IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1278-d1679210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sparing or Sharing? Differential Management of Cultivated Land Based on the “Landscape Differentiation–Function Matching” Analytical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Guanyu Ding

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huafu Zhao

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

Abstract

The sole function of cultivated land of agricultural production is insufficient to meet the diverse demands of modern agriculture. To address land-use conflicts and achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of zero hunger and reduced carbon emissions by 2030, this study introduces the theory of land sparing and sharing, uses landscape indices to identify spatially fragmented areas, employs a four-quadrant model to assess the matching status of functional supply and demand, and applies correlation analysis to determine the trade-off/synergy relationships between functions. The results indicate the following: (1) Zhengzhou’s farmland landscape exhibits characteristics of low density, low continuity, and high aggregation, with separation zones and sharing zones accounting for 77% and 23% of the total farmland area, respectively. (2) The multifunctional supply (high in the northeast, low in the southwest) and demand (high in the west, low in the east) of farmland show significant mismatches, with PF and EF exhibiting the most pronounced supply–demand mismatches. The “LS-LD and HS-LD” types of farmland account for the largest proportions, at 39% and 35%, respectively. (3) The study area is divided into four primary types: “PCZ, RLZ, BDZ, and MAZ” to optimize supply–demand relationships and utilization patterns. This study enriches the application of land sparing and sharing in related fields, providing important references for policymakers in optimizing land-use allocation and balancing food and ecological security.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanyu Ding & Huafu Zhao, 2025. "Sparing or Sharing? Differential Management of Cultivated Land Based on the “Landscape Differentiation–Function Matching” Analytical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1278-:d:1679210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1278-:d:1679210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.