IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p525-d1604127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Temporal Pervasiveness of Indigenous Settlement in Oak Landscapes of Southern New England, US, During the Late Holocene

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen J. Tulowiecki

    (Department of Geography & Sustainability Studies, 1 College Circle, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14423, USA)

  • Brice B. Hanberry

    (USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Rapid City, SD 57702, USA)

  • Marc D. Abrams

    (204 Forest Resources Building, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

Abstract

The relative influence of climate and Indigenous cultural burning on past forest composition in southern New England, US, remains debated. Employing varied analyses, this study compared data on Indigenous settlements from over 5000 years before present (YBP) with relative tree abundances estimated from pollen and land survey records. Results suggested that fire-tolerant vegetation, mainly oak ( Quercus spp.), was more abundant near Indigenous settlements from 4955 to 205 YBP (i.e., 86–91% fire-tolerant trees), and significantly ( p < 0.05) higher from 3205 to 205 YBP; fire-tolerant vegetation was less abundant away from settlements, where it also experienced greater fluctuations. Correlative models showed that warmer temperatures and distance to Indigenous settlement, which are both indicators of fire, were important predictors in the 17th–18th centuries of fire-tolerant tree abundance; soil variables were less important and their relationships with vegetation were unclear. A marked increase in oak abundance occurred above 8 °C mean annual temperature and within 16 km of major Indigenous settlements. Pyrophilic vegetation was most correlated with distance to Indigenous villages in areas with 7–9 °C mean annual temperature, typical of higher latitudes and elevations that usually supported northern hardwoods. Widespread burning in warmer areas potentially weakened relationships between distance and pyrophilic abundance. Indigenous land use imprinted upon warmer areas conducive to burning created patterns in fire-tolerant vegetation in southern New England, plausibly affecting most low-elevation areas. Results imply that restoration of fire-dependent species and of barrens, savannas, and woodlands of oak in southern New England benefit from cultural burning.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J. Tulowiecki & Brice B. Hanberry & Marc D. Abrams, 2025. "Spatial and Temporal Pervasiveness of Indigenous Settlement in Oak Landscapes of Southern New England, US, During the Late Holocene," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:525-:d:1604127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paciorek, Christopher J. & McLachlan, Jason S., 2009. "Mapping Ancient Forests: Bayesian Inference for Spatio-Temporal Trends in Forest Composition Using the Fossil Pollen Proxy Record," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 608-622.
    2. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    3. Christopher J Paciorek & Simon J Goring & Andrew L Thurman & Charles V Cogbill & John W Williams & David J Mladenoff & Jody A Peters & Jun Zhu & Jason S McLachlan, 2016. "Statistically-Estimated Tree Composition for the Northeastern United States at Euro-American Settlement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    2. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    4. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "On-line monitoring of power curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1487-1493.
    6. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    7. Cao, Jason & Tao, Tao, 2025. "Can an identified environmental correlate of car ownership serve as a practical planning tool?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Dursun Delen & Hamed M. Zolbanin & Durand Crosby & David Wright, 2021. "To imprison or not to imprison: an analytics model for drug courts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 101-124, August.
    9. Doruk Cengiz & Arindrajit Dube & Attila S. Lindner & David Zentler-Munro, 2021. "Seeing Beyond the Trees: Using Machine Learning to Estimate the Impact of Minimum Wages on Labor Market Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 28399, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Zhou, Jing & Li, Wei & Wang, Jiaxin & Ding, Shuai & Xia, Chengyi, 2019. "Default prediction in P2P lending from high-dimensional data based on machine learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    11. Lu, Yingjie & Li, Tao & Hu, Hui & Zeng, Xuemei, 2023. "Short-term prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration based on machine learning with different decomposition methods in arid areas of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Bohdan M. Pavlyshenko, 2019. "Machine-Learning Models for Sales Time Series Forecasting," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Jason R. W. Merrick & Claire A. Dorsey & Bo Wang & Martha Grabowski & John R. Harrald, 2022. "Measuring Prediction Accuracy in a Maritime Accident Warning System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 819-827, February.
    15. Buzna, Luboš & De Falco, Pasquale & Ferruzzi, Gabriella & Khormali, Shahab & Proto, Daniela & Refa, Nazir & Straka, Milan & van der Poel, Gijs, 2021. "An ensemble methodology for hierarchical probabilistic electric vehicle load forecasting at regular charging stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Adler, Werner & Lausen, Berthold, 2009. "Bootstrap estimated true and false positive rates and ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 718-729, January.
    17. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2017. "Predicting recessions with boosted regression trees," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 745-759.
    18. Andrea Sciandra & Alessio Surian & Livio Finos, 2021. "Supervised Machine Learning Methods to Disclose Action and Information in “U.N. 2030 Agenda” Social Media Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 689-699, August.
    19. Mirosław Parol & Paweł Piotrowski & Piotr Kapler & Mariusz Piotrowski, 2021. "Forecasting of 10-Second Power Demand of Highly Variable Loads for Microgrid Operation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Chen, Yu-Kai & Chiu, Shih-Hao & Lu, Jye-Chyi & Vu, Thuy-Linh, 2022. "An innovative demand forecasting approach for the server industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:525-:d:1604127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.