IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i2p303-d751000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Improvement of Cultivated Land Leisure Service Function Based on Multisource Spatial Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yiming Yang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Xiuli Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Jian Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Yiwei Geng

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Weiqiang Chen

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Qun Wu

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Xiaoke Guan

    (Social Development Research Center, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

The leisure service function is an important component of the derivative function and non-market function of cultivated land. Therefore, exploring the strength of the cultivated land leisure service function with the help of spatial information technology is significant in guiding the proper utilization and protection of cultivated land resources. This paper constructed an evaluation system based on the three dimensions of ecological landscape, social activities, and economic performance, explored the spatial difference of the cultivated land leisure service function in Yuanyang County, the major grain-producing area along the Yellow River through spatial weighted overlay, classified the hot spots of leisure services and presented suggestions for improvement. Results show the following: (1) the landscape resources in the northern part are relatively monotonous, while those in the southern part are rich and evenly distributed. Spatial accessibility presents a distribution of “one core with multiple subcores”. The distribution of leisure service supply capacity is characterized by “multiple cores and multiple circles.” (2) The hot spots of the cultivated land leisure service function are the Urban Agricultural Central Area and the Ecological Agriculture Core Area in the middle of the county, and the Suburban Agritourism Development Area, the Yellow River Agritourism Transitional Area, and the Leisure Agriculture Connection Area on the periphery of the county. (3) The agricultural landscape should be fully protected and utilized in the Urban Agricultural Central Area. The spatial accessibility and regional reputation of the Ecological Agriculture Core Area need to be improved. The landscape diversity and landscape quality should be improved in the Suburban Agritourism Development Area. The Yellow River Agritourism Transitional Area needs to overcome the loss of tourists. The Leisure Agriculture Connection Area should increase the number of leisure and tourism facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiming Yang & Xiuli Wang & Jian Wang & Yiwei Geng & Weiqiang Chen & Qun Wu & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Evaluation and Improvement of Cultivated Land Leisure Service Function Based on Multisource Spatial Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:303-:d:751000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Zhu & Zhang, Anlu & Zhou, Kehao & Huang, Lingxiang, 2021. "Can payment tools substitute for regulatory ones? Estimating the policy preference for agricultural land preservation, Tianjin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Ayala Wineman & Thomas S Jayne, 2018. "Land Prices Heading Skyward? An Analysis of Farmland Values across Tanzania," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 187-214.
    3. Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Liejia Huang & Hongjie Du, 2019. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Multifunctional Cultivated Land Protection Linking Supply to Demand in Value Engineering Theory: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. A Fleischer & Y Tsur, 2000. "Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 27(3), pages 385-398, September.
    5. Chin-Huang Huang & Chiung-Hsia Wang, 2015. "Estimating the Total Economic Value of Cultivated Flower Land in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Chin†Huang Huang, 2017. "Estimating the environmental effects and recreational benefits of cultivated flower land for environmental quality improvement in Taiwan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(1), pages 29-39, January.
    7. Alison J. Eagle & David E. Eagle & Tracy E. Stobbe & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2015. "Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban-Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 282-298.
    8. Shan He & Lin Lin & Qian Xu & Chenxia Hu & Mengmeng Zhou & Jinhua Liu & Yongjun Li & Ke Wang, 2021. "Farmland Zoning Integrating Agricultural Multi-Functional Supply, Demand and Relationships: A Case Study of the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    9. You, Heyuan & Hu, Xiaowei & Wu, Yizhou, 2018. "Farmland use intensity changes in response to rural transition in Zhejiang province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 350-361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chengxiu Li & Xiuli Wang & Zhengxin Ji & Ling Li & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Optimizing the Use of Cultivated Land in China’s Main Grain-Producing Areas from the Dual Perspective of Ecological Security and Leading-Function Zoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baoshu Wu & Meifang Liu & Yufei Wan & Zhenjiang Song, 2023. "Evolution and Coordination of Cultivated Land Multifunctionality in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Chun-Chu Yeh & Cheng-Shen Lin & Chin-Huang Huang, 2018. "The Total Economic Value of Sport Tourism in Belt and Road Development—An Environmental Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Wei Wang & Xin Luo & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "Can Land Transfer Alleviate the Poverty of the Elderly? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Martina Agosta & Emanuele Schimmenti & Caterina Patrizia Di Franco & Antonio Asciuto, 2025. "Agricultural Land Markets: A Systematic Literature Review on the Factors Affecting Land Prices," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Xindong Wei & Ning Wang & Pingping Luo & Jie Yang & Jian Zhang & Kangli Lin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Land Marketization and Its Driving Forces for Sustainable Urban–Rural Development in Shaanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Anat Tchetchik & Aliza Fleischer & Israel Finkelshtain, 2011. "Agglomeration and Club Goods in the Rural Accommodations Industry," ERSA conference papers ersa10p359, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Lai, Zhaohao & Chen, Meiqiu & Liu, Taoju, 2020. "Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Idda, Lorenzo & Madau, Fabio A. & Orru, Elia & Pulina, Pietro & Sini, Maria Paola, 2005. "Efficacy of European Policies on Rural Landscape: the Case Study of Sardinia (ITALY)," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24778, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Axelrad, Gilad & Feinerman, Eli, 2007. "Regional Planning Of Wastewater Reuse For Irrigation And River Rehabilitation," Discussion Papers 7141, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    12. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Berhane, Guush, 2021. "Are land rental markets responding to rising population pressures and land scarcity in sub-Saharan Africa?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Wineman, Ayala & Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda, 2017. "Land markets and the distribution of land in northwestern Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 550-563.
    15. Bockarjova, Marija & Botzen, Wouter J.W. & Koetse, Mark J., 2020. "Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Bar-Nahum, Ziv & Reznik, Ami & Finkelshtain, Israel & Kan, Iddo, 2022. "Centralized water management under lobbying: Economic analysis of desalination in Israel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Tuan, Tran Hu & Lindhjem, Henrik, 2008. "Meta-analysis of nature conservation values in Asia & Oceania: Data heterogeneity and benefit transfer issues," MPRA Paper 11470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Fleischer, Aliza & Tchetchik, Anat, 2002. "Is agriculture an important componenet of rural tourism?," ERSA conference papers ersa02p065, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Baoqi Liu & Lishan Xu & Yulin Long & Yuehua Wei & Changlin Ao, 2024. "Public Willingness to Pay for Farmland Eco-Compensation and Allocation to Farmers: An Empirical Study from Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Gilad Axelrad & Eli Feinerman, 2009. "Regional Planning of Wastewater Reuse for Irrigation and River Rehabilitation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 105-131, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:303-:d:751000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.