IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1412-d1695032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating Land Use and Evaluating Spatial Patterns in Wuhan Under Multiple Climate Scenarios: An Integrated SD-PLUS-FD Modeling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Yuan

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xinyu Li

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Meichen Ding

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Guoqiang Shen

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Mengyuan Xu

    (College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

Abstract

Amid intensifying global climate anomalies and accelerating urban expansion, land use systems have become increasingly dynamic, complex, and uncertain. Accurately predicting and scientifically evaluating the evolution of land use patterns is essential to advancing territorial spatial governance and achieving ecological security goals. However, most existing land use models emphasize quantity forecasting and spatial allocation, while overlooking the third critical dimension—structural complexity, which is essential for understanding the nonlinear, fragmented evolution of urban systems, thus limiting their ability to fully capture the evolutionary characteristics of urban land systems. To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated SD-PLUS-FD model, which combines System Dynamics, Patch-based Land Use Simulation, and Fractal Dimension analysis to construct a comprehensive three-dimensional framework for simulating and evaluating land use patterns in terms of quantity, spatial distribution, and structural complexity. Wuhan is selected as the case study area, with simulations conducted under three IPCC-aligned climate scenarios—SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5—to project land use changes by 2030. The SD model demonstrates robust predictive performance, with an overall error of less than ±5%, while the PLUS model achieves high spatial accuracy (average Kappa >0.7996; average overall accuracy >0.8856). Fractal dimension analysis further reveals that since 2000, the spatial boundary complexity of all land use types—except forest land—has generally shown an upward trend across multiple scenarios, highlighting the increasingly nonlinear and fragmented nature of urban expansion. The FD values for construction land and cultivated land declined to their historical low in 2005, then gradually increased, reaching their peak under the SSP1-2.6 scenario. Notably, the increase in FD for construction land was significantly greater than that for cultivated land, indicating a stronger dynamic response in spatial structural evolution. In contrast, forest land exhibited pronounced scenario-dependent variations in FD. Its structural complexity remained generally stable under all scenarios except SSP5-8.5, reflecting higher structural resilience and boundary adaptability under diverse socioclimatic conditions. The SD-PLUS-FD model effectively reveals how land systems respond to different socioclimatic drivers in both spatial and structural dimensions. This three-dimensional framework reveals how land systems respond to socioclimatic drivers across temporal, spatial, and structural scales, offering strategic insights for climate-resilient planning and optimized land resource management in rapidly urbanizing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Yuan & Xinyu Li & Meichen Ding & Guoqiang Shen & Mengyuan Xu, 2025. "Simulating Land Use and Evaluating Spatial Patterns in Wuhan Under Multiple Climate Scenarios: An Integrated SD-PLUS-FD Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1412-:d:1695032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aboubakar Gasirabo & Chen Xi & Baligira R. Hamad & Umwali Dufatanye Edovia, 2023. "A CA–Markov-Based Simulation and Prediction of LULC Changes over the Nyabarongo River Basin, Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Bharathi, Naveen & Malghan, Deepak & Mishra, Sumit & Rahman, Andaleeb, 2021. "Fractal urbanism: City size and residential segregation in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Qinglong Ding & Yang Chen & Lingtong Bu & Yanmei Ye, 2021. "Multi-Scenario Analysis of Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Delta by Coupling FLUS with InVEST Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Ines Winz & Gary Brierley & Sam Trowsdale, 2009. "The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(7), pages 1301-1323, May.
    5. Lucien Benguigui & Daniel Czamanski & Maria Marinov & Yuval Portugali, 2000. "When and Where is a City Fractal?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(4), pages 507-519, August.
