IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1122-d1660992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Forest Management and REDD+: Pathways to Effective Implementation, Livelihood Improvement, and Climate Change Adaptation in Cambodia

Author

Listed:
  • Chaly Y

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4414, New Zealand)

  • Karen F. Hytten

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4414, New Zealand)

  • Diane Pearson

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4414, New Zealand)

Abstract

Community Forest Management (CFM) and REDD+ projects have emerged as key strategies for promoting environmental conservation and livelihood improvement. This review explores the effectiveness of incorporating free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), safeguard principles, grievance redress mechanisms, and benefit-sharing mechanisms into CFM and REDD+ in Cambodia, with a focus on enhancing communities’ livelihoods and climate change adaptation. This paper synthesizes findings from recent literature on CFM and REDD+ in Cambodia and internationally, analyzing key case studies, policy frameworks, and community engagement strategies. Findings suggest that while REDD+ projects offer potential economic and ecological benefits, challenges related to land tenure, equity in benefit-sharing, and community participation remain. This review highlights the need for stronger community engagement, a robust conflict management structure, clear land tenure policies, equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms, and more climate change adaptation activities to ensure the success of CFM and REDD+ projects in Cambodia and the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaly Y & Karen F. Hytten & Diane Pearson, 2025. "Community Forest Management and REDD+: Pathways to Effective Implementation, Livelihood Improvement, and Climate Change Adaptation in Cambodia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1122-:d:1660992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Persson, Joel & Prowse, Martin, 2017. "Collective action on forest governance: An institutional analysis of the Cambodian community forest system," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-79.
    2. Andersson, Krister P. & Smith, Steven M. & Alston, Lee J. & Duchelle, Amy E. & Mwangi, Esther & Larson, Anne M. & de Sassi, Claudio & Sills, Erin O. & Sunderlin, William D. & Wong, Grace Y., 2018. "Wealth and the distribution of benefits from tropical forests: Implications for REDD+," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    3. Sarah Milne & Bill Adams, 2012. "Market Masquerades: Uncovering the Politics of Community-level Payments for Environmental Services in Cambodia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 133-158, January.
    4. Pasgaard, M. & Sun, Z. & Müller, D. & Mertz, O., 2016. "Challenges and opportunities for REDD+: A reality check from perspectives of effectiveness, efficiency and equity," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 161-169.
    5. Aklilu Bekele Chorito & Engdawork Assefa, 2024. "Actors participation and power relations of REDD+ implementation in Bale Eco Region, Ethiopia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1065-1079, September.
    6. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Rana, Eak & Subedi, Bhishma Prasad & Laudari, Hari Krishna & Ghimire, Puspa Lal & Khanal, Sudarshan Chandra & Zhang, Han & Timilsina, Ramesh, 2024. "Carbon emission reduction initiatives: Lessons from the REDD+ process of the Asia and Pacific region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Sereyrotha Ken & Nophea Sasaki & Tomoe Entani & Hwan Ok Ma & Phalla Thuch & Takuji W. Tsusaka, 2020. "Assessment of the Local Perceptions on the Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Agents of Drivers, and Appropriate Activities in Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    8. Duchelle, Amy E. & Cromberg, Marina & Gebara, Maria Fernanda & Guerra, Raissa & Melo, Tadeu & Larson, Anne & Cronkleton, Peter & Börner, Jan & Sills, Erin & Wunder, Sven & Bauch, Simone & May, Peter &, 2014. "Linking Forest Tenure Reform, Environmental Compliance, and Incentives: Lessons from REDD+ Initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 53-67.
    9. Shah, Shipra & Race, Digby, 2024. "Greening the blue Pacific: Lessons on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Nantongo, Mary & Vatn, Arild & Soka, Geofrey, 2024. "REDD+: The perfect marriage between conservation and development? A comparative study of the impacts of REDD+ on livelihoods and deforestation in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Ram Avtar & Haruo Sawada & Pankaj Kumar, 2013. "Role of remote sensing and community forestry to manage forests for the effective implementation of REDD+ mechanism: a case study on Cambodia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1593-1603, December.
