IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p671-d1617936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Tenure Governance in the First Decades of the 21st Century: Progress, Challenges, and Lessons from 18 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Wegerif

    (Development Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Mohamed Coulibaly

    (Faculty of Public Law, Kurukanfuga University of Bamako, Bamako BP E2528, Mali)

  • Hubert Ouedraogo

    (Independent Consultant, Ouagadougou BP 6082, Burkina Faso)

Abstract

This article is based on a review of the governance of land tenure in 18 countries—16 in Africa and 2 in Asia—carried out from 2021 to 2023. It uses international guidelines on land policy and tenure governance as benchmarks to assess progress in each country through reviewing policy documents and literature, and obtaining inputs from key informants. This paper shows that, during the last decade, there has been significant progress in land tenure policies that have improved the recognition of customary and other communal land rights and improved women’s land rights. The formal registration of individual rights to customary and community land has now been achieved cost-effectively, with more rights going to women in a number of settings, and without leading to widespread commoditisation or land dispossession. There is a mixed picture, with countries trying different ways to grapple with common challenges such as securing customary tenure rights, unlocking development potential, improving women’s land rights, and managing the contesting interests in land. There are important examples of best practices in some countries that can be learnt from, such as the legislation of Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) requirements and processes of large-scale land rights registration. Despite progress achieved in several countries, too many people are not enjoying the benefits of improved land tenure security; some countries still need to adopt new legislation, while others need to improve their implementation of existing legislation. More needs to be learnt from the range of different approaches to dealing with land tenure as national governments attempt to find solutions that accommodate contesting interests. The lessons and trends identified will be of value to country-level and international work on improving land tenure governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Wegerif & Mohamed Coulibaly & Hubert Ouedraogo, 2025. "Land Tenure Governance in the First Decades of the 21st Century: Progress, Challenges, and Lessons from 18 Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:671-:d:1617936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus Deininger, 2003. "Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15125.
    2. Stefan Andreasson, 2006. "Stand and Deliver: Private Property and the Politics of Global Dispossession," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54, pages 3-22, March.
    3. Yuh Jin Bae, 2023. "Analyzing the Connection between Customary Land Rights and Land Grabbing: A Case Study of Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. repec:phd:pjdevt:pjd_2001_vol__xxviii_no__2-c is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Myers, Gregory & Sanjak, Jolyne, 2022. "Reflections on the limited impact of the VGGT in sub saharan Africa and opportunities for its future with lessons from Nigeria and Sierra Leone," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Stefan Andreasson, 2006. "Stand and Deliver: Private Property and the Politics of Global Dispossession," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(1), pages 3-22, March.
    7. Chimhowu, Admos, 2019. "The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 897-903.
    8. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus & Mahofa, Godfrey & Nyakulama, Rhona, 2021. "Sustaining land registration benefits by addressing the challenges of reversion to informality in Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Howard Stein & Rie Odgaard & Kelly Askew & Faustin Maganga, 2024. "The World Bank and Rural Land Titling in Africa: The Case of Tanzania," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(6), pages 1150-1181, November.
    10. Danilo Antonio & Solomon Njogu & Hellen Nyamweru & John Gitau, 2021. "Transforming Land Administration Practices through the Application of Fit-For-Purpose Technologies: Country Case Studies in Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joireman, Sandra F. & Tchatchoua-Djomo, Rosine, 2023. "Post-conflict restitution of customary land: Guidelines and trajectories of change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Michael Webber, 2012. "The Dynamics of Primitive Accumulation: With Application to Rural China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(3), pages 560-579, March.
    3. Michael Webber, 2012. "Making Capitalism in Rural China," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14446.
    4. Selorm Kobla Kugbega & Prince Young Aboagye, 2021. "Farmer-herder conflicts, tenure insecurity and farmer’s investment decisions in Agogo, Ghana," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Sasu, Alexander & Javed, Arshad & Imran, Muhammad & Squires, Graham, 2024. "Land banking, land price and Ghana’s informal land markets: A relational complexity approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Olofsson, Malin, 2021. "Expanding commodity frontiers and the emergence of customary land markets: A case study of tree-crop farming in Venda, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Rincón Barajas, Jorge A. & Kubitza, Christoph & Lay, Jann, 2024. "Large-scale acquisitions of communal land in the Global South: Assessing the risks and formulating policy recommendations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Burns, Anthony Francis & Rajabifard, Abbas & Shojaei, Davood, 2023. "Undertaking land administration reform: Is there a better way?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Biddulph, Robin & Hillbom, Ellen, 2020. "Registration of private interests in land in a community lands policy setting: An exploratory study in Meru district, Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Olabisi S. Obaitor & Marion Stellmes & Tobia Lakes, 2024. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Gentrification Processes in Intracity Slums in the Lagos Megacity," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    12. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    13. Grimm, Michael & Klasen, Stephan, 2007. "Geography vs. Institutions at the Village Level," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Göttingen 2007 9, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. Foley-Fisher, Nathan & McLaughlin, Eoin, 2016. "Capitalising on the Irish land question: land reform and state banking in Ireland, 1891–1938," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 71-109, April.
    15. Sunderlin, William D. & Dewi, Sonya & Puntodewo, Atie & Müller, Daniel & Angelsen, Arild & Epprecht, Michael, 2008. "Why forests are important for global poverty alleviation: A spatial explanation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2).
    16. Lenyeletse V. Basupi & Claire H. Quinn & Andrew J. Dougill, 2017. "Pastoralism and Land Tenure Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Conflicting Policies and Priorities in Ngamiland, Botswana," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    18. Leakey, Roger & Kranjac-Berisavljevic, Gordana & Caron, Patrick & Craufurd, Peter & Martin, Adrienne M. & McDonald, Andy & Abedini, Walter & Afiff, Suraya & Bakurin, Ndey & Bass, Steve & Hilbeck, Ange, 2009. "Impacts of AKST on development and sustainability goals," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    19. Kanu, Edmond Augustine & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2019. "An assessment of land reform policy processes in Sierra Leone: A network based approach," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2019-04, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    20. Bouquet, Emmanuelle, 2009. "State-Led Land Reform and Local Institutional Change: Land Titles, Land Markets and Tenure Security in Mexican Communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1390-1399, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:671-:d:1617936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.