IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v122y2022ics0264837722004136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable land use diagnosis based on the perspective of production–living–ecological spaces in China

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Jingying
  • Bu, Ziqiang
  • Jiang, Dong
  • Lin, Gang
  • Li, Xiang

Abstract

Sustainable land use is an important part of sustainable development. China is the largest developing country and has made significant achievements in economic development. However, in the process of development, there are also problems such as tightening resource constraints and intensifying land use conflicts. With mainland China as the research area in this article, the perspective of “production–living–ecological spaces” (PLES) from the administrative unit scale and grid scale was used to build a land use evaluation index system. Through geographic information technology and mathematical models, we researched PLES spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of various Chinese cities, regions, and provinces, and analyzed the present situation of the coupling coordination and drew several conclusions. (1) From 2010–2019, the PLES function scores of cities in China increased to a certain extent, presenting a high spatial distribution pattern in the south and low in the north, and the spatial correlation analysis shows that there is a certain correlation between the land use function scores of each city. (2) From 2010–2019, the spatial suitability of PLES in China showed a downward trend, suggesting that human activities and different land use patterns may have a certain impact on land use suitability. In addition, ecological space suitability is negatively correlated with human production and living activities. (3) The coupling coordination degree of land use in China has been continuously reducing over the past 9 years, indicating that the coordination degree of different land use activities has been continuously deteriorated. There are also some cities with poor PLES coordination, caused by unreasonable production and living activities inflicting great damage upon the ecological space, or by low production efficiency with dense populations. Therefore, it is suggested to reasonably adjust the layout of land space, improve the efficiency of land resource utilization, and pay attention to the harmonious development between humans and nature, so as to achieve the sustainable development of land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Jingying & Bu, Ziqiang & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Gang & Li, Xiang, 2022. "Sustainable land use diagnosis based on the perspective of production–living–ecological spaces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722004136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722004136
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koroso, Nesru H. & Zevenbergen, Jaap A. & Lengoiboni, Monica, 2020. "Urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia: An assessment of urban land use sustainability in Addis Ababa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Zhan, Cun & Liang, Chuan & Zhao, Lu & Zhang, Yaling & Cheng, Long & Jiang, Shouzheng & Xing, Liwen, 2021. "Multifractal characteristics analysis of daily reference evapotranspiration in different climate zones of China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    3. Chao Wei & Qiaowen Lin & Li Yu & Hongwei Zhang & Sheng Ye & Di Zhang, 2021. "Research on Sustainable Land Use Based on Production–Living–Ecological Function: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Xuesong Zhang & Zijin Xu, 2021. "Functional Coupling Degree and Human Activity Intensity of Production–Living–Ecological Space in Underdeveloped Regions in China: Case Study of Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Li, Yi & Wu, Xiao-Peng & Li, Qiu-Sheng & Tee, Kong Fah, 2018. "Assessment of onshore wind energy potential under different geographical climate conditions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 498-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongji Chen & Qingyuan Yang & Kangchuan Su & Haozhe Zhang & Dan Lu & Hui Xiang & Lulu Zhou, 2021. "Identification and Optimization of Production-Living-Ecological Space in an Ecological Foundation Area in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Lanyi Wei & Yanjun Zhang & Lingzhi Wang & Zilang Cheng & Xuying Wu, 2022. "Obstacle Indicators Diagnosis and Advantage Functions Zoning Optimization Based on “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions of National Territory Space in Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Yuchun Wang & Xiaoyan Lu & Jie Zhang & Yunfeng Ruan & Bingyi Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distributions of Multiple Land Use Functions and Their Coupling Coordination Degree in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Gang Lin & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang, 2021. "Production–Living–Ecological Conflict Identification Using a Multiscale Integration Model Based on Spatial Suitability Analysis and Sustainable Development Evaluation: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Bu, Yan & Wang, Erda & Möst, Dominik & Lieberwirth, Martin, 2022. "How population migration affects carbon emissions in China: Factual and counterfactual scenario analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Wentao Niu & Jingyi Shi & Zhenzhen Xu & Tianxi Wang & Hexiong Zhang & Xiaoshan Su, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainable Land Use in Ecologically Fragile Regions: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    9. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Qu, Yanbo & Li, Yan & Zhao, Weiying & Zhan, Lingyun, 2023. "Does the rural housing land system reform model meeting the needs of farmers improve the welfare of farmers?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Yansong Zhang & Yujie Wei & Yu Mao, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment of Regional Water Resources in China Based on DPSIR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Li, Chong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Hui & Lu, Yuzheng & Li, Dongdong, 2020. "Techno-economic performance study of stand-alone wind/diesel/battery hybrid system with different battery technologies in the cold region of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Tasir Khan & Ishfaq Ahmad & Yejuan Wang & Muhammad Salam & Amina Shahzadi & Masooma Batool, 2024. "Comparison approach for wind resource assessment to determine the most precise approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1315-1338, May.
    17. Workineh, Nigatu Amsalu, 2021. "Rezoning prior urban planning period for urban space development in Injibara Town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Xin Chen & Can Li & Huixia Li & Jingfeng Ge & Wengang Wang & Pengfei An, 2023. "Evaluation of the operation status of the residential land market in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China and its spatiotemporal pattern characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722004136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.