IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p726-d1105018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation System to Optimize the Management of Interventions in the Historic Center of Florence World Heritage Site: From Building Preservation to Block Refurbishment

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Acampa

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna “Kore”, Piazza dell’Università, 94100 Enna, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Battisti

    (Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Via di San Niccolò, 93, 50125 Florence, Italy)

  • Mariolina Grasso

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna “Kore”, Piazza dell’Università, 94100 Enna, Italy)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present a methodology for setting priorities among interventions in the old city center of Florence, going from the conservation to the regeneration of its heritage. The proposed methodology is based on specific methods of analysis of degradation and parameters for the optimization of construction costs. The methodology can be considered an additional part of the Management Plan of the site of the Historic Center of Florence (adopted for the first time in 2016 and now updated with the inclusion of a buffer zone) that “represents an important tool for the conservation and enhancement of the Heritage and is also a source of address for the choices that the Administration is called to adopt regarding the use of the city and its spaces”. The application of the method, in addition to being in harmony with some of the action projects of the second macro-area of the new Management Plan, also has points of contact with the provisions of the Municipal Operational Plan that provides for a reinterpretation of the existing building heritage. From the monitoring of individual buildings, aimed at their preservation, we will move to study the relationships that promote the creation of joint construction sites, thus optimizing costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Mariolina Grasso, 2023. "An Evaluation System to Optimize the Management of Interventions in the Historic Center of Florence World Heritage Site: From Building Preservation to Block Refurbishment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:726-:d:1105018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baharak Ashrafi & Carola Neugebauer & Michael Kloos, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Heritage Impact Assessment: A Review and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    3. Janjira Sukwai & Nobuo Mishima & Nattasit Srinurak, 2022. "Balancing Cultural Heritage Conservation: Visual Integrity Assessment to Support Change Management in the Buffer Zone of Chiang Mai Historic City Using GIS and Computer-Generated 3D Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Fabiana Forte & Vincenzo Del Giudice & Pierfrancesco De Paola & Federica Troisi, 2020. "Erratum: Forte, F., et al. Valuation of the Vocationality of Cultural Heritage: The Vesuvian Villas. Sustainability 2020, 12 , 943," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-1, March.
    6. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Andrés José Prieto & Juan Manuel Macías-Bernal & Ana Silva & Pilar Ortiz, 2019. "Fuzzy Decision-Support System for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Eleonora Di Matteo & Paolo Roma & Santo Zafonte & Umberto Panniello & Lorenzo Abbate, 2021. "Development of a Decision Support System Framework for Cultural Heritage Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Giuseppe De Luca & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi & Carlo Francini & Giovanni Liberatore, 2020. "Sustainable Cultural Heritage Planning and Management of Overtourism in Art Cities: Lessons from Atlas World Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Reuse Projects: An Integrated Approach for the Historical Rural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdollahzadeh, Hadi & Atashgar, Karim & Abbasi, Morteza, 2016. "Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 247-261.
    2. Li, Meiyan & Wu, Bei, 2024. "Optimal condition-based opportunistic maintenance policy for two-component systems considering common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Ayse Sena Eruguz & Tarkan Tan & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Optimizing usage and maintenance decisions for k‐out‐of‐n systems of moving assets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 418-434, August.
    5. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    6. Liang, Zhenglin & Li, Yan-Fu, 2023. "Holistic Resilience and Reliability Measures for Cellular Telecommunication Networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    9. Thomas Bittar & Pierre Carpentier & Jean-Philippe Chancelier & Jérôme Lonchampt, 2022. "A decomposition method by interaction prediction for the optimization of maintenance scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 229-267, September.
    10. Richard Stoffle & Octavius Seowtewa & Cameron Kays & Kathleen Van Vlack, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-34, November.
    11. Nguyen, Ho Si Hung & Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai-Canh & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Dynamic maintenance grouping and routing for geographically dispersed production systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 392-404.
    12. Salari, Nooshin & Makis, Viliam, 2017. "Comparison of two maintenance policies for a multi-unit system considering production and demand rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 381-391.
    13. Zhicheng Zhu & Yisha Xiang & Bo Zeng, 2021. "Multicomponent Maintenance Optimization: A Stochastic Programming Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 898-914, July.
    14. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    15. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    16. Kivanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2024. "A scalable multi-objective maintenance optimization model for systems with multiple heterogeneous components and a finite lifespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 567-579.
    17. Gabriele Battista & Emanuele de Lieto Vollaro & Andrea Vallati & Roberto de Lieto Vollaro, 2023. "Technical–Financial Feasibility Study of a Micro-Cogeneration System in the Buildings in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Donnacha Bolger & Brett Houlding, 2016. "Reliability updating in linear opinion pooling for multiple decision makers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(3), pages 309-322, June.
    19. Marco Gola & Marta Dell’Ovo & Stefano Scalone & Stefano Capolongo, 2022. "Adaptive Reuse of Social and Healthcare Structures: The Case Study as a Research Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Zhou, Yifan & Lin, Tian Ran & Sun, Yong & Bian, Yangqing & Ma, Lin, 2015. "An effective approach to reducing strategy space for maintenance optimisation of multistate series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 40-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:726-:d:1105018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.