IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1395-d897338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External Benefits of Irrigation in Mountain Areas: Stakeholder Perceptions and Water Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Novelli

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DiSAFA), University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy)

  • Francesca Moino

    (CREA Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Patrizia Borsotto

    (CREA Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, 00198 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Irrigation contributes to land and ecosystem degradation, especially in intensive farming areas. However, in marginal areas, long-established irrigation systems also supply agroecosystem services. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the external benefits provided by irrigation in extensive grazing farms in an Italian alpine region (Aosta Valley, NW Italy). Three local stakeholder groups (land irrigation consortia members, non-farmer users of the irrigation water service, and non-user citizens) engaged in focus group discussions. The transcriptions were analyzed with an integrated subjective and computer-assisted approach. The main result of the study showed that a convergence of stakeholder opinions led to prioritization of the same four benefits, i.e., hydro-geological and land maintenance, traditional agricultural landscape conservation, biodiversity conservation, and leisure recreational activities provision. Incorporating this information into decision-making processes is relevant in marginal mountain areas, especially in light of the implementation of the water pricing policy laid down in the EU Water Framework Directive. To this end, the economic value of the external benefits should be considered along with the recovery costs for water services. Such information is essential to balance the environmental costs of irrigation and to compare the resource cost of alternative water uses.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Novelli & Francesca Moino & Patrizia Borsotto, 2022. "External Benefits of Irrigation in Mountain Areas: Stakeholder Perceptions and Water Policy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1395-:d:897338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borsotto, Patrizia & Moino, Francesca & Novelli , Silvia, 2021. "Modeling change in the ratio of water irrigation costs to farm incomes under various scenarios with integrated FADN and administrative data," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 23(3), December.
    2. Zoderer, Brenda Maria & Tasser, Erich & Carver, Steve & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2019. "Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Alcon, Francisco & Zabala, José A. & Martínez-García, Victor & Albaladejo, José A. & López-Becerra, Erasmo I. & de-Miguel, María D. & Martínez-Paz, José M., 2022. "The social wellbeing of irrigation water. A demand-side integrated valuation in a Mediterranean agroecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Boelee, Eline, 2013. "Managing water and agroecosystems for food security," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 209484.
    5. Cristina Keiko Yamaguchi & Stéfano Frizzo Stefenon & Ney Kassiano Ramos & Vanessa Silva dos Santos & Fernanda Forbici & Anne Carolina Rodrigues Klaar & Fernanda Cristina Silva Ferreira & Alessandra Ca, 2020. "Young People’s Perceptions about the Difficulties of Entrepreneurship and Developing Rural Properties in Family Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Patrizia Borsotto & Francesca Moino & Silvia Novelli, 2021. "Modeling change in the ratio of water irrigation costs to farm incomes under various scenarios with integrated FADN and administrative data," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-19.
    7. Gordon, Line J. & Finlayson, C. Max & Falkenmark, Malin, 2010. "Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 512-519, April.
    8. Seyed Reza Es’haghi & Hamid Karimi & Amirreza Rezaei & Pouria Ataei, 2022. "Content Analysis of the Problems and Challenges of Agricultural Water Use: A Case Study of Lake Urmia Basin at Miandoab, Iran," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    9. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Mishan, E J, 1971. "The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Boelee, Eline, 2013. "Managing water and agroecosystems for food security," IWMI Books, Reports H046118, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Klauer, Bernd & Sigel, Katja & Schiller, Johannes, 2016. "Disproportionate costs in the EU Water Framework Directive—How to justify less stringent environmental objectives," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-17.
    13. Mara Thiene & Yacov Tsur, 2013. "Agricultural Landscape Value and Irrigation Water Policy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 641-653, September.
    14. Berthet, Elsa T. & Bretagnolle, Vincent & Gaba, Sabrina, 2022. "Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    15. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249, September.
    16. Grimble, Robin & Wellard, Kate, 1997. "Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 173-193, October.
    17. Boelee, Eline, 2013. "Managing water and agroecosystems for food security," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Boelee, Eline, 2013. "Managing water and agroecosystems for food security," IWMI Books, Reports H046175, International Water Management Institute.
    19. Sara Palomo-Campesino & José A. González & Marina García-Llorente, 2018. "Exploring the Connections between Agroecological Practices and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Fabiana Natali & Giacomo Branca, 2020. "On positive externalities from irrigated agriculture and their policy implications: An overview," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(2), pages 1-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alcon, Francisco & Zabala, José A. & Martínez-García, Victor & Albaladejo, José A. & López-Becerra, Erasmo I. & de-Miguel, María D. & Martínez-Paz, José M., 2022. "The social wellbeing of irrigation water. A demand-side integrated valuation in a Mediterranean agroecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Hrabrin Bachev, 2021. "Modes of Governance for Ecosystem Services in Bulgarian Farms," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 145-174.
    3. Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon & Wegerich, Kai, 2017. "The rising challenge of multiple water resource use at the urban fringes - evidence from Ferghana District of Uzbekistan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 41-53.
    4. Alejandro Cleves & Eva Youkhana & Javier Toro, 2022. "A Method to Assess Agroecosystem Resilience to Climate Variability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2020. "On how to define, assess and improve the governance of agro-ecosystem services," MPRA Paper 100117, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "Unpacking the governance of agro-ecosystem services – the case of Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 111693, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "Управленчески Форми За Снабдяване На Агро-Екосистемни Услуги От Земеделските Стопанства В България [Governance modes for the supply of agro-ecosystem services by agricultural farms in Bulgaria]," MPRA Paper 112847, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hrabrin Bachev, 2020. "Defining, analyzing and improving the governance of agroecosystem services," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-30,31-55.
    9. Lakhan Lal Mahato & Mukesh Kumar & Shakti Suryavanshi & Sudhir Kumar Singh & Deepak Lal, 2021. "Statistical investigation of long-term meteorological data to understand the variability in climate: a case study of Jharkhand, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16981-17002, November.
    10. Stanisław Rolbiecki & Roman Rolbiecki & Hicran A. Sadan & Barbara Jagosz & Wiesława Kasperska-Wołowicz & Ewa Kanecka-Geszke & Ferenc Pal-Fam & Atilgan Atilgan & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Renata Kuśmierek-T, 2024. "Sustainable Water Management of Drip-Irrigated Asparagus under Conditions of Central Poland: Evapotranspiration, Water Needs and Rainfall Deficits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2021. "A study on type, volume and governance of ecosystem services in Bulgarian farms," MPRA Paper 110966, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2021. "Ecosystem services of Bulgarian agriculture," MPRA Paper 105437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Nathalie Berta, 2016. "On the definition of externality as a missing market," Post-Print halshs-01277990, HAL.
    14. Nathalie Berta, 2017. "On the definition of externality as a missing market," Post-Print hal-02095696, HAL.
    15. Fabiana Natali & Giacomo Branca, 2020. "On positive externalities from irrigated agriculture and their policy implications: An overview," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(2), pages 1-25.
    16. Nathalie Berta, 2016. "On the definition of externality as a missing market," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01277990, HAL.
    17. Ko, Il-Dong, 1988. "Issues in the control of stock externality problems with inflexible policy measures," ISU General Staff Papers 198801010800009859, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Erik T. Verhoef, 1998. "The Implementation of Marginal External Cost Pricing in Road Transport," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-091/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Sagie, Hila & Orenstein, Daniel E., 2022. "Benefits of Stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Finn R. Førsund, 2018. "Multi-equation modelling of desirable and undesirable outputs satisfying the materials balance," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 67-99, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1395-:d:897338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.