IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p446-d1368128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaochen Sun

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Bingzi Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Shuni Ye

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Sara Grigoryan

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yazhuo Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yike Hu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Territorial spatial planning requires thoughtful consideration of the scientific layout and synergistic control of production, living, and ecological spaces (PLESs). However, research in this field often neglects the human perspective and fails to account for people’s demands and behavioral characteristics. This study evaluates the level and spatial characteristics of residents’ production, living, and ecological behavioral (PLEB) flow, as well as the spatial pattern of the PLES functions, within the framework of the human–land coupling system. Therefore, to analyze the behavior–space coupling coordination relationship, the coupling coordination model is applied. The results indicate that the overall level of residents’ PLEB flow in rural–urban fringe areas is at a lower middle level and the functionality of the PLES is at a medium level, with a spatial distribution pattern of high in the northern and low in the southern areas. Most of the behavior–space matching types are in a state of mismatch between supply and demand. Meanwhile, the PLEB–PLES coupling coordination relationship is generally unbalanced, which is particularly noticeable in the production space. Regardless of whether the behavior–space matching type is a supply deficit or a supply surplus, the mismatch between supply and demand leads to uncoordinated and unreasonable spatial utilization. Overall, the findings of the study provide guidance for future research endeavors about PLESs and suggest embracing a human-centered scientific paradigm. Such a paradigm can promote high-quality, sustainable development of territorial spatial planning while strengthening the capacity and effectiveness of spatial governance and control.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaochen Sun & Bingzi Zhang & Shuni Ye & Sara Grigoryan & Yazhuo Zhang & Yike Hu, 2024. "Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:446-:d:1368128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangjie Pan & Nannan Shu & Qing Wan & Qi Huang, 2023. "Land Use Function Transition and Associated Ecosystem Service Value Effects Based on Production–Living–Ecological Space: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Lee, Jae Hyun & Davis, Adam W. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2017. "Triggers of behavioral change: Longitudinal analysis of travel behavior, household composition and spatial characteristics of the residence," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 4-21.
    3. Xinghua Cui & Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Guanzheng Wang & Jiale Liang & Sipei Pan & Binqiao Duan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Thomas Klinger & Martin Lanzendorf, 2016. "Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 243-271, March.
    5. Jonas De Vos & Long Cheng & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Do changes in the residential location lead to changes in travel attitudes? A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2011-2034, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanlan Xie & Xiaobo Liu & Xiaoshuang Zhuo & Shaoyao Zhang & Hao Zhang, 2025. "The Integration of Land Use Planning and the Varied Responses of Coupled Human–Natural Systems: A Case Study of Changning County in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klein, Marcus & Klinger, Thomas & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2024. "Residential self-selection and the relative importance of travel considerations in the residential choice of a car-reduced neighbourhood," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    3. Doddamani, Chetan & Manoj, M. & Maurya, Yashasvi, 2021. "Geographical scale of residential relocation and its impacts on vehicle ownership and travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Haseeb, Attiya & Mitra, Raktim, 2024. "Travel behaviour changes among young adults and associated implications for social sustainability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Mourtakos, Vasileios & Mantouka, Eleni G. & Fafoutellis, Panagiotis & Vlahogianni, Eleni I. & Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos, 2024. "Reconstructing mobility from smartphone data: Empirical evidence of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic crisis on working and leisure," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 241-254.
    6. Phani Kumar, P. & Ravi Sekhar, Ch. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2018. "Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 166-177.
    7. Rong Wang & Jinlong Wang & Wenhao Chen, 2023. "The Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Farming Household Livelihood Security: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolás, 2023. "Income inequality and rule-systems within public transport: A study of Medellín (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Sonja Haustein & Maarten Kroesen & Ismir Mulalic, 2020. "Cycling culture and socialisation: modelling the effect of immigrant origin on cycling in Denmark and the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1689-1709, August.
    10. Scheiner, Joachim, 2018. "Transport costs seen through the lens of residential self-selection and mobility biographies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-136.
    11. Große, Juliane & Olafsson, Anton Stahl & Carstensen, Trine Agervig & Fertner, Christian, 2018. "Exploring the role of daily “modality styles” and urban structure in holidays and longer weekend trips: Travel behaviour of urban and peri-urban residents in Greater Copenhagen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-149.
    12. Chen, Long & Huang, Jiahui & Jing, Peng & Wang, Bichen & Yu, Xiaozhou & Zha, Ye & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "Changing or unchanging Chinese attitudes toward ride-hailing? A social media analytics perspective from 2018 to 2021," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Jae-Hong Kwon & Gi-Hyoug Cho, 2023. "The Long-Lasting Impact of Past Mobility Dependence on Travel Mode Share in a New Neighborhood: The Case of the Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Sahu, Prasanta K. & Qureshi, Danish & Pani, Agnivesh, 2022. "Examining commercial vehicle fleet ownership decisions and the mediating role of freight generation: A structural equation modeling assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 26-33.
    15. De Vos, Jonas & Ettema, Dick & Witlox, Frank, 2018. "Changing travel behaviour and attitudes following a residential relocation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 131-147.
    16. Ko, Joonho & Lee, Sugie & Byun, Miree, 2019. "Exploring factors associated with commute mode choice: An application of city-level general social survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 36-46.
    17. Yu Fu & Qian Li & Julin Li & Kun Zeng & Liangsong Wang & Youhan Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Production-Living-Ecological Spaces in Sichuan Province Based on the PLUS Model and Assessment of Its Ecological and Environmental Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. De Vos, Jonas & Mouratidis, Kostas & Cheng, Long & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2021. "Does a residential relocation enable satisfying travel?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 188-201.
    19. Simona Mariana Popescu & Oana Mititelu-Ionuș & Dragoș Mihail Ștefănescu, 2024. "Linking Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Ecosystem Services’ Potential in Natura 2000 Site “Nordul Gorjului de Vest” (Southwest Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, May.
    20. Houshmand Masoumi & Atif Bilal Aslam & Irfan Ahmad Rana & Muhammad Ahmad & Nida Naeem, 2022. "Relationship of Residential Location Choice with Commute Travels and Socioeconomics in the Small Towns of South Asia: The Case of Hafizabad, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:446-:d:1368128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.