IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p763-d1627447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy for the Conversion of 2D to 3D Cadastral Maps by Standardizing the Height Limit of Land Rights Space Based on Land Use/Land Cover

Author

Listed:
  • Fransisko Rohanda Rebong

    (Department of Geodesy and Geomatics, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
    Current address: The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Bekasi Regency 17530, Indonesia.)

  • Irwan Meilano

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Vera Sadarviana

    (Science, Engineering, and Innovation of Geodesy, Research Group, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Andri Hernandi

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Rizqi Abdulharis

    (Spatial System and Cadastre Research Group, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Resy Meilani

    (Department of Geodesy and Geomatics, Faculty of Earth Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study examines the conversion strategy of 2D to 3D cadastral maps by standardizing the height limits of land rights based on LU/LC. To achieve 3D cadastral maps, the research proposes a conversion strategy considering height factors. The height dimension of cadastral maps faces challenges in determining maximum heights for features like buildings, given varying regional regulations. As a solution, the concept of surface feature height (SFH) is applied along with LU/LC classification. Economic considerations, such as state revenue from taxes, are also factored into the proposed height limits. The results indicate that building/property heights in Bekasi Regency show significant development potential. In the residential sector, the maximum height reaches 24 m, lower than Bekasi City (48 m) and Bandung City (30 m). In the industrial sector, while heights can reach 25 m, the regulatory limit is only 9 m, posing challenges for investment. In the commercial sector, the maximum height can reach 45 m, but the low regulatory limit of 10 m restricts further development. This research provides a foundation for policy development and an effective 3D cadastral system, emphasizing the need for Bekasi Regency to re-evaluate its building height regulations to maximize its development potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Fransisko Rohanda Rebong & Irwan Meilano & Vera Sadarviana & Andri Hernandi & Rizqi Abdulharis & Resy Meilani, 2025. "Strategy for the Conversion of 2D to 3D Cadastral Maps by Standardizing the Height Limit of Land Rights Space Based on Land Use/Land Cover," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:763-:d:1627447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Lauermann, 2022. "Vertical Gentrification: A 3D Analysis of Luxury Housing Development in New York City," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(3), pages 772-780, March.
    2. Ashenafi Mehari & Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, 2023. "A Land Use Planning Literature Review: Literature Path, Planning Contexts, Optimization Methods, and Bibliometric Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-41, October.
    3. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    4. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Burak Uşak & Volkan Çağdaş & Abdullah Kara, 2024. "Current Cadastral Trends—A Literature Review of the Last Decade," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Dwi Budi Martono & Trias Aditya & S Subaryono & Prijono Nugroho, 2022. "Cadastre Typology as a Baseline for Incremental Improvement of Spatial Cadastre in Jakarta: Towards a Complete Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Hamed Olfat & Behnam Atazadeh & Farshad Badiee & Yiqun Chen & Davood Shojaei & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "A Proposal for Streamlining 3D Digital Cadastral Data Lifecycle," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Tekavec, Jernej & Lisec, Anka, 2020. "Cadastral data as a source for 3D indoor modelling," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Nakajima, Kentaro & Takano, Keisuke, 2023. "Estimating the effect of land use regulation on land price: At the kink point of building height limits in Fukuoka," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Asghari, Ali & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas, 2020. "A structured framework for 3D cadastral data validation − a case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Dimitrios Kitsakis & Eftychia Kalogianni & Efi Dimopoulou, 2022. "Public Law Restrictions in the Context of 3D Land Administration—Review on Legal and Technical Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Griffith-Charles, Charisse & Sutherland, Michael, 2020. "3D cadastres for densely occupied informal situations: Necessity and possibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Cemellini, Barbara & van Oosterom, Peter & Thompson, Rod & de Vries, Marian, 2020. "Design, development and usability testing of an LADM compliant 3D Cadastral prototype system," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Gkeli, Maria & Potsiou, Chryssy & Ioannidis, Charalabos, 2020. "A technical solution for 3D crowdsourced cadastral surveys," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Ghawana, Tarun & Sargent, Jason & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Khandelwal, Pradeep & Rahman, Subu, 2020. "3D Cadastres in India: Examining the status and potential for land administration and management in Delhi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Fatih Döner & Samet Şirin, 2020. "3D Digital Representation of Cadastral Data in Turkey—Apartments Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Lvhua Wang & Xinxin Zhou & Jian Shen & Shuting Zhou, 2024. "Geovisualization: an optimization algorithm of viewpoint generation for 3D cadastral property units," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 91-116, January.
    6. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Zhang, Junfu, 2023. "JUE Insight: Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation Using a Shadow Price Approach," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Julia Velastegui-Cáceres & Víctor M. Rodríguez-Espinosa & Oswaldo Padilla-Almeida, 2020. "Urban Cadastral Situation in Ecuador: Analysis to Determine the Degree of Proximity of the Cadastral Systems to the 3D Cadastral Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    10. Kornelia Grzelka & Karolina Pargieła & Aleksandra Jasińska & Artur Warchoł & Jarosław Bydłosz, 2024. "Registration of Objects for 3D Cadastre: An Integrated Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Golob, Peter & Lisec, Anka, 2022. "Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Bhatt, Vipul & Liao, Mouhua & Zhao, Min Qiang, 2023. "Government policy and land price dynamics: A quantitative assessment of China’s factor market reforms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Gyourko, Joe & Krimmel, Jacob, 2021. "The impact of local residential land use restrictions on land values across and within single family housing markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Milyausha R. Pinskaya & Rodion V. Balakin, 2023. "Fiscal Implications of a Complete Conversion to Taxation of Property of Organizations in Russia on the Basis of Cadastral Value," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(4), pages 834-860.
    15. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Remi Jedwab & Prakash Loungani & Anthony Yezer, 2019. "How Should We Measure City Size? Theory and Evidence Within and Across Rich and Poor Countries," Working Papers 2019-11, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    18. Lima, Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade & Silveira Neto, Raul da Mota, 2019. "Zoning ordinances and the housing market in developing countries: Evidence from Brazilian municipalities," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Barr, Jason, 2022. "The economics of skyscrapers: A synthesis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:763-:d:1627447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.