IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p857-d1415243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Integrated Ecological Assessment along the Corridor of the Sichuan–Tibet Railway

Author

Listed:
  • Cuicui Ji

    (School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geo-Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China)

  • Hengcong Yang

    (School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Xiangjun Pei

    (State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geo-Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Xiaochao Zhang

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Lichuan Chen

    (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China)

  • Dan Liang

    (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China)

  • Yiming Cao

    (School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Jianping Pan

    (School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Maolin Chen

    (School of Smart City, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Abstract

Engineering activities along the Sichuan–Tibet Railway (STR) could cause land degradation and threaten the surrounding ecological security. It is crucial to evaluate the integrated land ecology during and after the construction of this project. This study assesses the land ecology along the STR corridor from 2000 to 2022 using a transfer matrix, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the PSR-TOPSIS model. The main results are as follows: (1) The novel comprehensive ecological assessment process including nine indicators is feasible. (2) The high-quality land ecological, surface vegetation, and environmental regions were concentrated in Ya’an and Nyingchi, whereas the low-quality regions were situated in Qamdo and Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. (3) There was an overall decline in the integrated land ecological quality along the STR from 2000 to 2022. While it steadily improved in the Ya’an and Nyingchi regions from 2010 to 2022, it continued to decline around the Qamdo region. (4) The most degraded land-use type during the 22 years was grassland, and farmland was the most secure land-use type. Overall, spatial analyses and examinations of residue disposal sites suggested that these locations have negatively impacted integrated land ecology since the beginning of the STR construction project. Our findings have implications for preserving the ecological ecosystem and ensuring the sustainability of the STR construction project.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuicui Ji & Hengcong Yang & Xiangjun Pei & Xiaochao Zhang & Lichuan Chen & Dan Liang & Yiming Cao & Jianping Pan & Maolin Chen, 2024. "Dynamic Integrated Ecological Assessment along the Corridor of the Sichuan–Tibet Railway," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:857-:d:1415243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aytun, Cengiz & Erdogan, Sinan & Pata, Ugur Korkut & Cengiz, Orhan, 2024. "Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Vulnerability on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiansheng Wu & Xuechen Li & Si Li & Chang Liu & Tengyun Yi & Yuhao Zhao, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Attribution Analysis of Urban Thermal Comfort in China from 2000 to 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Xiaofen Zhang & Zibibula Simayi & Shengtian Yang & Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Fang Shen & Yunyi Zhang, 2023. "Vulnerability Assessment of Ecological–Economic–Social Systems in Urban Agglomerations in Arid Regions—A Case Study of Urumqi–Changji–Shihezi Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Hanlong Gu & Chongyang Huan & Fengjiao Yang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecological Vulnerability and Its Influencing Factors in Shenyang City of China: Based on SRP Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Lin Liu & Wei Song & Yanjie Zhang & Ze Han & Han Li & Dazhi Yang & Zhanyun Wang & Qiang Huang, 2021. "Zoning of Ecological Restoration in the Qilian Mountain Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Yan Liu & Quaner Wen & Abbas Ali Chandio & Long Chen & Lu Gan, 2022. "Investment Risk Analysis for Green and Sustainable Planning of Rural Family: A Case Study of Tibetan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:857-:d:1415243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.