IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i10p1641-d1494857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gains and Losses of Cultivated Land Requisition–Compensation Balance: Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services Using Hubei Province as a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Qingsong He

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xu Jiang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (School of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economic and Business, Beijing 100000, China)

Abstract

The cultivated land requisition–compensation balance (CLRCB) policy is an important policy implemented by China to address the reduction in cultivated land and ensure food security. Although this policy has alleviated the loss of cultivated land quantity, it has had complex and diverse impacts on ecosystem services. Taking Hubei Province as the study area, this research explores the impact of the implementation of the CLRCB on ecosystem services and simulates the changes in ecosystem services in the study area in 2030 and the impact of CLRCB on the interactions among various services. The results show the following: (1) from 2000 to 2020, Hubei Province achieved a balance in the quantity of cultivated land through excessive compensation but failed to reach the goals of balancing cultivated land yield and productivity. (2) During the requisition–compensation process, habitat quality decreased by 501,862, and carbon storage lost 1.3 × 10 7 t, indicating negative ecological impacts; soil conservation services increased by 184.2 × 10 6 t, and water production increased by 21.29 × 10 8 m 3 . Within the cultivated land requisition–compensation area, habitat quality and carbon storage, as well as soil conservation and water production, exhibited synergistic relationships, while the remaining pairs of ecosystem services showed trade-off relationships. (3) The simulation of ecosystem services in 2030 indicates that soil conservation and water production are highest under the natural development scenario, while habitat quality and carbon storage are highest under the ecological protection scenario, both of which are superior to the urban development scenario. Under the natural development scenario, the trade-off and synergistic relationships among various ecosystem services in the cultivated land requisition–compensation area remain unchanged, while these relationships change significantly under the other two scenarios. This study emphasizes that future CLRCB should not only focus on maintaining the quantity of cultivated land but also consider the comprehensive benefits of ecosystem services, in order to achieve sustainable land-use management and ecological conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingsong He & Xu Jiang & Yang Zhang, 2024. "The Gains and Losses of Cultivated Land Requisition–Compensation Balance: Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services Using Hubei Province as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1641-:d:1494857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Jian & Tian, Lu & Zhang, Zimo & Zhao, Yan & Green, Sophie M. & Quine, Timothy A. & Liu, Hongyan & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2020. "Distinguishing the impacts of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    2. Liu, Chenyu & Song, Changqing & Ye, Sijing & Cheng, Feng & Zhang, Leina & Li, Chao, 2023. "Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Qie, Lu & Pu, Lijie & Tang, Pengfei & Liu, Rongjuan & Huang, Sihua & Xu, Fei & Zhong, Taiyang, 2023. "Gains and losses of farmland associated with farmland protection policy and urbanization in China: An integrated perspective based on goal orientation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhuochun Lin & Zejia Chen & Fengyu Zhang & Jiapei Li & Yifei Liufu & Lisiren Cao & Jinyao Lin, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Variations of Cropland Quality and Morphology Under the Requisition–Compensation Balance Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Hui Li & Qing Xu & Huiyi Qiu & Jiaheng Du & Zhenzhou Xu & Longying Liu & Zixiu Zhao & Zixin Zhu & Yun He, 2024. "Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Based on Ecosystem Service Bundles," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jingping & Jin, Xiaobin & Song, Jiapeng & Zhu, Wenjie & Zhou, Yinkang, 2024. "Semi-natural habitats: A comparative research between the European Union and China in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Guo, Baishu & Jin, Gui, 2025. "Beyond the land quantity: Rethinking the role of land quality in agriculture