IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1052-d1654411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Integration of Land Use Planning and the Varied Responses of Coupled Human–Natural Systems: A Case Study of Changning County in Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlan Xie

    (College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Xiaobo Liu

    (College of Geography and Resources Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641100, China)

  • Xiaoshuang Zhuo

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Shaoyao Zhang

    (College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Hao Zhang

    (College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

Abstract

An urban–rural–natural imbalance is evident; investigating the spatiotemporal evolution of the transitional geo-space (TG) between them facilitates the integration of urban–rural land use planning. In this study, we proposed a complex system model to explore the interactive dynamics between the social–economic systems and natural ecosystems of Changning County, Southwest China, with the TG being identified and classified across the two systems. Based on a three-dimensional “direction–speed–pattern” framework, we further quantified production–living–ecological space (PLE) changes and examined the impacts of these changes on the TG from 2000 to 2022. The results are as follows: (1) The TG was classified into five categories that were stratified according to the coupling intensity and orientation of the socioeconomic system and natural ecosystems in Changning County. (2) The transition type with the most complex socio-ecological coupling was the type of semi-socioeconomic process–semi-natural ecological process, occupying 32.6% (309.4 km 2 ) of the county’s total area in 2000 and demonstrating the most pronounced spatial dynamics, exhibiting a reduction of 78.6 km 2 during the study period. (3) Negative impacts on TG dynamics were observed for the conversion of ecological space into agricultural production space ( p < 0.01; R 2 > 0.24) and the dynamic degree of PLE transformations ( p < 0.01; R 2 > 0.13). (4) The impacts of trends in PLE on the TG varied significantly across temporal phases, whereas the CONTAG index exhibited consistently non-significant effects throughout all study periods. This study provides a new insight into understanding the optimization of spatial development patterns in urban–rural–natural regions and offers theoretical support for the governance of national land space and high-quality economic and social development in mountainous areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlan Xie & Xiaobo Liu & Xiaoshuang Zhuo & Shaoyao Zhang & Hao Zhang, 2025. "The Integration of Land Use Planning and the Varied Responses of Coupled Human–Natural Systems: A Case Study of Changning County in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1052-:d:1654411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jingjing & Wang, Jing & Zhai, Tianlin & Li, Zehui & Huang, Longyang & Yuan, Shaohua, 2021. "Gradient characteristics of China's land use patterns and identification of the east-west natural-socio-economic transitional zone for national spatial planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Xiaochen Sun & Bingzi Zhang & Shuni Ye & Sara Grigoryan & Yazhuo Zhang & Yike Hu, 2024. "Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Xu, Ze & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Li, Chu, 2019. "Exploring urban green spaces in China: Spatial patterns, driving factors and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Fu, Jingying & Bu, Ziqiang & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Gang & Li, Xiang, 2022. "Sustainable land use diagnosis based on the perspective of production–living–ecological spaces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Duan, Yaming & Wang, Hui & Huang, An & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Longhui & Ji, Zhengxin, 2021. "Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Federico Amato & Biagio Antonio Maimone & Federico Martellozzo & Gabriele Nolè & Beniamino Murgante, 2016. "The Effects of Urban Policies on the Development of Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weisong Li & Yi Zeng & Yelin Peng & Wanxu Chen & Ying Dong & Ziyan Ye & Yan Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Mechanisms of the Global Production-Living-Ecological Space Coupling Coordination Degree," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Zhang, Yingjie & Zhang, Tianzheng & Zeng, Yingxiang & Cheng, Baodong & Li, Hongxun, 2021. "Designating National Forest Cities in China: Does the policy improve the urban living environment?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Xin Wu & Peng Cui, 2016. "A Study of the Time–Space Evolution Characteristics of Urban–Rural Integration Development in a Mountainous Area Based on ESDA-GIS: The Case of the Qinling-Daba Mountains in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Jingjing Liu & Jing Wang & Tianlin Zhai & Zehui Li, 2022. "The Response of Ecologically Functional Land to Changes in Urban Economic Growth and Transportation Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Ranka Gajić & Darinka Golubović-Matić & Biserka Mitrović & Svetlana Batarilo & Milena Kordić, 2021. "The Methodology for Supporting Land Use Management in Collective Housing towards Achieving Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of New Belgrade, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Rosa Rivieccio & Lorenzo Sallustio & Massimo Paolanti & Matteo Vizzarri & Marco Marchetti, 2017. "Where Land Use Changes Occur: Using Soil Features to Understand the Economic Trends in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Wang, Ruoyu & Cao, Mengqiu & Yao, Yao & Wu, Wenjie, 2022. "The inequalities of different dimensions of visible street urban green space provision: A machine learning approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Lin Zhang & Xingyue Ji & Yumeng Su & Zhaohua Lu, 2025. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Coupling and Coordination of “Production–Life–Ecological” in Energy-Rich Area: A Perspective on Structure and Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Edward Preweda & Elżbieta Jasińska, 2020. "Organization of the Building Space of Developments and Its Impact on Residential Housing Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Shen, Liyin & Cheng, Guangyu & Du, Xiaoyun & Meng, Conghui & Ren, Yitian & Wang, Jinhuan, 2022. "Can urban agglomeration bring “1 + 1 > 2Effect”? A perspective of land resource carrying capacity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Zhe Zhao & Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhihui Li & Wenjiao Shi & Zhigang Sun & Xuezhen Zhang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Ilaria Zambon & Pere Serra & Rosanna Salvia & Luca Salvati, 2018. "Fallow Land, Recession and Socio-Demographic Local Contexts: Recent Dynamics in a Mediterranean Urban Fringe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Ziqiang Bu & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang & Gang Lin, 2023. "Production–Living–Ecological Spatial Function Identification and Pattern Analysis Based on Multi-Source Geographic Data and Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Junzhe Zhang & Azhar Ali Laghari & Qingxia Guo & Jiyao Liang & Akash Kumar & Zhenghao Liu & Yongheng Shen & Yuehan Wei, 2024. "Evolution of Land Use and Its Hydrological Effects in the Fenhe River Basin Under the Production–Living–Ecological Space Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Yishao Shi & Jie Wu & Shouzheng Shi, 2017. "Study of the Simulated Expansion Boundary of Construction Land in Shanghai Based on a SLEUTH Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Randelli, Filippo & Martellozzo, Federico, 2019. "Is rural tourism-induced built-up growth a threat for the sustainability of rural areas? The case study of Tuscany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 387-398.
    18. Ziqi Yu & Xi Meng & Gongjue Yu, 2025. "Evolution of “Production–Living–Ecological” Spaces Conflicts and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in Inner Mongolia During Rapid Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Beniamino Murgante & Giuseppe Borruso & Ginevra Balletto & Paolo Castiglia & Marco Dettori, 2020. "Why Italy First? Health, Geographical and Planning Aspects of the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-44, June.
    20. Raquel Faria de Deus & José António Tenedório & Denise Pumain & Jorge Rocha & Margarida Pereira, 2023. "100 Years of Land-Use and Land-Cover Data: What Has Been the Effect of Spatial Planning in Coastal Land-Use and Land-Cover Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1052-:d:1654411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.