IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p927-d841128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Land-Use Changes and Conflicts between Cropland and Forest in the Mekong River Basin during 1990–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahao Zhai

    (School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Chiwei Xiao

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Zhiming Feng

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 101149, China)

  • Ying Liu

    (School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

Abstract

The Mekong River Basin (MRB) has experienced drastic and extensive land-use and land-cover changes (LULCCs) since the 1990s, including the conflicts between cropland and forest, yet remain quantitatively uninvestigated. With three decades (1990–2020) of land-use products, here we reveal the characteristics of LULCCs and the conflicts between cropland and forest in the MRB and its three sub-basins, i.e., upstream area (UA), midstream area (MA), and downstream area (DA). The four main results are as follows: (1) Since 1990, the dominated features are forest loss and cropland expansion in the MRB and show obvious sub-basin differences. (2) The LULCC was most active before 2000, with a comprehensive dynamic degree of almost 2%. Among them, construction land has the highest single dynamic degree (5%), especially in the DA, reaching 12%. (3) The key features of land-use transfer are the interconversions of forest and cropland, as well as cropland converted into construction land. About 18% (63,940 km 2 ) of forest was reclaimed as cropland, and 17% (45,967 km 2 ) of cropland was returned to forest in the past 31 years. (4) The conflict between cropland and forest was the most dominant LULCC, accounting for 86% of the MRB area. Overall, cropland expansion and forest loss (CEFL) were more dominant in the DA, while cropland fallow and forest restoration (CFFR) had an advantage in the MA. Indeed, CEFL was mainly seen in the plains below a 200 m elevation level, while CFFR tended to occur in the highlands. Our basin-scale study can enrich the existing pan-regional results of LULCCs, and facilitates the understanding of the dynamics and related mechanisms of CFER and CFFR in the tropics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahao Zhai & Chiwei Xiao & Zhiming Feng & Ying Liu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Land-Use Changes and Conflicts between Cropland and Forest in the Mekong River Basin during 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:927-:d:841128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tran, Hanh & Nguyen, Quoc & Kervyn, Matthieu, 2018. "Factors influencing people’s knowledge, attitude, and practice in land use dynamics: A case study in Ca Mau province in the Mekong delta, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 227-238.
    2. Jun Wang & Lichun Sui & Xiaomei Yang & Zhihua Wang & Dazhuan Ge & Junmei Kang & Fengshuo Yang & Yueming Liu & Bin Liu, 2019. "Economic Globalization Impacts on the Ecological Environment of Inland Developing Countries: A Case Study of Laos from the Perspective of the Land Use/Cover Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Siqin Tong & Gang Bao & Ah Rong & Xiaojun Huang & Yongbin Bao & Yuhai Bao, 2020. "Comparison of the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Changes in Four Municipalities of China Based on Intensity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Bo Liu & Libo Pan & Yue Qi & Xiao Guan & Junsheng Li, 2021. "Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Yellow River Basin from 1980 to 2015 and Its Impact on the Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Li Wu & Binggeng Xie & Xiao Xiao & Bing Xue & Jingzhong Li, 2020. "Classification Method and Determination of Mountainous Area Types at Township Scales: A Case Study of Yuxi City, Yunnan Province," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-13, September.
    6. Fangyu Zheng & Jiuming Huang & Zhiming Feng & Chiwei Xiao, 2021. "Impact of the Kunming–Bangkok Highway on Land Use Changes along the Route between Laos and Thailand," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Ge Li & Juanle Wang & Yanjie Wang & Haishuo Wei & Altansukh Ochir & Davaadorj Davaasuren & Sonomdagva Chonokhuu & Elbegjargal Nasanbat, 2019. "Spatial and Temporal Variations in Grassland Production from 2006 to 2015 in Mongolia Along the China–Mongolia Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Rong Zhao & Tianyu Jia & He Li, 2023. "Could the Sloping Land Conversion Program Promote Farmers’ Income in Rocky Desertification Areas?