IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1612-d1217917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Security Assessment and Territory Spatial Restoration and Management of Inland River Basin—Based on the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Space

Author

Listed:
  • Xuebin Zhang

    (College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Ziyang Wang

    (College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yue Liu

    (College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jing Shi

    (College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Hucheng Du

    (College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Gansu Engineering Research Center of Land Utilization and Comprehension Consolidation, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Ecological security evaluation and land space governance are effective ways to ensure regional ecological security and realize sustainable development. This study evaluated the ecological security status at the raster scale and conducted research on the restoration and governance of the national territory, with the aim of implementing accurate restoration, reducing ecological restoration costs, and increasing ecological restoration benefits. Taking the typical arid inland river Shule River Basin as an example, this study selected evaluation factors from production, living, and ecological perspectives, obtained the influencing factors of regional ecological security by spatial principal component analysis, and calculated the ecological security index on the grid scale of production, life and ecological space. The macro-scale national parks, ecological protection red line and other realistic constraints are combined with the grid-scale ecological security evaluation results to achieve accurate land space restoration and governance. The results show that the ecological space accounts for 79.23%, and the production space only accounts for 7.47%, which is similar to other inland river basins in arid areas. The study found that per capita GDP and distance to the road have a significant impact on the ecological security of the study area from the perspectives of production and life, while distance to the water, vegetation coverage, and land cover have a significant impact on ecological security from the ecological perspective. Moderate, moderate low and low ecological security zones account for 72.09% of the total area of the basin, indicating that the ecological security guarantee ability of the Shule River Basin is low. The ecological security level of the living space was the lowest, and the ecological security pattern of the basin area as a whole presented a “higher in the north and south and lower in the middle” characteristic. The land restoration and governance of the Shule River Basin area was divided into five types of ecological control, ecological conservation, ecological enhancement, ecological restoration and ecological management, of which the ecological control area accounted for as much as 35.86%, implying that ecological security in the Shule River Basin has attracted sufficient attention from the government. It is considered that the management of production and living space is more difficult, complex and important, and the proportion of space is relatively small, so it is necessary to focus on the comprehensive management project of ecological protection and restoration. However, the ecological endowment conditions of ecological space in the Shule River Basin are relatively poor, and the distribution area is vast, so natural restoration should be given priority, supplemented by artificial restoration. This study provides a reference for regional ecological security evaluation, ecological civilization construction, and national ecological security research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuebin Zhang & Ziyang Wang & Yue Liu & Jing Shi & Hucheng Du, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment and Territory Spatial Restoration and Management of Inland River Basin—Based on the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1612-:d:1217917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangjie Pan & Nannan Shu & Qing Wan & Qi Huang, 2023. "Land Use Function Transition and Associated Ecosystem Service Value Effects Based on Production–Living–Ecological Space: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu, 2022. "Response Characteristics of Soil Erosion to Spatial Conflict in the Production-Living-Ecological Space and Their DrivingMechanism: A Case Study of Dongting Lake Basin in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Mosaffaie, Jamal & Salehpour Jam, Amin & Tabatabaei, Mahmoud Reza & Kousari, Mahammad Reza, 2021. "Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Jinghu Pan & Yimin Wang & Zhao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Optimization of Ecological Network in Arid Inland River Basin Using MSPA and Spatial Syntax: A Case Study of Shule River Basin, NW China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xifeng Zhang & Xiaowei Cui & Shuiming Liang, 2024. "Evolution and Optimization of an Ecological Network in an Arid Region Based on MSPA-MCR: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zechen Wang & Zhenqin Shi & Jingeng Huo & Wenbo Zhu & Yanhui Yan & Na Ding, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Funiu Mountain Area Based on MSPA and MCR Models, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    3. Rong Wang & Jinlong Wang & Wenhao Chen, 2023. "The Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Farming Household Livelihood Security: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Rumeng Yin & Xin Li & Bin Fang, 2023. "The Relationship between the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Land Use Function and the Level of Economic and Social Development in the Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Jiaxi Li & Changyuan Li & Chenyang Liu & Hailong Ge & Zheneng Hu & Zhuoya Zhang & Xueqiong Tang, 2023. "Analysis of the Coupling Coordination and Obstacle Factors between Sustainable Development and Ecosystem Service Value in Yunnan Province, China: A Perspective Based on the Production-Living-Ecologica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Zhijun Li & Yigang Wei & Yan Li & Zhicheng Wang & Jinming Zhang, 2020. "China’s Provincial Eco-Efficiency and Its Driving Factors—Based on Network DEA and PLS-SEM Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-31, November.
    7. Ziyang Wang & Peiji Shi & Xuebin Zhang & Huali Tong & Weiping Zhang & Yue Liu, 2021. "Research on Landscape Pattern Construction and Ecological Restoration of Jiuquan City Based on Ecological Security Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Zahra Ebrahimi Gatgash & Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, 2023. "Prioritization-based management of the watershed using health assessment analysis at sub-watershed scale," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9673-9702, September.
    9. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Jie Chen & Hui Fu & Shengtian Chen, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value at the City Level from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecological” Spaces: A Case Study of Haikou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Yuncheng Jiang & Bin Ouyang & Zhigang Yan, 2024. "The Response of Carbon Storage to Multi-Objective Land Use/Cover Spatial Optimization and Vulnerability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Yingbin Feng & Jingjing Li & Dedong Feng, 2023. "Research on Spatial Restructuring of Farmers’ Homestead Based on the “Point-Line-Surface” Characteristics of Mountain Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Peng Tian & Luodan Cao & Jialin Li & Ruiliang Pu & Yongchao Liu & Haitao Zhang & Caiyi Wang, 2022. "Ecosystem Stability Assessment of Yancheng Coastal Wetlands, a World Natural Heritage Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Xiaochen Sun & Bingzi Zhang & Shuni Ye & Sara Grigoryan & Yazhuo Zhang & Yike Hu, 2024. "Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Haojun Xie & Quan Sun & Wei Song, 2024. "Exploring the Ecological Effects of Rural Land Use Changes: A Bibliometric Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Reza Chamani & Mehdi Vafakhah & Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi, 2023. "Changes in reliability–resilience–vulnerability-based watershed health under climate change scenarios in the Efin Watershed, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2457-2476, March.
    17. Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini & Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie, 2022. "Flood risk management in Khorramabad watershed using the DPSIR framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3101-3121, December.
    18. Jing Xie & Binggeng Xie & Kaichun Zhou & Junhan Li & Jianyong Xiao & Changchang Liu & Xuemao Zhang, 2023. "Multiple Probability Ecological Network and County-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Iván López & Rodrigo Suarez & Mercedes Pardo, 2022. "A System of Indicators for Socio-Economic Evaluation and Monitoring of Global Change: An Approach Based on the Picos de Europa National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Junwu Wang & Yipeng Liu & Mingyang Liu & Suikuan Wang & Jiaji Zhang & Han Wu, 2022. "Multi-Phase Environmental Impact Assessment of Marine Ecological Restoration Project Based on DPSIR-Cloud Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1612-:d:1217917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.