IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p365-d1692241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inflation Forecasting: LSTM Networks vs. Traditional Models for Accurate Predictions

Author

Listed:
  • Tormod Rygh

    (Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Klæbuveien 72, 7030 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Camilla Vaage

    (Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Klæbuveien 72, 7030 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Sjur Westgaard

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alfred Getz vei 3, 7041 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Petter Eilif de Lange

    (Department of International Business, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Larsgårdsvegen 2, 6065 Ålesund, Norway)

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of neural network models, particularly LSTM networks, in enhancing the accuracy of inflation forecasting. We compare LSTM models with traditional univariate time series models such as SARIMA and AR(p) models, as well as machine learning approaches like LASSO regression. To improve the standard LSTM model, we apply advanced feature selection techniques and introduce data augmentation using the MBB method. Our analysis reveals that LASSO-LSTM hybrid models generally outperform LSTM models utilizing PCA for feature selection, particularly in datasets with multiple features, as measured by RMSE. However, despite these enhancements, LSTM models tend to underperform compared to simpler models like LASSO regression, AR(p), and SARIMA in the context of inflation forecasting. These findings suggest that, for policymakers and central bankers seeking reliable inflation forecasts, traditional models such as LASSO regression, AR(p), and SARIMA may offer more practical and accurate solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tormod Rygh & Camilla Vaage & Sjur Westgaard & Petter Eilif de Lange, 2025. "Inflation Forecasting: LSTM Networks vs. Traditional Models for Accurate Predictions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:365-:d:1692241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:365-:d:1692241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.