    12. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Harry W. Fischer & Ashwini Chhatre & Apurva Duddu & Nabin Pradhan & Arun Agrawal, 2023. "Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(12), pages 1340-1347, December.
    14. Arts, Bas & de Koning, Jessica, 2017. "Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 315-325.
    15. Soukphavanh Sawathvong & Kimihiko Hyakumura & Taiji Fujisaki, 2024. "Stakeholder Participation in REDD+ Program: The Case of the Consultation Process in Laos," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yvonne Hargita & Lukas Giessen & Sven Günter, 2020. "Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Chervier, Colas & Costedoat, Sébastien, 2017. "Heterogeneous Impact of a Collective Payment for Environmental Services Scheme on Reducing Deforestation in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 148-159.
    3. McGrath, F.L. & Carrasco, L.R. & Leimona, B., 2017. "How auctions to allocate payments for ecosystem services contracts impact social equity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 44-55.
    4. Veronesi, Marcella & Reutemann, Tim & Zabel, Astrid & Engel, Stefanie, 2015. "Designing REDD+ schemes when forest users are not forest landowners: Evidence from a survey-based experiment in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 46-57.
    5. Chervier, Colas & Le Velly, Gwenolé & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, 2019. "When the Implementation of Payments for Biodiversity Conservation Leads to Motivation Crowding-out: A Case Study From the Cardamoms Forests, Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 499-510.
    6. Kissinger, Gabrielle & Gupta, Aarti & Mulder, Ivo & Unterstell, Natalie, 2019. "Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 256-269.
    7. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    8. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Hong, 2018. "Governmentality within REDD+: Optimizing incentives and efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 611-622.
    9. Nhem, Sareth & Lee, Young Jin & Phin, Sopheap, 2017. "Sustainable management of forest in view of media attention to REDD+ policy, opportunity and impact in Cambodia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 10-21.
    10. Bas Arts & Jelle Behagel & Jessica de Koning & Marieke van der Zon, 2023. "Community Forest Management: Weak States or Strong Communities?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 336-345.
    11. Dong, Jiayun & Liang, Wenyuan & Fu, Yimin & Liu, Weiping & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Impact of devolved forest tenure reform on formal credit access for households: Evidence from Fujian, China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 486-498.
    12. Long, Hexing & de Jong, Wil & Yiwen, Zhang & Liu, Jinlong, 2021. "Institutional choices between private management and user group management during forest devolution: A case study of forest allocation in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Nyanghura, Qambemeda M. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Börner, Jan, 2024. "Incentives for biodiversity conservation under asymmetric land ownership," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Kamel Bel Hadj Miled, 2023. "Microfinance and women entrepreneurship development: evidence from Tunisia," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Shinbrot, Xoco A. & Holmes, Ignacia & Gauthier, Madeleine & Tschakert, Petra & Wilkins, Zoë & Baragón, Lydia & Opúa, Berta & Potvin, Catherine, 2022. "Natural and financial impacts of payments for forest carbon offset: A 14 year-long case study in an indigenous community in Panama," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Stibniati S Atmadja & Erin O Sills, 2016. "What Is a “Community Perception” of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Melissa Marschke & Ouk Lykhim & Nong Kim, 2014. "Can Local Institutions Help Sustain Livelihoods in an Era of Fish Declines and Persistent Environmental Change? A Cambodian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Grima, Nelson & Singh, Simron J. & Smetschka, Barbara & Ringhofer, Lisa, 2016. "Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 24-32.
    19. Aguilar-Gómez, Carlos R. & Arteaga-Reyes, Tizbe T. & Gómez-Demetrio, William & Ávila-Akerberg, Víctor D. & Pérez-Campuzano, Enrique, 2020. "Differentiated payments for environmental services: A review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    20. Xiangzheng Deng & Chunhong Zhao & Yingzhi Lin & Tao Zhang & Yi Qu & Fan Zhang & Zhan Wang & Feng Wu, 2014. "Downscaling the Impacts of Large-Scale LUCC on Surface Temperature along with IPCC RCPs: A Global Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1122-:d:1660992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.