from the efficiency perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Pan, Huanhuan & Du, Ziqiang & Wu, Zhitao & Zhang, Hong & Ma, Keming, 2024. "Building ecosystem services-based ecological networks in energy and chemical industry areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    4. Deng, Guangyi & Jiang, Haibo & Ma, Shuai & Wen, Yang & He, Chunguang & Sheng, Lianxi & Gu, Dehai, 2025. "How water–energy–food services and their interactions change along multiple environmental gradients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Umwali, Edovia Dufatanye & Chen, Xi & Ma, Xuexi & Guo, Zengkun & Mbigi, Dickson & Zhang, Zhuo & Umugwaneza, Adeline & Gasirabo, Aboubakar & Umuhoza, Jeanine, 2025. "Integrated SSP-RCP Scenarios for Modeling the Impacts of Climate Change and Land Use on Ecosystem Services in East Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 504(C).
    6. Huanchao Guo & Shi He & Haitao Jing & Geding Yan & Hui Li, 2023. "Evaluation of the Impacts of Change in Land Use/Cover on Carbon Storage in Multiple Scenarios in the Taihang Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Binyu Ren & Qianfeng Wang & Rongrong Zhang & Xiaozhen Zhou & Xiaoping Wu & Qing Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services: Spatio-Temporal Analysis and the Spatial Response of Influencing Factors in Hainan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Yuqing Xiong & Hong Li & Meichen Fu & Xiuhua Ma & Lei Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Change Patterns in a Mining-Based City: A Case Study of Wu’an City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Yu, Xuan & Xu, Beiyuan & Yao, Rongjiang & Wei, Junhong & Tu, Tongbi & Chen, Zi, 2024. "Temporal dynamics of soil salinization due to vertical and lateral saltwater intrusion at an onshore aquaculture farm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    10. Zhou, Yang & Li, Peixuan & Zhang, Qi & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2025. "Socio-economic impacts, challenges, and strategies for whole-region comprehensive land consolidation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Chaolei Yang & Jingyuan Li & Shuwen Jiang & Yufeng Tian & Canfeng Li & Wantao Yang & Haichuan Duan & Zong Wei & Yong Huang, 2024. "The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Jie Liu & Jizhe Zhou & Qin He, 2024. "Impact of China’s Permanent Basic Farmland Protection Redline and Ecological Protection Redline on Water Conservation in the Loess Gully Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Yuchen Zhong & Jun Sun & Qi Wang & Dinghua Ou & Zhaonan Tian & Wuhaomiao Yu & Peixin Li & Xuesong Gao, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Driving Mechanisms of Cropland Long-Term Stability in China from 1990 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Qiushi Qu & Kuangshi Zhang & Jiangao Niu & Chiwei Xiao & Yanzhi Sun, 2025. "Spatial–Temporal Differentiation of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Taihang Mountains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Yuqing Xu & Fengjin Xiao, 2022. "Assessing Changes in the Value of Forest Ecosystem Services in Response to Climate Change in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Zhongqiu Zhang & Yufeng Zhang & Xiang Zhang, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanisms of Cultivated Land Intensive Utilization in the Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Ye, Sijing & Ren, Shuyi & Song, Changqing & Du, Zhenbo & Wang, Kuangxu & Du, Bin & Cheng, Feng & Zhu, Dehai, 2024. "Spatial pattern of cultivated land fragmentation in mainland China: Characteristics, dominant factors, and countermeasures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Xie, Zhen & Lin, Xiaorui & Jiang, Chun & Dang, Yuxuan & Kong, Xiangbin & Lin, Chenyu, 2025. "Establishment of an inter-provincial compensation system for farmland protection in China: A framework from zoning-integrative transferable development rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Han Liu & Yu Wang & Lingling Sang & Caisheng Zhao & Tengyun Hu & Hongtao Liu & Zheng Zhang & Shuyu Wang & Shuangxi Miao & Zhengshan Ju, 2023. "Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Changes in Cropland Quantity and Quality with Multi-Source Remote Sensing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Chengjun Yuan & Yingfang Weng & Kangning Xiong & Li Rong, 2024. "Projections of Land Use Change and Water Supply–Demand Assessment Based on Climate Change and Socioeconomic Scenarios: A Case Study of Guizhou Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1641-:d:1494857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.