IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1109-d1440176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Human Needs: A Study on the Spatial Justice of Medical Facility Services in Social Housing Communities in Guangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Ruixia Chao

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Desheng Xue

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Benshuo Wang

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

Abstract

Mainstream empirical studies on the spatial justice of medical facilities focus on equal accessibility or resource availability based on population scale, overlooking critiques that emphasize the importance of assessing inequality and the multidimensionality of human needs. However, access to medical care, particularly for vulnerable groups in social housing, often demands a higher level of consideration. Evaluating whether people can access the facilities they demand and expect is crucial for improving living standards. This study categorizes medical facilities into primary healthcare and hospital facilities based on their service grade, and integrates survey-based satisfaction into a spatial analysis of cost–distance-based accessibility and gravity-2SFCA-based availability. Analysis reveals that satisfaction primarily correlates with two factors: the distance to primary healthcare and the ease of reaching hospital facilities. While low accessibility to primary healthcare contributes to the evident distribution injustice of medical resources, satisfaction with service quality and scope is more strongly associated with the ease of reaching hospitals. To reduce injustice in social housing, specific remedies are needed to improve the difficult conditions for accessing primary healthcare faced by communities such as Guangdan, Likang, and Jinshazhou. Moreover, improving the easiness of reaching hospital facilities may significantly enhance the resident satisfaction with the level of medical service provided. Findings obtained in this research may not only enlighten Guangzhou’s urban planning, but may also be noteworthy for developing livable cities, which people anticipated.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruixia Chao & Desheng Xue & Benshuo Wang, 2024. "Evaluating Human Needs: A Study on the Spatial Justice of Medical Facility Services in Social Housing Communities in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1109-:d:1440176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianhua Ni & Jinyin Wang & Yikang Rui & Tianlu Qian & Jiechen Wang, 2015. "An Enhanced Variable Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Residential Care Facilities in Nanjing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Michael A. Niedzielski & E. Eric Boschmann, 2014. "Travel Time and Distance as Relative Accessibility in the Journey to Work," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(6), pages 1156-1182, November.
    3. Paul Chatterton, 2010. "Seeking the urban common: Furthering the debate on spatial justice," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 625-628, December.
    4. Ya Wang & Alan Murie, 2011. "The New Affordable and Social Housing Provision System in China: Implications for Comparative Housing Studies," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 237-254.
    5. Diez Roux, A.V. & Evenson, K.R. & McGinn, A.P. & Brown, D.G. & Moore, L. & Brines, S. & Jacobs Jr., D.R., 2007. "Availability of recreational resources and physical activity in adults," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(3), pages 493-499.
    6. Muhammad Tauhidur Rahman & Kh. Md. Nahiduzzaman, 2019. "Examining the Walking Accessibility, Willingness, and Travel Conditions of Residents in Saudi Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Michael Harloe, 2001. "Social Justice and the City: The New ‘Liberal Formulation’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 889-897, December.
    8. Justus Uitermark & Walter Nicholls & Maarten Loopmans, 2012. "Cities and Social Movements: Theorizing beyond the Right to the City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2546-2554, November.
    9. Jie Chen & Zan Yang & Ya Ping Wang, 2014. "The New Chinese Model of Public Housing: A Step Forward or Backward?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 534-550, June.
    10. Yukio Sadahiro, 2005. "Spatiotemporal analysis of the distribution of urban facilities in terms of accessibility," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(1), pages 61-84, March.
    11. Kurt Iveson, 2011. "Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 250-259, April.
    12. Elster, Jon, 1991. "Local justice : How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 273-291, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jie & Nong, Huifu, 2016. "The heterogeneity of market supply effects of public housing provision: Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 115-127.
    2. Chunyan He & Ding Li & Qiong Ma & Daichun Yi, 2022. "City Bias: Affordable Housing Accessibility Assessment—Evidence From 153 Prefectural Cities in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    3. Hu, Fox Z.Y. & Qian, Jiwei, 2017. "Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 454-460.
    4. Xiang CAI, 2018. "Determinants Of Affordable Housing Allocation: Common Perspectives From Local Officials," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 227-237, July.
    5. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Jie Chen & Xuehui Han, 2014. "The Evolution Of The Housing Market And Its Socioeconomic Impacts In The Post-Reform People'S Republic Of China: A Survey Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 652-670, September.
    6. Juan Yan & Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga, 2021. "Inclusionary Housing: An Evaluation of a New Public Rental Housing Governance Instrument in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2017. "Influences on the policy process in local government in Vietnam: The case of low-income housing policy in Da Nang City from 2005-2013," OSF Preprints zvbmc, Center for Open Science.
    8. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    9. Xiang Cai & Chin-Chang Tsai & Wei-Ning Wu, 2017. "Are They Neck and Neck in the Affordable Housing Policies? A Cross Case Comparison of Three Metropolitan Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    11. Lena Kilian & Anne Owen & Andy Newing & Diana Ivanova, 2022. "Exploring Transport Consumption-Based Emissions: Spatial Patterns, Social Factors, Well-Being, and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Li, Xin & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2016. "Neoliberalization and the Changing Roles of Stakeholders in State-Led Shantytown Redevelopment in Shenyang City, China," IZA Discussion Papers 10141, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Sophie Yarker, 2018. "Tangential attachments: Towards a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of cultural urban regeneration on local identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3421-3436, November.
    14. Clarke, Philippa J. & Ailshire, Jennifer A. & Nieuwenhuijsen, Els R. & de Kleijn - de Vrankrijker, Marijke W., 2011. "Participation among adults with disability: The role of the urban environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1674-1684, May.
    15. Luca Salvati & Ilaria Tombolini & Achille Ippolito & Margherita Carlucci, 2018. "Land quality and the city: Monitoring urban growth and land take in 76 Southern European metropolitan areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 691-712, July.
    16. Maedhbh Nic Lochlainn, 2021. "Networked Geographies of Digital Contention in Post‐Financial Crisis Ireland," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 441-455, September.
    17. Huffman, Sonya Kostova, 1999. "Changes of household consumption behavior during the transition from centrally-planned to market-oriented economy," ISU General Staff Papers 1999010108000013568, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Uwatt Uwatt, 2019. "Housing Sector, Economic Growth and Development: Conceptual Issues and Theoretical Underpinnings," Economic and Financial Review, Central Bank of Nigeria, vol. 57(4), December.
    19. Maria Karagianni, 2024. "The urban political ecology of the commons or commoning as a socio-natural process: The case of the Peri-Urban Gardening group in Thessaloniki," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1147-1167, May.
    20. Ashley Gunter & Kenneth Manuel, 2016. "A role for housing in development: Using housing as a catalyst for development in South Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 312-321, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1109-:d:1440176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.