IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p716-d1621686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Women’s Preferences for Urban Green Spaces by Using the Fuzzy-Set Quantitative Comparative Analysis Method: The Case of Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Menghan Li

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    Institute of Urbanization Strategy and Architecture Research, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Jun Luo

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    Institute of Urbanization Strategy and Architecture Research, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGSs) for women align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and contribute positively to women’s well-being. However, research on women’s preferences for green spaces is lacking. This study uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the causal complexity of multiple built environment characteristics that drive women’s preferences for UGS at different times. Results show that no single characteristic of the built environment is necessary and sufficient to determine women’s preferred UGS. Six configurational paths are identified as driving female preferences, among which time, security, and public service facilities have the strongest impact. This study aims to offer novel research perspectives and methodological support for the development of inclusive and sustainable UGS.

Suggested Citation

  • Menghan Li & Jun Luo, 2025. "Investigating Women’s Preferences for Urban Green Spaces by Using the Fuzzy-Set Quantitative Comparative Analysis Method: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:716-:d:1621686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C Cindy Fan & Mingjie Sun & Siqi Zheng, 2011. "Migration and Split Households: A Comparison of Sole, Couple, and Family Migrants in Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(9), pages 2164-2185, September.
    2. Falk, Armin & Hermle, Johannes, 2018. "Relationship of Gender Differences in Preferences to Economic Development and Gender Equality," IZA Discussion Papers 12059, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Bhuvanachithra Chidambaram & Joachim Scheiner, 2021. "Leisure Quality among German Parents—Exploring Urbanity, Mobility, and Partner Interaction as Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grosch, Kerstin & Fischer, Sabine, 2024. "Gender equivalence in overconfidence A large-scale experimental study in a non-WEIRD country," Department for Strategy and Innovation Working Paper Series 02/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Valencia Caicedo, Felipe & Dohmen, Thomas & Pondorfer, Andreas, 2023. "Religion and cooperation across the globe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 479-489.
    3. Cameron Harwick, 2023. "Money’s mutation of the modern moral mind: The Simmel hypothesis and the cultural evolution of WEIRDness," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1571-1592, November.
    4. Saheed Olanrewaju Jabaar, PhD & Hadiza Hafiz, PhD & Mujtaba Lawan, PhD, 2024. "Value Preference and Academic Performance of Pre- Service Teachers in Kano State: Implication for Counselling and Curriculum Development," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3187-3199, August.
    5. Bauer, Michal & Chytilová, Julie & Miguel, Edward, 2020. "Using survey questions to measure preferences: Lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Rainer Kotschy & Uwe Sunde, 2023. "Have Preferences Become More Similar Worldwide?," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 436, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    7. Sylvie Démurger & Hui Xu, 2011. "Left-Behind Children and Return Decisions of Rural Migrants in China," Post-Print halshs-00625636, HAL.
    8. Kai Ruggeri & Amma Panin & Milica Vdovic & Bojana Većkalov & Nazeer Abdul-Salaam & Jascha Achterberg & Carla Akil & Jolly Amatya & Kanchan Amatya & Thomas Lind Andersen & Sibele D. Aquino & Arjoon Aru, 2022. "The globalizability of temporal discounting," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1386-1397, October.
    9. Wang, Chunchao & Zhang, Chenglei & Ni, Jinlan & Zhang, Haifeng & Zhang, Junsen, 2019. "Family migration in China: Do migrant children affect parental settlement intention?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 416-428.
    10. Charlotte Bartels & Eva Sierminska & Carsten Schröder, 2024. "Wealth Creators or Inheritors? Unpacking the Gender Wealth Gap from Bottom to Top and Young to Old," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1212, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    11. Zhen Wang & Mingzhi Hu & Yu Zhang & Zhuo Chen, 2022. "Housing Security and Settlement Intentions of Migrants in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Markowsky, Eva, 2022. "Culture, Female Labour Force Participation, and Selective Migrationː New Meta-Analytic Evidence," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 65, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    13. Aldén, Lina & Neuman, Emma, 2022. "Culture and the gender gap in choice of major: An analysis using sibling comparisons," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 346-373.
    14. Yannick V. Markhof, 2020. "Divide to Conquer? Latent Preference Types and Country-level Heterogeneity," CSAE Working Paper Series 2020-05, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    15. Burbano, Vanessa & Padilla, Nicolas & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "Gender Differences in Preferences for Meaning at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 13053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Junjie Gao & Lyubing Feng & Xianguo Yao, 2021. "Information Transmission Mechanism of Inequality of Opportunity and Effort on Settlement Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Chen, S. & Doerr, S. & Frost, J. & Gambacorta, L. & Shin, H.S., 2023. "The fintech gender gap," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. Boneva, Teodora & Brás-Monteiro, Ana & Golin, Marta & Rauh, Christopher, 2024. "Are Men's Preferences for Couple Equity Misperceived? Evidence from Six Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 17493, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Davoli, Maddalena & Rodríguez-Planas, Núria, 2021. "Preferences, Financial Literacy, and Economic Development," IZA Discussion Papers 14759, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. van den Berg, Gerard J. & Kesternich, Iris & Müller, Gerrit & Siflinger, Bettina M., 2024. "Reciprocity and the interaction between the unemployed and the caseworker," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:716-:d:1621686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.