    6. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Chen, Yanguang & Feng, Jian, 2017. "Spatial analysis of cities using Renyi entropy and fractal parameters," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 279-287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saeedimoghaddam, Mahmoud & Stepinski, T.F. & Dmowska, Anna, 2020. "Rényi’s spectra of urban form for different modalities of input data," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Xiaoyu Zhu & Zhongjun Wang & Tianci Gu & Yujun Zhang, 2024. "Multi–Scenario Prediction of Land Cover Changes and Habitat Quality Based on the FLUS–InVEST Model in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Wenbo, Xu & Hengzhou, Xu & Xiaoyan, Li & Hua, Qiu & Ziyao, Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem services response to future land use/cover change (LUCC) under multiple scenarios: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Liang Liu & Cong Feng & Hongwei Zhang & Xuehua Zhang, 2015. "Game Analysis and Simulation of the River Basin Sustainable Development Strategy Integrating Water Emission Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Abduraupov, Rustam & Akhmadjanova, Gulmira & Ibragimov, Abdulla & Bala, B.K. & Sidique, Shaufique F. & Makhmudov, Miraziz & Angelina, Kim, 2022. "Modeling of water management for cotton production in Uzbekistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Jesus R. Gastelum & Ganesh Krishnamurthy & Nemesciano Ochoa & Shane Sibbett & Margie Armstrong & Parag Kalaria, 2018. "The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2247-2260, May.
    8. Xiji Jiang & Jiaxin Sun & Tianzi Zhang & Qian Li & Yan Ma & Wen Qu & Dan Ye & Zhendong Lei, 2025. "Defining Rural Types Nearby Large Cities from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Integration: A Case Study of Xi’an Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Assem Abu Hatab & Padmaja Ravula & Swamikannu Nedumaran & Carl-Johan Lagerkvist, 2022. "Perceptions of the impacts of urban sprawl among urban and peri-urban dwellers of Hyderabad, India: a Latent class clustering analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12787-12812, November.
    10. Zhiwei Deng & Bin Quan, 2022. "Intensity Characteristics and Multi-Scenario Projection of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Hengyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Wei Huang & Shuhui Gao & Peiqi Hu & Yue Han & Shiyu Ding, 2024. "Is the coupling and coordination of economic, social and environmental development crucial to the governance of relative poverty?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-29, August.
    12. Dike Zhang & Jianpeng Wang & Ying Wang & Lei Xu & Liang Zheng & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi & Hui Yang, 2022. "Is There a Spatial Relationship between Urban Landscape Pattern and Habitat Quality? Implication for Landscape Planning of the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Angela Dikou, 2024. "Competence in Unsustainability Resolution—A New Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Patricia Chica-Morales & Victor F. Muñoz & Antonio J. Domenech, 2021. "System Dynamics as Ex Ante Impact Assessment Tool in International Development Cooperation: Study Case of Urban Sustainability Policies in Darkhan, Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Xian’En Wang & Wei Zhan & Shuo Wang, 2020. "Uncertain Water Environment Carrying Capacity Simulation Based on the Monte Carlo Method–System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Fushun City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Wang Xiao-jun & Zhang Jian-yun & Wang Jian-hua & He Rui-min & Amgad ElMahdi & Liu Jin-hua & Wang Xin-gong & David King & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2014. "Climate change and water resources management in Tuwei river basin of Northwest China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 107-120, January.
    17. Guangyang Wu & Lanhai Li & Sajjad Ahmad & Xi Chen & Xiangliang Pan, 2013. "A Dynamic Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Regional Water Resources in Arid Areas: A Case Study of Bayingolin, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3085-3101, June.
    18. Yanguang Chen & Yixing Zhou, 2006. "Reinterpreting Central Place Networks Using Ideas from Fractals and Self-Organized Criticality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(3), pages 345-364, June.
    19. Yanguang Chen & Yixing Zhou, 2003. "The Rank-Size Rule and Fractal Hierarchies of Cities: Mathematical Models and Empirical Analyses," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(6), pages 799-818, December.
    20. Ming Zhang & Xiaojie Liu & Dan Yan, 2023. "Land Use Conflicts Assessment in Xiamen, China under Multiple Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1412-:d:1695032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.