IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1904-d1257111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources at the County Scale: A Case Study of Guangxi, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhantu Chen

    (College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Li Ren

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Ling Xie

    (College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Qiong Xiao

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Revealing the multidimensional value of cultivated land resources, improving calculation methods, and exploring their spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors are crucial for the enhancement of natural resource accounting systems and the protection of cultivated land resources. This study takes Guangxi, China, as an example and constructs a comprehensive multidimensional value evaluation system for cultivated land resources at the county scale. The income capitalization method, substitution market method, and value equivalent correction method were applied to calculate the economic, social, and ecological values of cultivated land resources in 111 counties in 2020. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation analysis was employed to study their distribution characteristics and influencing factors. The results show that: (1) In 2020, the total value of cultivated land resources in Guangxi was USD 2859.3 billion, with the economic, social, and ecological values were USD 1674.2 billion, USD 417.7 billion and USD 767.3 billion USD, respectively. (2) The economic and social value of cultivated land per hectare at the county scale in Guangxi demonstrates similar spatial distribution patterns. High-value counties exhibit a strip-like distribution along the eastern edge, following a north–south orientation, while low-value counties form clusters in the central and western regions. (3) There is a significant spatial clustering effect of all values of cultivated land resources in local space, with “high-high” and “low-low” clustering. (4) The level of economic development in counties has a negative impact on the ecological value of cultivated land resources, while it has a positive impact on their social value. (5) Natural conditions, agricultural infrastructure conditions and agricultural development approaches are the key factors affecting the value of cultivated land resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhantu Chen & Li Ren & Ling Xie & Qiong Xiao, 2023. "Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources at the County Scale: A Case Study of Guangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1904-:d:1257111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patton, Myles & Kostov, Philip & McErlean, Seamus & Moss, Joan, 2008. "Assessing the influence of direct payments on the rental value of agricultural land," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 397-405, October.
    2. Bastian, Chris T. & McLeod, Donald M. & Germino, Matthew J. & Reiners, William A. & Blasko, Benedict J., 2002. "Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 337-349, March.
    3. Anthony Burns & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2012. "The Land Governance Assessment Framework : Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2376, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhantu Chen & Lulu Deng & Yiman Chen & Feili Wei, 2025. "Research on the Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources in the Pearl River–Xijiang Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    3. Steven Stillman, 2005. "Examining Changes in the Value of Rural Land in New Zealand between 1989 and 2003," Urban/Regional 0509015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Natalya Presman & Tanya Suhoy, 2024. "How have government housing programs affected developers' bids in Israel Land Authority land tenders?," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2024.08, Bank of Israel.
    5. Lupale Mubanga & Hampwaye Godfrey, 2019. "Inclusiveness of Urban Land Administration in the City of Lusaka, Zambia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 46(46), pages 53-70, December.
    6. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    7. Thierry Ngoga & Francois Ntaganda & Karim Tushabe & David Niyonsenga & Nadia Ingabire & Pothin Muvara, 2017. "Land Governance Assessment Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 28492, The World Bank Group.
    8. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    9. Björn Hoops & Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2019. "The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Feichtinger, Paul & Salhofer, Klaus, 2013. "A Spatial Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in Bavaria," Working papers 160741, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Tagliafierro, C. & Boeri, M. & Longo, A. & Hutchinson, W.G., 2016. "Stated preference methods and landscape ecology indicators: An example of transdisciplinarity in landscape economic valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 11-22.
    12. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2018. "Does the basic payment efficiently enhance farm incomes? Evidences from Italy," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271957, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    14. Ciaian, Pavel & Pokrivcak, Jan & Kancs, d'Artis, 2013. "Empirical Evidence of the Distributional Effects of the CAP in New EU Member States," Working papers 157117, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    15. Kostov, Philip & Davidova, Sophia & Gjokaj, Ekrem, 2021. "Does Policy Support Really Help Farmers’ Incomes: The Case of Kosovo," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315278, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Muhly, Tyler B. & Musiani, Marco, 2009. "Livestock depredation by wolves and the ranching economy in the Northwestern U.S," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2439-2450, June.
    17. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Latruffe , Laure & Piet, Laurent & Dupraz, Pierre & Le Mouël, Chantal, 2013. "Influence of Agricultural Support on Sale Prices of French Farmland: A comparison of different subsidies, accounting for the role of environmental and land regulations," Factor Markets Working Papers 163, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    19. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Maria Espinosa, 2018. "The Impact of the 2013 CAP Reform on the Decoupled Payments’ Capitalisation into Land Values," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 306-337, June.
    20. Lynch, Lori & Duke, Joshua M., 2007. "Economic Benefits of Farmland Preservation: Evidence from the United States," Working Papers 7342, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1904-:d:1257111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.