Author
Listed:
- Fuchao Li
(Changsha Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center, China Geological Survey, Changsha 410600, China
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
- Tian Nan
(Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
- Huang Zhang
(Changsha Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center, China Geological Survey, Changsha 410600, China
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
- Kun Luo
(Changsha Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center, China Geological Survey, Changsha 410600, China)
- Kui Xiang
(Changsha Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center, China Geological Survey, Changsha 410600, China)
- Yi Peng
(Changsha Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center, China Geological Survey, Changsha 410600, China)
Abstract
This study focuses on the Dongting Lake region in China and evaluates ecological vulnerability using the Sensitivity–Resilience–Pressure (SRP) framework, integrated with Spatial Principal Component Analysis (SPCA) to calculate the Ecological Vulnerability Index (EVI). The EVI values were classified into five levels using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method, and spatial autocorrelation analysis was applied to reveal spatial differentiation patterns. The Geodetector model was used to analyze the driving mechanisms of natural and socioeconomic factors on EVI, identifying key influencing variables. Furthermore, the LightGBM algorithm was used for feature optimization, followed by the construction of six machine learning models—Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Extremely Randomized Trees (ET), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), LightGBM, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—to conduct multi-class classification of ecological vulnerability. Model performance was assessed using ROC–AUC, accuracy, recall, confusion matrix, and Kappa coefficient, and the best-performing model was interpreted using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). The results indicate that: ① ecological vulnerability increased progressively from the core wetlands and riparian corridors to the transitional zones in the surrounding hills and mountains; ② a significant spatial clustering of ecological vulnerability was observed, with a Moran’s I index of 0.78; ③ Geodetector analysis identified the interaction between NPP ( q = 0.329) and precipitation (PRE, q = 0.268) as the dominant factor ( q = 0.50) influencing spatial variation of EVI; ④ the Random Forest model achieved the best classification performance (AUC = 0.954, F 1 score = 0.78), and SHAP analysis showed that NPP and PRE made the most significant contributions to model predictions. This study proposes a multi-method integrated decision support framework for assessing ecological vulnerability in lake wetland ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1435-:d:1697613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.