IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1498-d1478738.html

Analysis of the Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Large-Scale Land Acquisition Projects in Southeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Han

    (School of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Institute of Natural Resource Governance, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xiaoting Han

    (School of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Institute of Natural Resource Governance, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zichun Pan

    (College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Southeast Asia is an essential region for companies carrying out large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs). Exploring the distribution patterns and influencing factors of LSLA projects in this region is of great practical significance for summarizing the characteristics of LSLA projects in Southeast Asia, for gaining a thorough understanding of LSLA project development rules, and for formulating reasonable policies to guide local LSLA projects. This study explores the spatial distribution and influencing factors of LSLA projects in Southeast Asia using the mean center method, the kernel density estimation method, and the grey correlation method. The findings indicate the following: Firstly, the majority of LSLA projects in Southeast Asia are located in the Indo-China Peninsula, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, and other countries, which represent significant regions of interest for LSLA projects in this region. Secondly, the spatial distribution of LSLA intention projects and LSLA contract projects in Southeast Asia is similar, whereas LSLA production projects differ from the former two. Thirdly, the scale of LSLA projects in Southeast Asia is closely related to the host country’s natural resources, socio-economic conditions, governance, and market environment. The total GDP, per capita arable land area, net foreign direct investment inflow, and political stability have been identified as exerting a significant influence on investment corporations’ selection of LSLA host countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Han & Xiaoting Han & Zichun Pan, 2024. "Analysis of the Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Large-Scale Land Acquisition Projects in Southeast Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1498-:d:1478738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.
    2. Pankhuri Gaur, 2022. "India’s withdrawal from RCEP: neutralising national trade concerns," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 270-288, April.
    3. Salman Ata & Babar Shahbaz & Muhammad Arif Watto & Muhammad Tahir Siddiqui, 2019. "Access and exclusion: case of transnational ‘land grabbing’ in Pakistan," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 331-346, July.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2263 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Martin Rudbeck Jepsen & Matilda Palm & Thilde Bech Bruun, 2019. "What Awaits Myanmar’s Uplands Farmers? Lessons Learned from Mainland Southeast Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Promkhambut, Arunee & Yokying, Phanwin & Woods, Kevin & Fisher, Micah & Li Yong, Ming & Manorom, Kanokwan & Baird, Ian G. & Fox, Jefferson, 2023. "Rethinking agrarian transition in Southeast Asia through rice farming in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Herrmann, Raoul T., 2017. "Large-Scale Agricultural Investments and Smallholder Welfare: A Comparison of Wage Labor and Outgrower Channels in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 294-310.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enze Han & Qiongyu Huang, 2021. "Global Commodity Markets, Chinese Demand for Maize, and Deforestation in Northern Myanmar," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Liao, Chuan & Jung, Suhyun & Brown, Daniel G. & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Does land tenure change accelerate deforestation? A matching-based four-country comparison," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Chiarella, Cristina & Rufin, Philippe & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Bey, Adia & Lisboa, Sá Nogueira & Zavale, Helder & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2024. "Impacts of large-scale forestry investments on neighboring small-scale agriculture in northern Mozambique," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 145, pages 1-15.
    4. Chiarella, Cristina & Rufin, Philippe & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Bey, Adia & Lisboa, Sá Nogueira & Zavale, Helder & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2024. "Impacts of large-scale forestry investments on neighboring small-scale agriculture in northern Mozambique," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Lay, Jann & Nolte, Kerstin & Sipangule, Kacana, 2021. "Large-scale farms in Zambia: Locational patterns and spillovers to smallholder agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Nuhu, Ahmed Salim & Awokuse, Titus O. & Jayne, Thomas S. & Muyanga, Milu & Aromolaran, Adebayo & Adelaja, Adesoji, 2020. "Spillover effects of Medium-Scale Farms on Smallholder Behavior and Welfare: Evidence from Nigeria," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304606, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Amadu, Festus O. & McNamara, Paul E. & Davis, Kristin E., 2021. "Soil health and grain yield impacts of climate resilient agriculture projects: Evidence from southern Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Van Den Broeck, G & Van Hoyweghen, K & Maertens, M, "undated". "Horticultural exports and food security in Senegal," Working Papers 258322, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    9. Fabry, Anna & Van den Broeck, Goedele & Maertens, Miet, 2022. "Decent work in global food value chains: Evidence from Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Chilombo, Andrew & Van Der Horst, Dan, 2021. "Livelihoods and coping strategies of local communities on previous customary land in limbo of commercial agricultural development: Lessons from the farm block program in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Duncan, Nicolette & de Silva, Sanjiv & Conallin, John & Freed, Sarah & Akester, Michael & Baumgartner, Lee & McCartney, Matthew & Dubois, Mark & Senaratna Sellamuttu, Sonali, 2021. "Fish for whom?: Integrating the management of social complexities into technical investments for inclusive, multi-functional irrigation," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    12. Wegenast, Tim & Richetta, Cécile & Krauser, Mario & Leibik, Alexander, 2022. "Grabbed trust? The impact of large-scale land acquisitions on social trust in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Hendrik Feyaerts & Goedele Van den Broeck & Miet Maertens, 2020. "Global and local food value chains in Africa: A review," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 143-157, January.
    14. Meilin Ma & Jessie Lin & Richard J. Sexton, 2022. "The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 111-133, January.
    15. Castet, Antoine, 2024. "The impact of large-scale land acquisitions on child food insecurity in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Promkhambut, Arunee & Yokying, Phanwin & Woods, Kevin & Fisher, Micah & Li Yong, Ming & Manorom, Kanokwan & Baird, Ian G. & Fox, Jefferson, 2023. "Rethinking agrarian transition in Southeast Asia through rice farming in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Hongbi Peng & Feng Yang, 2024. "Research on the Competitiveness and Complementarity of Agricultural Trade between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Ian G. Baird, 2024. "“Organic” rice: different implications from process and product environmental verification approaches in Laos and Thailand," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1417-1430, December.
    19. Bin Yang & Jun He, 2021. "Global Land Grabbing: A Critical Review of Case Studies across the World," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Duyen, Tran Nhat Lam & Tien, Nguyen Dinh & Ngoc, Nong Nguyen Khanh & Thuy, Pham Thu & Tich, Vu Van, 2022. "Determinants of swidden communities’ land-use decision-making for different crops in Son La and Nghe An provinces, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1498-:d:1478738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.