IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1680-d1227060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Digital Mapping of Soil Salinity Levels and Assessing Their Spatial Transferability in Arid Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Magboul M. Sulieman

    (Department of Soil and Environment Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat 13314, Sudan)

  • Fuat Kaya

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Türkiye)

  • Mohammed A. Elsheikh

    (Department of Soil and Environment Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat 13314, Sudan)

  • Levent Başayiğit

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Türkiye)

  • Rosa Francaviglia

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, 00184 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of soil salinity distribution in arid regions is essential for making informed decisions regarding agricultural suitability, water resource management, and land use planning. A methodology was developed to identify soil salinity in Sudan by utilizing optical and radar-based satellite data as well as variables obtained from digital elevation models that are known to indicate variations in soil salinity. The methodology includes the transfer of models to areas where similar conditions prevail. A geographically coordinated database was established, incorporating a variety of environmental variables based on Google Earth Engine (GEE) and Electrical Conductivity (EC) measurements from the saturation extract of soil samples collected at three different depths (0–30, 30–60, and 60–90 cm). Thereafter, Multinomial Logistic Regression (MNLR) and Gradient Boosting Algorithm (GBM), were utilized to spatially classify the salinity levels in the region. To determine the applicability of the model trained at the reference site to the target area, a Multivariate Environmental Similarity Surface (MESS) analysis was conducted. The producer’s accuracy, user’s accuracy, and Tau index parameters were used to evaluate the model’s accuracy, and spatial confusion indices were computed to assess uncertainty. At different soil depths, Tau index values for the reference area ranged from 0.38 to 0.77, whereas values for target area samples ranged from 0.66 to 0.88, decreasing as the depth increased. Clay normalized ratio (CLNR), Salinity Index 1, and SAR data were important variables in the modeling. It was found that the subsoils in the middle and northwest regions of both the reference and target areas had a higher salinity level compared to the topsoil. This study highlighted the effectiveness of model transfer as a means of identifying and evaluating the management of regions facing significant salinity-related challenges. This approach can be instrumental in identifying alternative areas suitable for agricultural activities at a regional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Magboul M. Sulieman & Fuat Kaya & Mohammed A. Elsheikh & Levent Başayiğit & Rosa Francaviglia, 2023. "Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Digital Mapping of Soil Salinity Levels and Assessing Their Spatial Transferability in Arid Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1680-:d:1227060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuhn, Max, 2008. "Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i05).
    2. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    3. Fuat Kaya & Calogero Schillaci & Ali Keshavarzi & Levent Başayiğit, 2022. "Predictive Mapping of Electrical Conductivity and Assessment of Soil Salinity in a Western Türkiye Alluvial Plain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Ravinder Kumar & Pooja Dhansu & Neeraj Kulshreshtha & Mintu Ram Meena & Mahadevaswamy Huskur Kumaraswamy & Chinnaswamy Appunu & Manohar Lal Chhabra & Sstish Kumar Pandey, 2023. "Identification of Salinity Tolerant Stable Sugarcane Cultivars Using AMMI, GGE and Some Other Stability Parameters under Multi Environments of Salinity Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2019. "Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 487-498.
    2. Distaso, Walter & Roccazzella, Francesco & Vrins, Frédéric, 2023. "Business cycle and realized losses in the consumer credit industry," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2023007, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    3. Filgueiras, Roberto & Almeida, Thomé Simpliciano & Mantovani, Everardo Chartuni & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Fernandes-Filho, Elpídio Inácio & da Cunha, Fernando França & Venancio, Luan Peroni, 2020. "Soil water content and actual evapotranspiration predictions using regression algorithms and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Daniel Yoo & Gillian Divard & Marc Raynaud & Aaron Cohen & Tom D. Mone & John Thomas Rosenthal & Andrew J. Bentall & Mark D. Stegall & Maarten Naesens & Huanxi Zhang & Changxi Wang & Juliette Gueguen , 2024. "A Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Biopsy System For Kidney Transplant Patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Fitzpatrick, Trevor & Mues, Christophe, 2016. "An empirical comparison of classification algorithms for mortgage default prediction: evidence from a distressed mortgage market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 427-439.
    6. Rachel Sippy & Daniel F Farrell & Daniel A Lichtenstein & Ryan Nightingale & Megan A Harris & Joseph Toth & Paris Hantztidiamantis & Nicholas Usher & Cinthya Cueva Aponte & Julio Barzallo Aguilar & An, 2020. "Severity Index for Suspected Arbovirus (SISA): Machine learning for accurate prediction of hospitalization in subjects suspected of arboviral infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Miten Mistry & Dimitrios Letsios & Gerhard Krennrich & Robert M. Lee & Ruth Misener, 2021. "Mixed-Integer Convex Nonlinear Optimization with Gradient-Boosted Trees Embedded," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1103-1119, July.
    8. Mehmet Güney Celbiş, 2021. "A machine learning approach to rural entrepreneurship," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(4), pages 1079-1104, August.
    9. Sharan Srinivas, 2020. "A Machine Learning-Based Approach for Predicting Patient Punctuality in Ambulatory Care Centers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Federico Divina & Miguel García Torres & Francisco A. Goméz Vela & José Luis Vázquez Noguera, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Time Series Forecasting Methods for Short Term Electric Energy Consumption Prediction in Smart Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Mansoor, Umer & Jamal, Arshad & Su, Junbiao & Sze, N.N. & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Investigating the risk factors of motorcycle crash injury severity in Pakistan: Insights and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 21-38.
    12. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    13. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Piaopiao Chen & Agnès H. Michel & Jianzhi Zhang, 2022. "Transposon insertional mutagenesis of diverse yeast strains suggests coordinated gene essentiality polymorphisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Paulo Infante & Gonçalo Jacinto & Anabela Afonso & Leonor Rego & Pedro Nogueira & Marcelo Silva & Vitor Nogueira & José Saias & Paulo Quaresma & Daniel Santos & Patrícia Góis & Paulo Rebelo Manuel, 2023. "Factors That Influence the Type of Road Traffic Accidents: A Case Study in a District of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Ephrem Habyarimana & Faheem S Baloch, 2021. "Machine learning models based on remote and proximal sensing as potential methods for in-season biomass yields prediction in commercial sorghum fields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    18. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    19. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    20. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1680-:d:1227060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.