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Xu & Yuqi Miao & Shuaimeng Zhu & Jimin Cheng & Jingwei Jin, 2023. "Modelling the Geographical Distribution Pattern of Apple Trees on the Loess Plateau, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Xiaotong Wang & Jiazheng Han & Jian Lin, 2022. "Response of Land Use and Net Primary Productivity to Coal Mining: A Case Study of Huainan City and Its Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Junmei Kang & Xiaomei Yang & Zhihua Wang & Hongbin Cheng & Jun Wang & Hongtao Tang & Yan Li & Zongpan Bian & Zhuoli Bai, 2022. "Comparison of Three Ten Meter Land Cover Products in a Drought Region: A Case Study in Northwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Xiaohong Li & Jiuhong Zhang & Jinxia Huang & Wenhao Lin & Shengjun Wu & Maohua Ma, 2022. "To Preserve Green Buffer under Polarization and Diffusion Effects of a Fast-Developing Megalopolis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Francis Oremo & Richard Mulwa & Nicholas Oguge, 2021. "Sustainable water access and willingness of smallholder irrigators to pay for on-farm water storage systems in Tsavo sub-catchment, Kenya," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1371-1391, February.
    7. Yang Wang & Remina Shataer & Tingting Xia & Xueer Chang & Hui Zhen & Zhi Li, 2021. "Evaluation on the Change Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Function in the Northern Xinjiang Based on Land Use Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Fengqiang Wu & Caijian Mo & Xiaojun Dai, 2022. "Analysis of the Driving Force of Land Use Change Based on Geographic Detection and Simulation of Future Land Use Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Dadirai Matarira & Onisimo Mutanga & Maheshvari Naidu & Terence Darlington Mushore & Marco Vizzari, 2023. "Characterizing Informal Settlement Dynamics Using Google Earth Engine and Intensity Analysis in Durban Metropolitan Area, South Africa: Linking Pattern to Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Hongpeng Guo & Wenkai Zhao & Chulin Pan & Guijie Qiu & Shuang Xu & Shun Liu, 2022. "Study on the Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Adoption of Conservation Tillage Technology in Black Soil Region in China: A Logistic-ISM Model Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Ran, Rong & Hua, Lei & Xiao, Junfu & Ma, Li & Pang, Mingyue & Ni, Zhengxing, 2023. "Can poverty alleviation policy enhance ecosystem service value? Evidence from poverty-stricken regions in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1509-1525.
    12. Tewodaj Mogues & Valerie Mueller & Florence Kondylis, 2019. "Cost-effectiveness of community-based gendered advisory services to farmers: Analysis in Mozambique and Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, March.
    13. Lijie Huang & Hongqi Wu & Mingjie Shi & Jingjing Tian & Kai Zheng & Tong Dong & Shanshan Wang & Yunhao Li & Yuwei Li, 2025. "Characteristics of Changes in Land Use Intensity in Xinjiang Under Different Future Climate Change Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Thuy Ngan Le & Arnold K. Bregt & Gerardo E. van Halsema & Petra J. G. J. Hellegers & Thi Thu Trang Ngo, 2023. "Multi-Scale Drivers of Land-Use Changes at Farm Level I: Conceptual Framework and Application in the Highly Flooded Zone of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, June.
    15. Habitamu Alesew Ayele & Alemu O. Aga & Liuelsegad Belayneh & Tilahun Wankie Wanjala, 2023. "Hydrological Responses to Land Use/Land Cover Changes in Koga Watershed, Upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Hualin Xie & Yanwei Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Tiangui Lv, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-37, January.
    17. Quan H. Nguyen & Dung D. Tran & Khoi K. Dang & Dorien Korbee & Luan D. M. H. Pham & Lan T. Vu & Tang T. Luu & Loc H. Ho & Phat T. Nguyen & Trang T. T. Ngo & Dung T. K. Nguyen & Andrew Wyatt & Maaike v, 2020. "Land‐use dynamics in the Mekong delta: From national policy to livelihood sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 448-467, May.
    18. Shuping Fan & Peng Li & Qi He & Jiaru Cheng & Mingfeng Zhang & Nan Wu & Song Yang & Shidong Pan, 2022. "Study on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Land Use Ecosystem Service Value and Its Zoning Management and Control in the Typical Alpine Valley Area of Southeast Tibet—Empirical Analysis Based on Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Li Wu & Yanjun Yang & Hailan Yang & Binggeng Xie & Weiqun Luo, 2023. "A Comparative Study on Land Use/Land Cover Change and Topographic Gradient Effect between Mountains and Flatlands of Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Aike Kan & Qing Xiang & Xiao Yang & Huiseng Xu & Xiaoxiang Yu & Hong Huang, 2023. "Revealing the Environmental Characteristics of Towns in the Middle Himalayas Using a Geographic Information System and Self-Organizing Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:927-:d:841128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.