendous legal, medical, social, ethical and moral issues for society as a whole. Persons with disabilities in particular have a significant stake in determining how these technologies are governed at the international, domestic and individual levels in the future. However, the law cannot easily keep up with the rate of scientific progression. This paper aims to posit a methodology of reform, based on a core value of human dignity, as the optimal course of action to ensure that the interests of persons with disabilities, other possibly marginalised groups, and the scientific community, are balanced fairly. The paper critically analyses the current law and varying bioethical perspectives to ultimately conclude that a clear principled approach toward open discussion and consensus is of paramount importance to have any chance of devising an effective regulatory regime over human gene editing technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Conti, 2017. "Drawing the Line: Disability, Genetic Intervention and Bioethics," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:9-:d:104946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/3/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/3/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Debra J. H. Mathews & Sarah Chan & Peter J. Donovan & Thomas Douglas & Christopher Gyngell & John Harris & Alan Regenberg & Robin Lovell-Badge, 2015. "CRISPR: A path through the thicket," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7577), pages 159-161, November.
    2. Black, Julia, 2002. "Critical reflections on regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35985, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Tom Shakespeare, 2015. "Gene editing: Heed disability views," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7579), pages 446-446, November.
    4. Gregor Wolbring, 2015. "Gene editing: Govern ability expectations," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7579), pages 446-446, November.
    5. Heidi Ledford, 2015. "CRISPR, the disruptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 522(7554), pages 20-24, June.
    6. Gregor Wolbring & Lucy Diep, 2016. "The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esther Salmerón-Manzano, 2021. "Legaltech and Lawtech: Global Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Coverage of Allies, Allyship and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-38, November.
    2. Ian Loader & Adam White, 2017. "How can we better align private security with the public interest? Towards a civilizing model of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 166-184, June.
    3. Gowthorp, Lisa & Greenhow, Annette & O’Brien, Danny, 2016. "An interdisciplinary approach in identifying the legitimate regulator of anti-doping in sport: The case of the Australian Football League," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 48-60.
    4. Oleh Pasko, 2018. "Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 37-46, June.
    5. Justo-Hanani, Ronit & Dayan, Tamar, 2014. "The role of the state in regulatory policy for nanomaterials risk: Analyzing the expansion of state-centric rulemaking in EU and US chemicals policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 169-178.
    6. Minogue, Martin, 2005. "Apples and Oranges: Problems in the Analysis of Comparative Regulatory Governance," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30589, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    7. Silvana Signori & Helen Alford, 2025. "Can Shareholder Activism be aVirtuous Practice?," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 479-501, December.
    8. Bärbel R. Dorbeck‐Jung & Mirjan J. Oude Vrielink & Jordy F. Gosselt & Joris J. Van Hoof & Menno D. T. De Jong, 2010. "Contested hybridization of regulation: Failure of the Dutch regulatory system to protect minors from harmful media," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 154-174, June.
    9. Michiel A. Heldeweg, 2017. "Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-34, July.
    10. Tanita Northcott & Mark Lawrence & Christine Parker & Phillip Baker, 2023. "Ecological regulation for healthy and sustainable food systems: responding to the global rise of ultra-processed foods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1333-1358, September.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Cheng, Kuo-Tai, 2013. "Governance mechanisms and regulation in the utilities: An investigation in a Taiwan sample," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 17-22.
    13. Rahul Kapoor & Thomas Klueter, 2021. "Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-74, March.
    14. Gregor Wolbring & Lucy Diep, 2016. "The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    15. John Braithwaite & Cary Coglianese & David Levi‐Faur, 2007. "Can regulation and governance make a difference?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, March.
    16. Alexandra Hessling & Hanno Pahl, 2006. "The Global System of Finance," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 189-218, January.
    17. Minogue, Martin, 2008. "What connects regulatory governance to poverty?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-201, May.
    18. Suparna Karmakar, 2010. "GATS : Domestic Regulations versus Market Access," Working Papers id:2903, eSocialSciences.
    19. Xuehua Zhang, 2016. "Judicial enforcement deputies: Causes and effects of Chinese judges enforcing environmental administrative decisions," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 29-43, March.
    20. Matthew Bacon & Toby Seddon, 2020. "Controlling Drug Users: Forms of Power and Behavioural Regulation in Drug Treatment Services," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 60(2), pages 403-421.
    21. Kumar, Shashwat, 2020. "Diffusion agents and institutional change: The variable influence of independent regulatory agencies across sectors in India," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:9-:d:104946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.